Re: [Air-L] Exercises for teaching digital ethnographic methods (remotely)
What about asking them to design an ethical research methodology for researching how people are using technology during the pandemic, or something like that? I think they're more likely to be able to focus on coursework if it's directly relevant to the worries and anxieties of their current digital life, and this might even help them feel slightly more in control of their situation. And maybe some of them will keep going and do really interesting research? Other resources: Deborah Lupton started a crowdsourced collection of resources for Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZ... The Selfie Research Network set up an online syllabus with lesson plans that would mostly work online from home. It was developed in 2014 but I think you could still use some of this. http://www.selfieresearchers.com/the-selfie-course/ Jill On 17/03/2020, 00:16, "Air-L on behalf of Morris,CJ (pgr)" <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk> wrote: Hi all, I'm now putting together lectures on digital qualitative/ethnographic/field methods for my departments undergraduate and postgraduate students. This seems like one of the few ways they will be able to safely do some of their assignments. I'll be giving this lecture via Zoom, a digital classroom. The current lecture design is: Intro -> My research background (digital ethnography of WeChat/Weibo activism) -> Understanding the digital field -> Ethics -> Q&A -> Doing ethnography in... (FB, WhatsApp, Weibo, Twitter, WeChat, Douyin/TikTok, Reddit, Insta, hashtags) -> being playful in the field -> exercise -> feedback -> final Q&A. I'm putting together a 30 minute exercise, but i was wondering if anyone had examples of successful digital, ethno/qualitative research methods exercises they've done. Particularly those that reflect on ethics, research design and methods. I'm currently planning on going basic, asking them putting together the research plan of a digitally centred study. This is open to change, but if I continue with this, does anyone have any recommendations for topics that they could do the plan for? I'd rather assign topics to the groups to help focus them in the short time period we have. Carwyn Morris PhD Candidate in Human Geography and Urban Studies Department of Geography and Environment London School of Economics Co-organiser LSE China Reading Group Tweeting @carwyn<https://twitter.com/carwyn> _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
I agree with Jill. This is a perfect subject matter. There are online communities popping up everywhere focusing on corona and life in quarantine, everything from how to help each other to sharing memes. So your students could design a project for researching one of these ad hoc communities. Best regards Kristian Sendt fra min Samsung Galaxy-smarttelefon. -------- Opprinnelig melding -------- Fra: Jill Walker Rettberg <Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no> Dato: 17.03.2020 08:23 (GMT+01:00) Til: "Morris,CJ (pgr)" <C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk>, air-l@aoir.org Emne: Re: [Air-L] Exercises for teaching digital ethnographic methods (remotely) What about asking them to design an ethical research methodology for researching how people are using technology during the pandemic, or something like that? I think they're more likely to be able to focus on coursework if it's directly relevant to the worries and anxieties of their current digital life, and this might even help them feel slightly more in control of their situation. And maybe some of them will keep going and do really interesting research? Other resources: Deborah Lupton started a crowdsourced collection of resources for Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZ... The Selfie Research Network set up an online syllabus with lesson plans that would mostly work online from home. It was developed in 2014 but I think you could still use some of this. http://www.selfieresearchers.com/the-selfie-course/ Jill On 17/03/2020, 00:16, "Air-L on behalf of Morris,CJ (pgr)" <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk> wrote: Hi all, I'm now putting together lectures on digital qualitative/ethnographic/field methods for my departments undergraduate and postgraduate students. This seems like one of the few ways they will be able to safely do some of their assignments. I'll be giving this lecture via Zoom, a digital classroom. The current lecture design is: Intro -> My research background (digital ethnography of WeChat/Weibo activism) -> Understanding the digital field -> Ethics -> Q&A -> Doing ethnography in... (FB, WhatsApp, Weibo, Twitter, WeChat, Douyin/TikTok, Reddit, Insta, hashtags) -> being playful in the field -> exercise -> feedback -> final Q&A. I'm putting together a 30 minute exercise, but i was wondering if anyone had examples of successful digital, ethno/qualitative research methods exercises they've done. Particularly those that reflect on ethics, research design and methods. I'm currently planning on going basic, asking them putting together the research plan of a digitally centred study. This is open to change, but if I continue with this, does anyone have any recommendations for topics that they could do the plan for? I'd rather assign topics to the groups to help focus them in the short time period we have. Carwyn Morris PhD Candidate in Human Geography and Urban Studies Department of Geography and Environment London School of Economics Co-organiser LSE China Reading Group Tweeting @carwyn<https://twitter.com/carwyn> _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/ _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
I like the idea of focusing on current issues as Jill mentions, but in general, I think this would be difficult in a 30 minute exercise. Maybe that could be built into the main lecture more than the exercise.... In any case, I think 30 minutes is too short for designing a study. And if I understand correctly, Carwyn, you're giving a single lecture on the topic, right? So how would they get feedback on their research design? Two key questions I would be asking if I were doing this: What is the desired learning outcome for this 30-minute exercise? And will it fit into their current skillset? Do you want them to understand the steps in designing a research project? (are they skilled at creating research design generally, so that they can translate this into whatever you're framing as 'digital?) Or do you want them to feel how tough it is to design a study in a short period of time? (cuz 30 minutes is super short). Or to review basic ethical principles? Do you want them to practice some techniques? Or consider the size and scope of a possible study? These different goals require different setup. In this situation, you might ask yourself a different question: What do you really want them to *feel or experience* during this 30 minutes? If you don't know your audience, maybe you could have them do something that makes them think about research design in a more creative and ethical way. The outcome might be 'to raise questions,' rather than to 'build skill' or 'apply'. This is what I would do, but then again, I like exercises that are more provocative than anything else. Anyway here are some exercises that take around 30 minutes that I do: To get people to consider how much