The UN World Summit on the Information Society is currently underway in
Geneva.
This report on WSIS is now available at the IP3 website:
"Understanding WSIS: An Institutional Perspective on the
UN World Summit on the Information Society"
http://www.ip3.gatech.edu
WSIS is hard to understand. The 2003 Geneva meeting of the UN World
Summit on the Information Society has brought thousands of people to
Geneva
to articulate a collective vision about the benefits and potentials of
information
in society and the policies needed to realize them.
Even immediate participants have difficulty
understanding what has been achieved.
With so many recommendations, which ones will lead to concrete political
action
and social change? What is important and why?
To help answer such questions, this report
provides an institutional analysis of WSIS.
It focuses on two main features: its characteristics as a policy forum
and the mechanisms
available to it for policy implementation.
This institutional analysis is then applied to a
set of WSIS policies to identify those with the
greatest potential to lead to social change. Two policies stand out:
Internet governance and
security. The WSIS forum is well suited to bestow legitimacy on a
proposal to alter
the existing Internet governance regime, and the available implementation
mechanisms
are well suited to put such a proposal into practice. Likewise,
WSIS is an
appropriate forum for promulgating a global agreement on security, and
the available
implementation mechanisms are also suitable. Other policy
topics considered are:
free and open software, communication rights, intellectual
property, human rights,
and funding.
To say these policies are good candidates for
action is not to say that they necessarily
will be endorsed and implemented. Nonetheless, by identifying
issues that "fit" the
world summit institution, this analysis can help set priorities for
action and to gain
understanding of outcomes.
Report available at:
http://www.ip3.gatech.edu
WSIS web site:
http://www.itu.int/wsis/
The Internet and Public Policy Project (IP3) promotes Internet
policy-related research in the
School of Public Policy at Georgia Tech. It promotes dialogue between
researchers within
and outside the Institute, offering forums for debate and
discussion.
This report is a joint project between IP3 and Computer Professionals for
Social Responsibility
(www.CPSR.org) with
funding from the Open Society Institute distributed through the Internet
Democracy Project.
Additional funding came from the Georgia Tech President Undergraduate
Research Award Program.
###