At the risk of aligning myself too readily with the potential techno-utopianism of the $100 Laptop project, I'd just like to point to Sugata Mitra's "Hole-in-the-Wall" studies and the surprising success that project had, using "Minimally Invasive Education" (their trademarked term) in increasing (at least some forms of) computer literacy among children in a variety of technologically disadvantaged rural settings: Check it out: http://www.hole-in-the-wall.com/findings.html On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:38:17 -0400 air-l@listserv.aoir.org wrote:

Look, i've used pots and pans for shovels before to dig my way out of snow drifts before i could afford a shovel. I've also used my old computer as a stepping stool. if there is a practical use for something that goes above and beyond its immediate projected usefulness, you can believe that people will be smart enough to use it that way. It is pragmatics and common sense. If the use value of an object is higher in another mode of use for whatever reason in a particular situation, then it will likely be used that way. if the use value of information technology is less than that of using it for a another need, people will tend to use it for the other need. it is not 'racist' to admit that. I've lived in rural areas in the u.s. and urban areas and let me tell you, people do not always use things in ways that I would use them and I don't expect that of anyone else. Do you?

The laptop... has built into it a certain ideology and set of western norms. There is a huge mental and knowledge infrastructure that goes into giving laptops the 'aura' that they have in our everyday lives. there is a ton of evidence that has shown that just giving countries computing infrastructure is not enough to transform them into learning or knowledge societies, there has to be an education program to parallel that infrastructure and then there has to be a plan for sustainability of the infrastructure also. In short, we have to export the ideology, norms, and knowledges to make things work the way we think they should work. However, it should be granted that not everyone thinks that we should pursue the normalization in parallel to the distribution of technology... However, then why are we designing the infrastructure according to our norms.

my point is that this program has no educational or sustainability program iin place and thus what will happen to it? what would you do with the computer when the computer no longer works? or you can't figure out how to work it for some reason.

as far as i can tell this whole $100 laptop program is predicated on the idea that technology can solve problems. Technology is just a tool, humans solve problems. If you don't give the humans the knowledge they need to build and sustain their own technological infrastructure, then in my opinion, you are just creating a larger digital divide, you have created a divide based on dependency. That will tend to develop into class divides much as happened in colonialism, is this project different than a digital colonization? I'm not sure.

The project that I really liked in this field was the simputer, it had a plan for education and sustainability, but costs got out of hand, much like the costs of the $100 laptop have.

On Jun 7, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Andre Brock wrote:

...

This has been an incredibly frustrating conversation. conversations about inequality and stratification do little to address the fact that there are millions of Africans who already use ICTs and would welcome the chance to have their own laptop for themselves or for their children.

don't assume that because its Africa that the need or capacity to use ICTs is somehow diminished because their utilities lack the stability and reliability of Western networks. After all, the United States has some of the most reliable ICT infrastructure in the world and still has higher rates of illiteracy and ICT-non participation than many smaller, poorer countries. ICT adoption, in a world increasingly inundated with the awareness of information as a tool, rests not simply upon the possession of the material artifact but much more so on the possibility of using information to improve one's life chances.

The comment about using a laptop as a shovel? completely out of line and insulting. Would you have made that comment about rural Chinese or Appalachian hill people?

Andre

-- Andre Brock PhD Candidate - Library and Information Studies Project Athena Fellow POSSE Mentor - UIUC Posse 2 (217.333.4693) University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign _______________________________________________ The air-l@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http:// listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org

Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/

Jeremy Hunsinger Center for Digital Discourse and Culture () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail /\ - against microsoft attachments

http://www.aoir.org The Association of Internet Researchers http://www.stswiki.org/ stswiki http://cfp.learning-inquiry.info/ LI-the journal http://transdisciplinarystudies.tmttlt.com/ Transdisciplinary Studies:the book series

_______________________________________________ The air-l@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org

Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/

Sara M. Grimes PhD Candidate/School of Communication Research Assistant/Applied Communication + Technology (ACT) Lab Simon Fraser University