How are IRBs responding to research proposals involving Tweets? Would redaction of all user_names from metadata and @<username> from the tweets make it easier to get research approved? If so: Redact email and tweet IDs and other PII from large electronic datasets - Free Webinar 2 pm today http://bit.ly/ep9qfY ~Stu -- Stuart Shulman President & CEO Texifter, LLC <http://www.texifter.com/> Have you tried DiscoverText? http://discovertext.com *Featuring the Facebook Graph & Twitter APIs*
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Stuart Shulman <stuart.shulman@gmail.com> wrote:
How are IRBs responding to research proposals involving Tweets?
My IRB seemed happy to make my most recent study exempt with the rationale that all of the material I was studying was publicly-accessible. Kevin
Ditto + my IRB required that identifying info be removed and separated from the actual tweet + no identities would be used in the write up. Had to explain and emphasize "public" as initially it was not accepted. On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Kevin Guidry <krguidry@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Stuart Shulman <stuart.shulman@gmail.com> wrote:
How are IRBs responding to research proposals involving Tweets?
My IRB seemed happy to make my most recent study exempt with the rationale that all of the material I was studying was publicly-accessible.
Kevin _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- Best Regards, S. Courtney Walton scw@umail.ucsb.edu MA/PhD Student Department of Communication 4309 Social Sciences & Media Studies Bldg University of California, Santa Barbara 93106
participants (3)
-
Kevin Guidry -
S. Courtney Walton -
Stuart Shulman