their own perspective matters in what they will see as 'the field,' or what they will notice in whatever they see as the field, I use an exercise called "write the room." The goal is to do three timed writing exercises with the verbal prompt, "write the room" and no further instruction. I disrupt their viewpoint in the second and third iteration in different ways so that they might understand the challenges of trying to understand culture in the first place. Hopefully, the exercise helps them appreciate the sensibilities underpinning a qualitative perspective. And helps them consider the power of observing, and the ethical responsibilities that could go along with this power. [I've written this up and am happy to share if it's interesting to you] To get people to think about ethics, I show or discuss a specific case and have them write a reflection essay in response to it, choosing one of the ethical guidelines from a reading like the AoIR ethics guidelines or an ethics article by one of our many AoIR members who write about ethics To get people to think about emic versus etic perspectives, I show a clip from Nightmare Before Christmas, when Jack the Pumpkin King is trying to describe the concept and feeling of Christmas to Halloween Town. And then, when he fails, he goes to his lab to dissect stuffed bears, analyze the chemical makeup of a Christmas ornament, and reads a book called "scientific method" to try to understand what makes Christmas so special (this only works with certain audiences, and in regions where Christmas is the big celebration) To get people to translate traditional ethnographic techniques to digital environments, I have them choose a typical technique X (interview, observe, participate, examine artifacts) and list what is desired from each of these activities, asking the question "why do we X in the first place?" What does X yield?". Then, taking the case of a specific app/platform, reverse engineer the "what is desired" into a set of research actions/activities that would have a similar yield and would fit the actual context of study. E.g., we do interviews to elicit. One thing we desire from interviews to hear information from people directly. Interviews give us an individual's perceptions, more than information of their actual behaviors. So interviews are good for learning how people feel or what they perceive. How would we achieve these goals in wechat? Twitter? .... I'm happy to talk more about these, Annette On 3/17/20, 08:22, "Air-L on behalf of Jill Walker Rettberg" <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no> wrote: What about asking them to design an ethical research methodology for researching how people are using technology during the pandemic, or something like that? I think they're more likely to be able to focus on coursework if it's directly relevant to the worries and anxieties of their current digital life, and this might even help them feel slightly more in control of their situation. And maybe some of them will keep going and do really interesting research? Other resources: Deborah Lupton started a crowdsourced collection of resources for Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZ... The Selfie Research Network set up an online syllabus with lesson plans that would mostly work online from home. It was developed in 2014 but I think you could still use some of this. http://www.selfieresearchers.com/the-selfie-course/ Jill On 17/03/2020, 00:16, "Air-L on behalf of Morris,CJ (pgr)" <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk> wrote: Hi all, I'm now putting together lectures on digital qualitative/ethnographic/field methods for my departments undergraduate and postgraduate students. This seems like one of the few ways they will be able to safely do some of their assignments. I'll be giving this lecture via Zoom, a digital classroom. The current lecture design is: Intro -> My research background (digital ethnography of WeChat/Weibo activism) -> Understanding the digital field -> Ethics -> Q&A -> Doing ethnography in... (FB, WhatsApp, Weibo, Twitter, WeChat, Douyin/TikTok, Reddit, Insta, hashtags) -> being playful in the field -> exercise -> feedback -> final Q&A. I'm putting together a 30 minute exercise, but i was wondering if anyone had examples of successful digital, ethno/qualitative research methods exercises they've done. Particularly those that reflect on ethics, research design and methods. I'm currently planning on going basic, asking them putting together the research plan of a digitally centred study. This is open to change, but if I continue with this, does anyone have any recommendations for topics that they could do the plan for? I'd rather assign topics to the groups to help focus them in the short time period we have. Carwyn Morris PhD Candidate in Human Geography and Urban Studies Department of Geography and Environment London School of Economics Co-organiser LSE China Reading Group Tweeting @carwyn<https://twitter.com/carwyn> _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/ _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Dear all, First the ideas shared so far, and then a reply to Annette 😊 Recommendations have included: 1. Jodi: trace ethnography http://stuartgeiger.com/papers/trace-ethnography-hicss-geiger-ribes.pdf 2. From Crystal: * The exercises invite students to draw on their choice/knowledge of internet pop culture, which can be lighthearted and meta during this time. * On paralanguage short films: https://wishcrys.com/paralanguage-short-film/ * On internet paralanguages: https://wishcrys.com/internet-paralanguages/ * On internet celebrity: https://wishcrys.com/internet-celebrity/ * This old but gold selfie syllabus put together by several AoIR members in The Selfies Research Network is a great resource: http://www.selfieresearchers.com/the-selfie-course/selfie-syllabus/ 3. Evelina: presented fictive research cases for the students to discuss if the students taught the cases where ethical and how the students would go about to gather material in the most ethical way. Following the aoir research ethics guidelines. For reflection and not examination. 4. Jill: design an ethical research methodology for researching how people are using technology during the pandemic. Also, the Selfie Researchers and Deborah Lupton started a crowdsourced collection of resources for Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZ... 5. Kristian: building on Jill's comment, online communities popping up everywhere focusing on corona and life in quarantine, everything from how to help each other to sharing memes. So your students could design a project for researching one of these ad hoc communities. 