Fwd: 'Publish or perish' factor in spiralling retractions - Thomson Reuters analysis
Begin forwarded message:
From: Karen Weaver <melvil4u@GMAIL.COM> Date: August 21, 2009 7:23:28 PM EDT To: JESSE@LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: 'Publish or perish' factor in spiralling retractions - Thomson Reuters analysis Reply-To: Open Lib/Info Sci Education Forum <JESSE@LISTSERV.UTK.EDU>
'Publish or perish' factor in spiralling retractions Retractions up tenfold
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=407...
20 August 2009
By Zoë Corbyn
Excerpts from the full article linked above / best, kw
..."The rate at which scientific journal articles are being retracted has increased roughly tenfold over the past two decades, an exclusive analysis for Times Higher Education reveals." ... ..."Growth in research fraud as a result of greater pressure on researchers to publish, improved detection and demands on editors to take action have been raised as possible factors in the change." ... ..."The study, by the academic-data provider Thomson Reuters, follows the retraction last month of a paper on the creation of sperm from human embryonic stem cells." ...
..."The Thomson Reuters analysis charts the number of peer-reviewed scientific-journal articles produced each year from 1990 and the number of retractions."... "It shows that over nearly 20 years the number of articles produced has doubled, but the number of retractions - still a small fraction of the literature - has increased 20 times. This is equal to a tenfold increase, factoring in the growth of articles."...
..."The data are extracted from the Thomson Reuters Web of Science citation database, and apply to the journals covered by its Science Citation Index Expanded." ..."Whereas in 1990, just five of the nearly 690,000 journal articles that were produced worldwide were retracted, last year the figure was 95 of the 1.4 million papers published." ... Please see COMPLETE article linked above / kw
------------------------------ Karen Weaver, MLS, Adjunct Faculty, Cataloging & Classification, The iSchool at Drexel University, College of Information Science & Technology, Philadelphia PA email: karen.weaver@ischool.drexel.edu / Electronic Resources Statistician, Duquesne University, Gumberg Library, Pittsburgh PA email: weaverk@duq.edu
This is so true! I have been looking at some of the lecturing jobs advertised in Australia and for senior lecturer positions a requirement of 20 double-refereed publications is normal. I am curious if some great economist or philosopher (e.g. Nietzche, Sokrates etc.) would be able to get a university lecturing job not to mention becoming a professor :). If someone does not have a ph.d - chances of getting any kind of permanent academic appointment are minimal. With a ph.d but without an ''expected'' number of publications - one can never progress beyond a certain level. Research output is being measured on the basis of quantity of the publications/conference presentations rather than quality (asl long as publications/conference papers are double refereed). It took Albert Einstein 1 paper to to explain his theory of relativity. Now lets imagine Albert working in a contemporary university environment. Rather than publish this one paper he would instead have to produce 5 papers titled: 1) Relativity Case studies: the German Experience 2) 3-Country relativity comparison 3) Relativity in Papua New Gunea (probably woud be a joint publication with a Gunean Ph.D student of his) 4) Quantitative relativity assessment methods in Portugal (joint publication with a Portugese colleague) 5) Impact of relativity laws on women from non-English speaking background (Joint paper with someone from a center of Women Studies) This would give Albert a far greater research output and therefore better career opportunities. I keep asking myself ''Who reads all the research papers'....other than other researchers and students who need to use them for assignments/their own research"? As well as uni teaching, I have been involved in several Business Analysis/IT projects (as a consultant/Project Manager). My ongoing interaction with industry professionals has taught me that: Industry professional read white papers, manuals etc. but NEVER the academic papers. Another question is...can someone seriously imagine an academic producing 20 original publications a year? Yet, some people publish more than that! The pressure to produce more papers results in completely idiotic publications such as for example (this is not a real paper just an example :)) ''Longtitudonal studies of C++ Programming Techniques in France in 1997-2002'' why in France? because it makes is possible to publish another paper of similar nature 2 months later titled "C++ programming techniques in Spain" and 1 month later ''Comparing C++ programming Techniques in France and Spain" By the way, C++ is just a programming language :) so programming techniques are very much the same worldwide...and it is already common knowledge :). Am i exaggirating the problem? May be I am, but just a little bit! 60 years ago, when my grandfather was a university student - every single professor that he was having in his university was known for some kind of research-related achievements. Today, If you ask coursework university students what their lecturers are famous for...few will be able to answer. To be very honest, when writing about uselessness of majority of the academic publications..i am writing (among other things) about my own experiences. I have found reading some academic papers very useful for my ph.d, masters and other academic studies. But as someone who had to read a lot of academic papers recently - I had a chance to discover for myself - less than 10% of the papers published in my research area are actually original/groundbreaking in any way at all. However, if research performance of academics will continue to be assessed on the basis of the quantity of the papers published. I am sure some people will soon be producing more 100 papers a year :). Hey, its possible to write a new newspaper article a day (thats what many journalists are required to do as part of their jobs). So why not a research paper a day? On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:13 PM, jeremy hunsinger <jhuns@vt.edu> wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Karen Weaver <melvil4u@GMAIL.COM>
Date: August 21, 2009 7:23:28 PM EDT To: JESSE@LISTSERV.UTK.EDU Subject: 'Publish or perish' factor in spiralling retractions - Thomson Reuters analysis Reply-To: Open Lib/Info Sci Education Forum <JESSE@LISTSERV.UTK.EDU>
'Publish or perish' factor in spiralling retractions Retractions up tenfold
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&storycode=407...
20 August 2009
By Zoë Corbyn
Excerpts from the full article linked above / best, kw
..."The rate at which scientific journal articles are being retracted has increased roughly tenfold over the past two decades, an exclusive analysis for Times Higher Education reveals." ... ..."Growth in research fraud as a result of greater pressure on researchers to publish, improved detection and demands on editors to take action have been raised as possible factors in the change." ... ..."The study, by the academic-data provider Thomson Reuters, follows the retraction last month of a paper on the creation of sperm from human embryonic stem cells." ...
..."The Thomson Reuters analysis charts the number of peer-reviewed scientific-journal articles produced each year from 1990 and the number of retractions."... "It shows that over nearly 20 years the number of articles produced has doubled, but the number of retractions - still a small fraction of the literature - has increased 20 times. This is equal to a tenfold increase, factoring in the growth of articles."...
..."The data are extracted from the Thomson Reuters Web of Science citation database, and apply to the journals covered by its Science Citation Index Expanded." ..."Whereas in 1990, just five of the nearly 690,000 journal articles that were produced worldwide were retracted, last year the figure was 95 of the 1.4 million papers published." ... Please see COMPLETE article linked above / kw
------------------------------ Karen Weaver, MLS, Adjunct Faculty, Cataloging & Classification, The iSchool at Drexel University, College of Information Science & Technology, Philadelphia PA email: karen.weaver@ischool.drexel.edu / Electronic Resources Statistician, Duquesne University, Gumberg Library, Pittsburgh PA email: weaverk@duq.edu
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- "My Body is my Temple" "Be The Change You Want to See In The World." Gandhi
participants (2)
-
jeremy hunsinger -
Michael Baron