NIST RFC: Cybersecurity, Innovation and the Internet Economy
Of possible interest to AIR'ers. -rick Source: http://cryptome.org/0002/nist072810.htm 28 July 2010 [Federal Register: July 28, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 144)] [Notices] [Page 44216-44223] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr28jy10-39] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Office of the Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology International Trade Administration National Telecommunications and Information Administration [Docket No.: 100721305-0305-01] Cybersecurity, Innovation and the Internet Economy AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce; National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce; International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce; and National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of inquiry. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce's Internet Policy Task Force is conducting a comprehensive review of the nexus between cybersecurity challenges in the commercial sector and innovation in the Internet economy. The Department seeks comments from all stakeholders, including the commercial, academic and civil society sectors, on measures to improve cybersecurity while sustaining innovation. Preserving innovation, as well as private sector and consumer confidence in the security of the Internet economy, are important for promoting economic prosperity and social well-being overall. In particular, the Department seeks to develop an up-to-date understanding of the current public policy and operational challenges affecting cybersecurity, as those challenges may shape the future direction of the Internet and its commercial use, both domestically and globally. After analyzing comments on this Notice, the Department intends to issue a report that will contribute to the Administration's domestic and international policies and activities in advancing both cybersecurity and the Internet economy. DATES: Comments are due on or before September 13, 2010. ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted by mail to Diane Honeycutt, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8930, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Submissions may be in any of the following formats: HTML, ASCII, Word, rtf, or pdf. Online submissions in electronic form may be sent to cybertaskforce@doc.gov . Paper submissions should include a three and one-half inch computer diskette or compact disc (CD). Diskettes or CDs should be labeled with the name and organizational affiliation of the filer and the name of the word processing program used to create the document. Comments will be posted at http://www.ntia.doc.gov/internetpolicytaskforce and http:/ /csrc.nist.gov . FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about this Notice contact: Jon Boyens, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 2806, Washington, DC 20230, telephone (202) 482-0573, e-mail Jon.Boyens@trade.gov ; or Alfred Lee, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 4725, Washington, DC 20230, telephone (202) 482-1880, e-mail Alee@ntia.doc.gov . Please direct media inquires to the National Institute of Standards and Technology's Office of Public and Business Affairs at (301) 975-6478.
I will be speaking at a teaching and learning conference later in the month, and I would like to hear your take on teaching effectively in the near future when university students will be even more hyperconnected than they are today. The lack of long-lasting battery power in laptops has been stopping many from being online all the time in most classes, but that's changing with the new wave of Internet appliances like iPad, netbooks, etc. Our students will enter classrooms armed with their complete gaming systems, collections of graphic novels and music, television and film entertainment, social networks...and - oh, yeah - also access to most of the cumulative knowledge of humankind at their fingertips. They'll be multitasking - working on this stuff or on assignments due for other courses the same day - while we're trying to command attention for the ideas we're trying to get across. People say you get their attention by having them implement their devices for class, rather than their other tasks, but I have found that they prefer to continue to multitask during class and they even actually prefer that I lecture instead of making them actively involved because that way they CAN multitask instead of having to give their full attention to one thing. Some are even hypercritical on course evaluations because they lost out on multitasking time because I mostly implemented an "engaged learning" setting where they were required to be present in one plane instead of multiples. Are the approaches and goals of teaching that have been emphasized in higher education in the 20th century still relevant in the 21st? How do we optimize on the opportunities we are experiencing today? How do we address the challenges we will find in students in our near future? Thanks for any comments you would like to share. All will be credited during my talk at the Elon University Teaching and Learning Conference. Janna -- Janna Quitney Anderson Director of Imagining the Internet www.imaginingtheinternet.org Associate Professor School of Communications Elon University
Hi Janna I think you need to rise to the meta level before you can address these issues: Why are the students taking the class seems to be the first question. If the students' needs are mixed, how should these be addressed.For example, if this is a distribution class for some where it's cram/pass/forget then the students have an objective which may not be congruent with your beliefs and desires and you have choicesFor example, if the material requires mastery in order to get to the next level, then there are different routes for them to demonstrate mastery and your relationship is differentFor example... In other words, how do you meet student needs and how best to deliver to meet those needs. Many K-12 schools have/are addressing these issues and it is those students who move on who are the ones with which universities have to deal, regardless whether these students come with a pen and a notebook or a backpack full of ipads, mp3's, net books and brain implants. As the "for-profits" have found out, they are flexible because they don't own real estate and can open up in the building across the street or deliver virtually from a professor's kitchen table. Most faculty, because they are on a campus are tied to bricks and mortar and no amount of wiring of those bricks can deal with the changing needs of an education. the ontological underpinnings have changed and education is still using an old epistemology. Think process philosophy or for practice outside of the Ivory Tower- think Clayton Christensen, David Snowden, Max Boisot and others. Socrates preferred the Agora over time in the Acropolis. tom dr. tom p abeles, editorOn the Horizonhttp://www.emeraldinsight.com/oth.htmtabeles@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:19:08 -0400 From: andersj@elon.edu To: air-l@listserv.aoir.org Subject: Re: [Air-L] How best to teach hyperconnected students?