6. Annette: * Two key questions I would be asking if I were doing this: What is the desired learning outcome for this 30-minute exercise? And will it fit into their current skillset? * Consider, what do you really want them to *feel or experience* during these sessions? What can you do in a short session? Could have them do something that makes them think about research design in a more creative and ethical way. The outcome might be 'to raise questions,' rather than to 'build skill' or 'apply'. Suggested exercises: * To get people to consider how much their own perspective matters in what they will see as 'the field,' or what they will notice in whatever they see as the field, I use an exercise called "write the room." The goal is to do three timed writing exercises with the verbal prompt, "write the room" and no further instruction. I disrupt their viewpoint in the second and third iteration in different ways so that they might understand the challenges of trying to understand culture in the first place. Hopefully, the exercise helps them appreciate the sensibilities underpinning a qualitative perspective. And helps them consider the power of observing, and the ethical responsibilities that could go along with this power. [I've written this up and am happy to share if it's interesting to you] * To get people to think about ethics, I show or discuss a specific case and have them write a reflection essay in response to it, choosing one of the ethical guidelines from a reading like the AoIR ethics guidelines or an ethics article by one of our many AoIR members who write about ethics * To get people to think about emic versus etic perspectives, I show a clip from Nightmare Before Christmas, when Jack the Pumpkin King is trying to describe the concept and feeling of Christmas to Halloween Town. And then, when he fails, he goes to his lab to dissect stuffed bears, analyze the chemical makeup of a Christmas ornament, and reads a book called "scientific method" to try to understand what makes Christmas so special (this only works with certain audiences, and in regions where Christmas is the big celebration) * To get people to translate traditional ethnographic techniques to digital environments, I have them choose a typical technique X (interview, observe, participate, examine artifacts) and list what is desired from each of these activities, asking the question "why do we X in the first place?" What does X yield?". Then, taking the case of a specific app/platform, reverse engineer the "what is desired" into a set of research actions/activities that would have a similar yield and would fit the actual context of study. E.g., we do interviews to elicit. One thing we desire from interviews to hear information from people directly. Interviews give us an individual's perceptions, more than information of their actual behaviors. So interviews are good for learning how people feel or what they perceive. How would we achieve these goals in wechat? Twitter? .... I can add other things to this last as they come. Thanks for your points, Annette. For context, this is an additional class in their methods course, and they have already done 18 lectures and seminars on methods. So I believe that they should already have a decent background in qualitative research methods. I know that ideally this topic would be an entire semester, this should not be a cut and paste job, but this is the only time the department can give me it seems (and I have to submit my thesis in 3 weeks time). As far as I can tell, if I don't do this session the students won't have a session, and time is short. During the session i aim to familiarise them with debates on digital ethics (your writing included), the importance of understanding the field (how censorship, mobility, surveillance, privacy and visibility work, boundedness and the territoriality of certain sites -> i'm a geographer), several principles to consider (based partly on Pink et al.), how the techniques they already have can be used in digitally centred research, introducing ideas of playfulness in the field (to understand the field) and then exploring several potential field sites (Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, Instagram, Weibo, WeChat, Skype). I hope that this session can be more of a provocation, they should not be using it to create a research plan for their dissertations, that would not be possible in such a short time. It should provoke the students to consider what they will need to pay attention to and consider in any digitally centred or digitally active research project, and that 'going digital' is not simple, that one is not prepared for it just because one uses Facebook, and that digitally centred or active research needs to take into account many additional points. After what you said, I'm extending the exercise to 45-60 minutes. It is part of a 2 hour session with time for feedback and Q&A in the last part of the session. I also have office hours, if necessary there may be follow up sessions with the students, but that is out of my hands. I'm going to use some of these suggestions as suggested assignments and additional tasks, particularly ethical reflection, writing and analysis. I will share this to their programme convener, and hopefully we can do more to prepare the students. Carwyn ________________________________ From: Annette Markham <amarkham@gmail.com> Sent: 17 March 2020 08:39 To: Jill Walker Rettberg <Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no>; Morris,CJ (pgr) <C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk>; air-l@aoir.org <air-l@aoir.org> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Exercises for teaching digital ethnographic methods (remotely) I like the idea of focusing on current issues as Jill mentions, but in general, I think this would be difficult in a 30 minute exercise. Maybe that could be built into the main lecture more than the exercise.... In any case, I think 30 minutes is too short for designing a study. And if I understand correctly, Carwyn, you're giving a single lecture on the topic, right? So how would they get feedback on their research design? Two key questions I would be asking if I were doing this: What is the desired learning outcome for this 30-minute exercise? And will it fit into their current skillset? Do you want them to understand the steps in designing a research project? (are they skilled at creating research design generally, so that they can translate this into whatever you're framing as 'digital?) Or do you want them to feel how tough it is to design a study in a short period of time? (cuz 30 minutes is super short). Or to review basic ethical principles? Do you want them to practice some techniques? Or consider the size and scope of a possible study? These different goals require different setup. In this situation, you might ask yourself a different question: What do you really want them to *feel or experience* during this 30 minutes? If you don't know your audience, maybe you could have them do something that makes them think about research design in a more creative and ethical way. The outcome might be 'to raise questions,' rather than to 'build skill' or 'apply'. This is what I would do, but then again, I like exercises that are more provocative than anything else. Anyway here are some exercises that take around 30 minutes that I do: To get people to consider how much their own perspective matters in what they will see as 'the field,' or what they will notice in whatever they see as the field, I use an exercise called "write the room." The goal is to do three timed writing exercises with the verbal prompt, "write the room" and no further instruction. I disrupt their viewpoint in the second and third iteration in different ways so that they might understand the challenges of trying to understand culture in the first place. Hopefully, the exercise helps them appreciate the sensibilities underpinning a qualitative perspective. And helps them consider the power of observing, and the ethical responsibilities that could go along with this power. [I've written this up