Dear listmembers
ESRC have asked me to do a scoping report to identify issues and problems
they should be funding around "the social shaping of eScience and
eSocial Science".
The basic idea is that despite enormous unfolding investment in eg grid
technologies, it seems we know almost nothing about how and why (and by
whom) these new technologies will be taken up, nor what will be the
likely effects on the nature and conduct of e(Social)Science research.
“Social shaping” is defined very broadly to include all social scientific
aspects of the genesis, use, implementation and effects of the new e
technologies.
Given the recent postings on this topic by Jeremy Hunsinger, Franz
Barjak, Denise Rall and Caroline Haythornthwaite; and given the
international nature of this list I’m keen to get your perspectives. We’d
like to know where and how you see your work fit in (if at all), and what
are your views on the issues and questions which should be funded. Would
you be so kind as to help us please by taking a few moments to respond to
the brief questions below?
Many thanks for your help (and apologies if you have already received
this request separately.)
Steve
1. We have thus far identified a number of questions and issues
that fall within the remit of social shaping of eScience and eSocial
Science. Examples are:
What social circumstances encourage or inhibit data sharing and
collaborative working? - How will the implementation of new grid
technologies affect this situation? - How will the new grid technologies
affect the methodologies employed by scientists and social scientists? -
How will patterns of communication between scientists be affected? - To
what extent will IPR be an issue? - Can we anticipate different attitudes
to risk, liability and responsibility? - Are changing structures of
accountability concomitant with changing communication practices? - What
are the issues around ethics, privacy and trust? - What different social
and economic factors affect the uptake and use of grid technologies in
different organisational settings? - How can scientists and social
scientists be persuaded to make use of the new technologies?
Which of these questions best describe your own work? Which others should
we add?
2. We have also identified a number of disciplinary perspectives
that come under the very broad rubric of “social shaping of eScience and
eSocial Science”. Examples are:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Which of these disciplinary perspectives best fits with your own work?
Or, if none of these apply, how would you characterise your work?
3. Could your work be reasonably described as:
a)
b)
c)
4.
a)
b)
c)
5. Please nominate 3 (or more) people who you regard
as the key players in this area:
6.
Thanks again!
Saïd Business School
University of Oxford
Park End Street
Oxford OX1 1HP
+44 (0)1865 288902
****************************
S Woolgar (ed) Virtual Society? - technology, cyberbole, reality
(Oxford University Press, 2002)
20% discount for orders through the website:
www.virtualsociety.org.uk