Re: [Air-l] Why not make Aoir 5.0 "Virtual conference"?
As we are all researchers on the "virtual world", why should we still keep to the old, pre-Internet tradition of holding an annual conference in a "real venue," but not in a "virtual venue"?
Please have a look at my paper presented IN SUSSEX (sic!) on exactly this topic. My conclusion was (and still is) that we will probably meet for ever in real space (for a variety of reasons): Nentwich, M., 2004, Ubiquitous cyberscience? On the limits to the virtualisation of research in the digital age, IR 5.0 "Ubiquity?" 19.-22.9., Brighton. (hopefully up for download in the members area of the aoir website soon)
What I suggest is that Aoir 5.0 could select one "real venue," and at the same time, set up a "virtual venue" for those who have registered, but for whatever reasons (be entry regulations, cost consideration, busy schedules, hurricanes, etc..) could not come to the "real venue" to participate, specially for panel discussions.
A combined venture would be an interesting experience, which needs however a lot of extra organisational effort. Just to do it for those few who have registred but didn't make would not be efficient. If we want to do it then it should be an event (or series of events) in its own right. Cheers, Michael ------------- M. Nentwich http://eiop.or.at/mn/ author of "Cyberscience" http://hw.oeaw.ac.at/3188-7
A combined venture would be an interesting experience, which needs however a lot of extra organisational effort. Just to do it for those few who have registred but didn't make would not be efficient. If we want to do it then it should be an event (or series of events) in its own right.
If any one is interested in first hand account of doing a virtual event coupled w/ F2F event, I was part of a team (out of http://www.bigmindmedia.com) who did this recently for the International Appreciative Inquiry Conference. We learned a *lot* of lessons. There is definitely possibility in this practice to link up those who would not otherwise be able to come F2F (cost, visas, etc.) The biggest questions I came out of it were: * We can design a pretty damn good experience capturing the F2F for the distributed participatns. Do we want to and if so how do we do the reverse for the F2F? (Goes to fraccination of the audience?) * What did we learn from both elements that would inform design of group events in general (online and offline) - in other words, what past assumptions can we see in a new light? (LOTS here) * What does it really cost (we are working on that number now.) If you want to know more, feel free to contact me offllist.
participants (2)
-
Nancy White -
Nentwich, Michael