and am happy to share if it's interesting to you] To get people to think about ethics, I show or discuss a specific case and have them write a reflection essay in response to it, choosing one of the ethical guidelines from a reading like the AoIR ethics guidelines or an ethics article by one of our many AoIR members who write about ethics To get people to think about emic versus etic perspectives, I show a clip from Nightmare Before Christmas, when Jack the Pumpkin King is trying to describe the concept and feeling of Christmas to Halloween Town. And then, when he fails, he goes to his lab to dissect stuffed bears, analyze the chemical makeup of a Christmas ornament, and reads a book called "scientific method" to try to understand what makes Christmas so special (this only works with certain audiences, and in regions where Christmas is the big celebration) To get people to translate traditional ethnographic techniques to digital environments, I have them choose a typical technique X (interview, observe, participate, examine artifacts) and list what is desired from each of these activities, asking the question "why do we X in the first place?" What does X yield?". Then, taking the case of a specific app/platform, reverse engineer the "what is desired" into a set of research actions/activities that would have a similar yield and would fit the actual context of study. E.g., we do interviews to elicit. One thing we desire from interviews to hear information from people directly. Interviews give us an individual's perceptions, more than information of their actual behaviors. So interviews are good for learning how people feel or what they perceive. How would we achieve these goals in wechat? Twitter? .... I'm happy to talk more about these, Annette On 3/17/20, 08:22, "Air-L on behalf of Jill Walker Rettberg" <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no> wrote: What about asking them to design an ethical research methodology for researching how people are using technology during the pandemic, or something like that? I think they're more likely to be able to focus on coursework if it's directly relevant to the worries and anxieties of their current digital life, and this might even help them feel slightly more in control of their situation. And maybe some of them will keep going and do really interesting research? Other resources: Deborah Lupton started a crowdsourced collection of resources for Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZ... The Selfie Research Network set up an online syllabus with lesson plans that would mostly work online from home. It was developed in 2014 but I think you could still use some of this. http://www.selfieresearchers.com/the-selfie-course/ Jill On 17/03/2020, 00:16, "Air-L on behalf of Morris,CJ (pgr)" <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk> wrote: Hi all, I'm now putting together lectures on digital qualitative/ethnographic/field methods for my departments undergraduate and postgraduate students. This seems like one of the few ways they will be able to safely do some of their assignments. I'll be giving this lecture via Zoom, a digital classroom. The current lecture design is: Intro -> My research background (digital ethnography of WeChat/Weibo activism) -> Understanding the digital field -> Ethics -> Q&A -> Doing ethnography in... (FB, WhatsApp, Weibo, Twitter, WeChat, Douyin/TikTok, Reddit, Insta, hashtags) -> being playful in the field -> exercise -> feedback -> final Q&A. I'm putting together a 30 minute exercise, but i was wondering if anyone had examples of successful digital, ethno/qualitative research methods exercises they've done. Particularly those that reflect on ethics, research design and methods. I'm currently planning on going basic, asking them putting together the research plan of a digitally centred study. This is open to change, but if I continue with this, does anyone have any recommendations for topics that they could do the plan for? I'd rather assign topics to the groups to help focus them in the short time period we have. Carwyn Morris PhD Candidate in Human Geography and Urban Studies Department of Geography and Environment London School of Economics Co-organiser LSE China Reading Group Tweeting @carwyn<https://twitter.com/carwyn> _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/ _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
This is fantastic! Thanks so much. ________________________________ From: Air-L <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org> on behalf of Morris,CJ (pgr) <C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 8:37 AM To: Annette Markham <amarkham@gmail.com>; Jill Walker Rettberg <Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no>; air-l@aoir.org <air-l@aoir.org> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Exercises for teaching digital ethnographic methods (remotely) Dear all, First the ideas shared so far, and then a reply to Annette 😊 Recommendations have included: 1. Jodi: trace ethnography https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fstuartgeiger.com%2fpapers... 2. From Crystal: * The exercises invite students to draw on their choice/knowledge of internet pop culture, which can be lighthearted and meta during this time. * On paralanguage short films: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwishcrys.com%2fparalangu... * On internet paralanguages: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwishcrys.com%2finternet-... * On internet celebrity: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwishcrys.com%2finternet-... * This old but gold selfie syllabus put together by several AoIR members in The Selfies Research Network is a great resource: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.selfieresearchers.com... 3. Evelina: presented fictive research cases for the students to discuss if the students taught the cases where ethical and how the students would go about to gather material in the most ethical way. Following the aoir research ethics guidelines. For reflection and not examination. 4. Jill: design an ethical research methodology for researching how people are using technology during the pandemic. Also, the Selfie Researchers and Deborah Lupton started a crowdsourced collection of resources for Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZ... 5. Kristian: building on Jill's comment, online communities popping up everywhere focusing on corona and life in quarantine, everything from how to help each other to sharing memes. So your students could design a project for researching one of these ad hoc communities. 