I will be speaking at a teaching and learning conference later in the month, and I would like to hear your take on teaching effectively in the near future when university students will be even more hyperconnected than they are today. The lack of long-lasting battery power in laptops has been stopping many from being online all the time in most classes, but that's changing with the new wave of Internet appliances like iPad, netbooks, etc.
Our students will enter classrooms armed with their complete gaming systems, collections of graphic novels and music, television and film entertainment, social networks...and - oh, yeah - also access to most of the cumulative knowledge of humankind at their fingertips. They'll be multitasking - working on this stuff or on assignments due for other courses the same day - while we're trying to command attention for the ideas we're trying to get across. People say you get their attention by having them implement their devices for class, rather than their other tasks, but I have found that they prefer to continue to multitask during class and they even actually prefer that I lecture instead of making them actively involved because that way they CAN multitask instead of having to give their full attention to one thing. Some are even hypercritical on course evaluations because they lost out on multitasking time because I mostly implemented an "engaged learning" setting where they were required to be present in one plane instead of multiples.
Are the approaches and goals of teaching that have been emphasized in higher education in the 20th century still relevant in the 21st? How do we optimize on the opportunities we are experiencing today? How do we address the challenges we will find in students in our near future?
Thanks for any comments you would like to share. All will be credited during my talk at the Elon University Teaching and Learning Conference.
Janna
-- Janna Quitney Anderson Director of Imagining the Internet www.imaginingtheinternet.org Associate Professor School of Communications Elon University
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
I taught a course in the J-school at UNC with no reading and no writing. Now that I have your attention, here's how: readings were replaced by viewings of talks by the same authors I would have assigned to read. the talks were from TED, Berkman or other public presentations. students responded the evening before class with 2 minute videos, animations or screen captures. in class, it was f2f based on the responses and the questions raised in the talks. visiting speakers to the class came to us via Skype. The course itself was about Vernacular Video and Virtual Communities and so was multi-disciplinary and broad in approach. syllabus (done in wordpress) http://ibiblio.org/pjones/jomc449/wordpress On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Janna Anderson <andersj@elon.edu> wrote:
I will be speaking at a teaching and learning conference later in the month, and I would like to hear your take on teaching effectively in the near future when university students will be even more hyperconnected than they are today. The lack of long-lasting battery power in laptops has been stopping many from being online all the time in most classes, but that's changing with the new wave of Internet appliances like iPad, netbooks, etc.
Our students will enter classrooms armed with their complete gaming systems, collections of graphic novels and music, television and film entertainment, social networks...and - oh, yeah - also access to most of the cumulative knowledge of humankind at their fingertips. They'll be multitasking - working on this stuff or on assignments due for other courses the same day - while we're trying to command attention for the ideas we're trying to get across. People say you get their attention by having them implement their devices for class, rather than their other tasks, but I have found that they prefer to continue to multitask during class and they even actually prefer that I lecture instead of making them actively involved because that way they CAN multitask instead of having to give their full attention to one thing. Some are even hypercritical on course evaluations because they lost out on multitasking time because I mostly implemented an "engaged learning" setting where they were required to be present in one plane instead of multiples.
Are the approaches and goals of teaching that have been emphasized in higher education in the 20th century still relevant in the 21st? How do we optimize on the opportunities we are experiencing today? How do we address the challenges we will find in students in our near future?
Thanks for any comments you would like to share. All will be credited during my talk at the Elon University Teaching and Learning Conference.
Janna
-- Janna Quitney Anderson Director of Imagining the Internet www.imaginingtheinternet.org Associate Professor School of Communications Elon University
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- "Work as if you live in the early days of a better nation." Alasdair Gray "And best of all is finding a place to be in the early days of a better civilization." Dennis Lee
participants (4)
-
Janna Anderson -
paul jones -
Richard Forno -
tom abeles