6. Annette: * Two key questions I would be asking if I were doing this: What is the desired learning outcome for this 30-minute exercise? And will it fit into their current skillset? * Consider, what do you really want them to *feel or experience* during these sessions? What can you do in a short session? Could have them do something that makes them think about research design in a more creative and ethical way. The outcome might be 'to raise questions,' rather than to 'build skill' or 'apply'. Suggested exercises: * To get people to consider how much their own perspective matters in what they will see as 'the field,' or what they will notice in whatever they see as the field, I use an exercise called "write the room." The goal is to do three timed writing exercises with the verbal prompt, "write the room" and no further instruction. I disrupt their viewpoint in the second and third iteration in different ways so that they might understand the challenges of trying to understand culture in the first place. Hopefully, the exercise helps them appreciate the sensibilities underpinning a qualitative perspective. And helps them consider the power of observing, and the ethical responsibilities that could go along with this power. [I've written this up and am happy to share if it's interesting to you] * To get people to think about ethics, I show or discuss a specific case and have them write a reflection essay in response to it, choosing one of the ethical guidelines from a reading like the AoIR ethics guidelines or an ethics article by one of our many AoIR members who write about ethics * To get people to think about emic versus etic perspectives, I show a clip from Nightmare Before Christmas, when Jack the Pumpkin King is trying to describe the concept and feeling of Christmas to Halloween Town. And then, when he fails, he goes to his lab to dissect stuffed bears, analyze the chemical makeup of a Christmas ornament, and reads a book called "scientific method" to try to understand what makes Christmas so special (this only works with certain audiences, and in regions where Christmas is the big celebration) * To get people to translate traditional ethnographic techniques to digital environments, I have them choose a typical technique X (interview, observe, participate, examine artifacts) and list what is desired from each of these activities, asking the question "why do we X in the first place?" What does X yield?". Then, taking the case of a specific app/platform, reverse engineer the "what is desired" into a set of research actions/activities that would have a similar yield and would fit the actual context of study. E.g., we do interviews to elicit. One thing we desire from interviews to hear information from people directly. Interviews give us an individual's perceptions, more than information of their actual behaviors. So interviews are good for learning how people feel or what they perceive. How would we achieve these goals in wechat? Twitter? .... I can add other things to this last as they come. Thanks for your points, Annette. For context, this is an additional class in their methods course, and they have already done 18 lectures and seminars on methods. So I believe that they should already have a decent background in qualitative research methods. I know that ideally this topic would be an entire semester, this should not be a cut and paste job, but this is the only time the department can give me it seems (and I have to submit my thesis in 3 weeks time). As far as I can tell, if I don't do this session the students won't have a session, and time is short. During the session i aim to familiarise them with debates on digital ethics (your writing included), the importance of understanding the field (how censorship, mobility, surveillance, privacy and visibility work, boundedness and the territoriality of certain sites -> i'm a geographer), several principles to consider (based partly on Pink et al.), how the techniques they already have can be used in digitally centred research, introducing ideas of playfulness in the field (to understand the field) and then exploring several potential field sites (Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, Instagram, Weibo, WeChat, Skype). I hope that this session can be more of a provocation, they should not be using it to create a research plan for their dissertations, that would not be possible in such a short time. It should provoke the students to consider what they will need to pay attention to and consider in any digitally centred or digitally active research project, and that 'going digital' is not simple, that one is not prepared for it just because one uses Facebook, and that digitally centred or active research needs to take into account many additional points. After what you said, I'm extending the exercise to 45-60 minutes. It is part of a 2 hour session with time for feedback and Q&A in the last part of the session. I also have office hours, if necessary there may be follow up sessions with the students, but that is out of my hands. I'm going to use some of these suggestions as suggested assignments and additional tasks, particularly ethical reflection, writing and analysis. I will share this to their programme convener, and hopefully we can do more to prepare the students. Carwyn ________________________________ From: Annette Markham <amarkham@gmail.com> Sent: 17 March 2020 08:39 To: Jill Walker Rettberg <Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no>; Morris,CJ (pgr) <C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk>; air-l@aoir.org <air-l@aoir.org> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Exercises for teaching digital ethnographic methods (remotely) I like the idea of focusing on current issues as Jill mentions, but in general, I think this would be difficult in a 30 minute exercise. Maybe that could be built into the main lecture more than the exercise.... In any case, I think 30 minutes is too short for designing a study. And if I understand correctly, Carwyn, you're giving a single lecture on the topic, right? So how would they get feedback on their research design? Two key questions I would be asking if I were doing this: What is the desired learning outcome for this 30-minute exercise? And will it fit into their current skillset? Do you want them to understand the steps in designing a research project? (are they skilled at creating research design generally, so that they can translate this into whatever you're framing as 'digital?) Or do you want them to feel how tough it is to design a study in a short period of time? (cuz 30 minutes is super short). Or to review basic ethical principles? Do you want them to practice some techniques? Or consider the size and scope of a possible study? These different goals require different setup. In this situation, you might ask yourself a different question: What do you really want them to *feel or experience* during this 30 minutes? If you don't know your audience, maybe you could have them do something that makes them think about research design in a more creative and ethical way. The outcome might be 'to raise questions,' rather than to 'build skill' or 'apply'. This is what I would do, but then again, I like exercises that are more provocative than anything else. Anyway here are some exercises that take around 30 minutes that I do: To get people to consider how much their own perspective matters in what they will see as 'the field,' or what they will notice in whatever they see as the field, I use an exercise called "write the room." The goal is to do three timed writing exercises with the verbal prompt, "write the room" and no further instruction. I disrupt their viewpoint in the second and third iteration in different ways so that they might understand the challenges of trying to understand culture in the first place. Hopefully, the exercise helps them appreciate the sensibilities underpinning a qualitative perspective. And helps them consider the power of observing, and the ethical responsibilities that could go along with this power. [I've written this up and am happy to share if it's interesting to you] To get people to think about ethics, I show or discuss a specific case and have them write a reflection essay in response to it, choosing one of the ethical guidelines from a reading like the AoIR ethics guidelines or an ethics article by one of our many AoIR members who write about ethics To get people to think about emic versus etic perspectives, I show a clip from Nightmare Before Christmas, when Jack the Pumpkin King is trying to describe the concept and feeling of Christmas to Halloween Town. And then, when he fails, he goes to his lab to dissect stuffed bears, analyze the chemical makeup of a Christmas ornament, and reads a book called "scientific method" to try to understand what makes Christmas so special (this only works with certain audiences, and in regions where Christmas is the big celebration) To get people to translate traditional ethnographic techniques to digital environments, I have them choose a typical technique X (interview, observe, participate, examine artifacts) and list what is desired from each of these activities, asking the question "why do we X in the first place?" What does X yield?". Then, taking the case of a specific app/platform, reverse engineer the "what is desired" into a set of research actions/activities that would have a similar yield and would fit the actual context of study. E.g., we do interviews to elicit. One thing we desire from interviews to hear information from people directly. Interviews give us an individual's perceptions, more than information of their actual behaviors. So interviews are good for learning how people feel or what they perceive. How would we achieve these goals in wechat? Twitter? .... I'm happy to talk more about these, Annette On 3/17/20, 08:22, "Air-L on behalf of Jill Walker Rettberg" <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no> wrote: What about asking them to design an ethical research methodology for researching how people are using technology during the pandemic, or something like that? I think they're more likely to be able to focus on coursework if it's directly relevant to the worries and anxieties of their current digital life, and this might even help them feel slightly more in control of their situation. And maybe some of them will keep going and do really interesting research? Other resources: Deborah Lupton started a crowdsourced collection of resources for Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZ... The Selfie Research Network set up an online syllabus with lesson plans that would mostly work online from home. It was developed in 2014 but I think you could still use some of this. https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.selfieresearchers.com... Jill On 17/03/2020, 00:16, "Air-L on behalf of Morris,CJ (pgr)" <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk> wrote: Hi all, I'm now putting together lectures on digital qualitative/ethnographic/field methods for my departments undergraduate and postgraduate students. This seems like one of the few ways they will be able to safely do some of their assignments. I'll be giving this lecture via Zoom, a digital classroom. The current lecture design is: Intro -> My research background (digital ethnography of WeChat/Weibo activism) -> Understanding the digital field -> Ethics -> Q&A -> Doing ethnography in... (FB, WhatsApp, Weibo, Twitter, WeChat, Douyin/TikTok, Reddit, Insta, hashtags) -> being playful in the field -> exercise -> feedback -> final Q&A. I'm putting together a 30 minute exercise, but i was wondering if anyone had examples of successful digital, ethno/qualitative research methods exercises they've done. Particularly those that reflect on ethics, research design and methods. I'm currently planning on going basic, asking them putting together the research plan of a digitally centred study. This is open to change, but if I continue with this, does anyone have any recommendations for topics that they could do the plan for? I'd rather assign topics to the groups to help focus them in the short time period we have. Carwyn Morris PhD Candidate in Human Geography and Urban Studies Department of Geography and Environment London School of Economics Co-organiser LSE China Reading Group Tweeting @carwyn<https://twitter.com/carwyn> _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2faoir.org&c=E,1,KKCgMir86f... Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flistserv.aoir.org%2flisti... Join the Association of Internet Researchers: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aoir.org%2f&c=E,1,emH... _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2faoir.org&c=E,1,l7cfpM7n7J... Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flistserv.aoir.org%2flisti... Join the Association of Internet Researchers: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aoir.org%2f&c=E,1,qGI... _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2faoir.org&c=E,1,Lx1h5HOnf9... Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flistserv.aoir.org%2flisti... Join the Association of Internet Researchers: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aoir.org%2f&c=E,1,OCW...
Thanks for sharing these ideas! Annette- i‘d love to hear more. I’m just moving my whole digital discourse class online and am rethinking assessments, structures and ideas. All best, Brook On Tuesday, March 17, 2020, Andrew Herman <aherman@wlu.ca> wrote:
This is fantastic! Thanks so much. ________________________________ From: Air-L <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org> on behalf of Morris,CJ (pgr) <C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 8:37 AM To: Annette Markham <amarkham@gmail.com>; Jill Walker Rettberg < Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no>; air-l@aoir.org <air-l@aoir.org> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Exercises for teaching digital ethnographic methods (remotely)
Dear all,
First the ideas shared so far, and then a reply to Annette 😊
Recommendations have included:
1. Jodi: trace ethnography https://linkprotect.cudasvc. com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fstuartgeiger.com%2fpapers% 2ftrace-ethnography-hicss-geiger-ribes.pdf&c=E,1,Skn-lOq-_ 49tNQUAdQKxL6LRsUkv9y1mnyhTc8LNlXWipfgiYsjtlAPpJc0l8U-0Eiq_ 6rUOzhoe75c3HynBug1YLvHNC9FKg_r8lC1VN6LA8UW3dNuNuryslw,,&typo=1 2. From Crystal: * The exercises invite students to draw on their choice/knowledge of internet pop culture, which can be lighthearted and meta during this time. * On paralanguage short films: https://linkprotect.cudasvc. com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwishcrys.com%2fparalanguage-short-film%2f&c=E,1, sfxg2KTsIaAYo_mMHH7OqjYTzznJsUA3UkN0ABqZVExwgZkFTrX0pVSXdOS5FV6VaIxww4C4sz -TiyWfYAFhZUF4Acuztnxx65MmuchAQ14ieXuHo39v&typo=1 * On internet paralanguages: https://linkprotect.cudasvc. com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwishcrys.com%2finternet-paralanguages%2f&c=E,1, 9HkXSvHIz7fLcJ7sGMouknwxATgr-UwxgiIVoWKk-OxyvJjnYiybdy6P0NbKVYNVk6NWbow ZcNQPXnwzWCMRdSwZhPhzjc2Cn9ZfMQ0g2eiffDitO_5CY9ga&typo=1 * On internet celebrity: https://linkprotect.cudasvc. com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwishcrys.com%2finternet-celebrity%2f&c=E,1,- K1LwMxQlnwNHY74Y-FVNIux2TMq6R0s_xrex053zcuGqzy1NSxzPF74aHWHg_ rMtvWzguW5T_282grdYtczw493K1C_GFhkc8Uh5TW_rFC49l_-hQ,,&typo=1 * This old but gold selfie syllabus put together by several AoIR members in The Selfies Research Network is a great resource: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. selfieresearchers.com%2fthe-selfie-course%2fselfie-syllabus%2f&c=E,1, P1mDMxiOIZSo_iN4fUcFmjw-Sp8JiriD0N0BUZUBl46_3sletPzTEjBPfxb8a1_ mvaPWJioaf4lLEWi04uiF0G5hNOEoR4ZPirOau0tbEA,,&typo=1 3. Evelina: presented fictive research cases for the students to discuss if the students taught the cases where ethical and how the students would go about to gather material in the most ethical way. Following the aoir research ethics guidelines. For reflection and not examination. 4. Jill: design an ethical research methodology for researching how people are using technology during the pandemic. Also, the Selfie Researchers and Deborah Lupton started a crowdsourced collection of resources for Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic: https://docs.google.com/ document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZCl8/edit?fbclid= IwAR3mwwrXMlKTMkJxjPtQaDaHJcTtLGSC49oupIChpSWI2_bnwOtCLolZ04w 5. Kristian: building on Jill's comment, online communities popping up everywhere focusing on corona and life in quarantine, everything from how to help each other to sharing memes. So your students could design a project for researching one of these ad hoc communities. 6. Annette: * Two key questions I would be asking if I were doing this: What is the desired learning outcome for this 30-minute exercise? And will it fit into their current skillset? * Consider, what do you really want them to *feel or experience* during these sessions? What can you do in a short session? Could have them do something that makes them think about research design in a more creative and ethical way. The outcome might be 'to raise questions,' rather than to 'build skill' or 'apply'. Suggested exercises: * To get people to consider how much their own perspective matters in what they will see as 'the field,' or what they will notice in whatever they see as the field, I use an exercise called "write the room." The goal is to do three timed writing exercises with the verbal prompt, "write the room" and no further instruction. I disrupt their viewpoint in the second and third iteration in different ways so that they might understand the challenges of trying to understand culture in the first place. Hopefully, the exercise helps them appreciate the sensibilities underpinning a qualitative perspective. And helps them consider the power of observing, and the ethical responsibilities that could go along with this power. [I've written this up and am happy to share if it's interesting to you] * To get people to think about ethics, I show or discuss a specific case and have them write a reflection essay in response to it, choosing one of the ethical guidelines from a reading like the AoIR ethics guidelines or an ethics article by one of our many AoIR members who write about ethics * To get people to think about emic versus etic perspectives, I show a clip from Nightmare Before Christmas, when Jack the Pumpkin King is trying to describe the concept and feeling of Christmas to Halloween Town. And then, when he fails, he goes to his lab to dissect stuffed bears, analyze the chemical makeup of a Christmas ornament, and reads a book called "scientific method" to try to understand what makes Christmas so special (this only works with certain audiences, and in regions where Christmas is the big celebration) * To get people to translate traditional ethnographic techniques to digital environments, I have them choose a typical technique X (interview, observe, participate, examine artifacts) and list what is desired from each of these activities, asking the question "why do we X in the first place?" What does X yield?". Then, taking the case of a specific app/platform, reverse engineer the "what is desired" into a set of research actions/activities that would have a similar yield and would fit the actual context of study. E.g., we do interviews to elicit. One thing we desire from interviews to hear information from people directly. Interviews give us an individual's perceptions, more than information of their actual behaviors. So interviews are good for learning how people feel or what they perceive. How would we achieve these goals in wechat? Twitter? ....
I can add other things to this last as they come.
Thanks for your points, Annette. For context, this is an additional class in their methods course, and they have already done 18 lectures and seminars on methods. So I believe that they should already have a decent background in qualitative research methods. I know that ideally this topic would be an entire semester, this should not be a cut and paste job, but this is the only time the department can give me it seems (and I have to submit my thesis in 3 weeks time). As far as I can tell, if I don't do this session the students won't have a session, and time is short.
During the session i aim to familiarise them with debates on digital ethics (your writing included), the importance of understanding the field (how censorship, mobility, surveillance, privacy and visibility work, boundedness and the territoriality of certain sites -> i'm a geographer), several principles to consider (based partly on Pink et al.), how the techniques they already have can be used in digitally centred research, introducing ideas of playfulness in the field (to understand the field) and then exploring several potential field sites (Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, Instagram, Weibo, WeChat, Skype). I hope that this session can be more of a provocation, they should not be using it to create a research plan for their dissertations, that would not be possible in such a short time. It should provoke the students to consider what they will need to pay attention to and consider in any digitally centred or digitally active research project, and that 'going digital' is not simple, that one is not prepared for it just because one uses Facebook, and that digitally centred or active research needs to take into account many additional points.
After what you said, I'm extending the exercise to 45-60 minutes. It is part of a 2 hour session with time for feedback and Q&A in the last part of the session. I also have office hours, if necessary there may be follow up sessions with the students, but that is out of my hands. I'm going to use some of these suggestions as suggested assignments and additional tasks, particularly ethical reflection, writing and analysis. I will share this to their programme convener, and hopefully we can do more to prepare the students.
Carwyn
________________________________ From: Annette Markham <amarkham@gmail.com> Sent: 17 March 2020 08:39 To: Jill Walker Rettberg <Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no>; Morris,CJ (pgr) < C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk>; air-l@aoir.org <air-l@aoir.org> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Exercises for teaching digital ethnographic methods (remotely)
I like the idea of focusing on current issues as Jill mentions, but in general, I think this would be difficult in a 30 minute exercise. Maybe that could be built into the main lecture more than the exercise.... In any case, I think 30 minutes is too short for designing a study. And if I understand correctly, Carwyn, you're giving a single lecture on the topic, right? So how would they get feedback on their research design?
Two key questions I would be asking if I were doing this: What is the desired learning outcome for this 30-minute exercise? And will it fit into their current skillset?
Do you want them to understand the steps in designing a research project? (are they skilled at creating research design generally, so that they can translate this into whatever you're framing as 'digital?) Or do you want them to feel how tough it is to design a study in a short period of time? (cuz 30 minutes is super short). Or to review basic ethical principles? Do you want them to practice some techniques? Or consider the size and scope of a possible study? These different goals require different setup.
In this situation, you might ask yourself a different question: What do you really want them to *feel or experience* during this 30 minutes? If you don't know your audience, maybe you could have them do something that makes them think about research design in a more creative and ethical way. The outcome might be 'to raise questions,' rather than to 'build skill' or 'apply'. This is what I would do, but then again, I like exercises that are more provocative than anything else.
Anyway here are some exercises that take around 30 minutes that I do:
To get people to consider how much their own perspective matters in what they will see as 'the field,' or what they will notice in whatever they see as the field, I use an exercise called "write the room." The goal is to do three timed writing exercises with the verbal prompt, "write the room" and no further instruction. I disrupt their viewpoint in the second and third iteration in different ways so that they might understand the challenges of trying to understand culture in the first place. Hopefully, the exercise helps them appreciate the sensibilities underpinning a qualitative perspective. And helps them consider the power of observing, and the ethical responsibilities that could go along with this power. [I've written this up and am happy to share if it's interesting to you]
To get people to think about ethics, I show or discuss a specific case and have them write a reflection essay in response to it, choosing one of the ethical guidelines from a reading like the AoIR ethics guidelines or an ethics article by one of our many AoIR members who write about ethics
To get people to think about emic versus etic perspectives, I show a clip from Nightmare Before Christmas, when Jack the Pumpkin King is trying to describe the concept and feeling of Christmas to Halloween Town. And then, when he fails, he goes to his lab to dissect stuffed bears, analyze the chemical makeup of a Christmas ornament, and reads a book called "scientific method" to try to understand what makes Christmas so special (this only works with certain audiences, and in regions where Christmas is the big celebration)
To get people to translate traditional ethnographic techniques to digital environments, I have them choose a typical technique X (interview, observe, participate, examine artifacts) and list what is desired from each of these activities, asking the question "why do we X in the first place?" What does X yield?". Then, taking the case of a specific app/platform, reverse engineer the "what is desired" into a set of research actions/activities that would have a similar yield and would fit the actual context of study. E.g., we do interviews to elicit. One thing we desire from interviews to hear information from people directly. Interviews give us an individual's perceptions, more than information of their actual behaviors. So interviews are good for learning how people feel or what they perceive. How would we achieve these goals in wechat? Twitter? ....
I'm happy to talk more about these,
Annette
On 3/17/20, 08:22, "Air-L on behalf of Jill Walker Rettberg" < air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no> wrote:
What about asking them to design an ethical research methodology for researching how people are using technology during the pandemic, or something like that? I think they're more likely to be able to focus on coursework if it's directly relevant to the worries and anxieties of their current digital life, and this might even help them feel slightly more in control of their situation. And maybe some of them will keep going and do really interesting research?
Other resources:
Deborah Lupton started a crowdsourced collection of resources for Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic: https://docs.google.com/document/d/ 1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZCl8/edit?fbclid= IwAR3mwwrXMlKTMkJxjPtQaDaHJcTtLGSC49oupIChpSWI2_bnwOtCLolZ04w
The Selfie Research Network set up an online syllabus with lesson plans that would mostly work online from home. It was developed in 2014 but I think you could still use some of this. https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. selfieresearchers.com%2fthe-selfie-course%2f&c=E,1, MxEpCjuuwvGdNXubv7TD58Szc3yN_hAt9i7dORTM-g6n46i7ooxIG71mSWBHzN029qcFGFr MQnxcpaqvTYbzWMdlNCAfmWCmxhB_6NrDuOm6rYE,&typo=1
Jill
On 17/03/2020, 00:16, "Air-L on behalf of Morris,CJ (pgr)" < air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm now putting together lectures on digital qualitative/ethnographic/field methods for my departments undergraduate and postgraduate students. This seems like one of the few ways they will be able to safely do some of their assignments. I'll be giving this lecture via Zoom, a digital classroom.
The current lecture design is: Intro -> My research background (digital ethnography of WeChat/Weibo activism) -> Understanding the digital field -> Ethics -> Q&A -> Doing ethnography in... (FB, WhatsApp, Weibo, Twitter, WeChat, Douyin/TikTok, Reddit, Insta, hashtags) -> being playful in the field -> exercise -> feedback -> final Q&A.
I'm putting together a 30 minute exercise, but i was wondering if anyone had examples of successful digital, ethno/qualitative research methods exercises they've done. Particularly those that reflect on ethics, research design and methods.
I'm currently planning on going basic, asking them putting together the research plan of a digitally centred study. This is open to change, but if I continue with this, does anyone have any recommendations for topics that they could do the plan for? I'd rather assign topics to the groups to help focus them in the short time period we have.
Carwyn Morris PhD Candidate in Human Geography and Urban Studies Department of Geography and Environment London School of Economics Co-organiser LSE China Reading Group Tweeting @carwyn<https://twitter.com/carwyn> _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2faoir.org&c=E,1, KKCgMir86fJMQNADQgIxJGIHFB8IVm9MpDJ4sIIXbaqFQcPtWDQ_ vjyszwFId1Y0337V5ABu308zm7czaurVNfEaY7ILcd-_-u7kVT6dL2fzJLQ- xD03NI0,&typo=1 Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flistserv.aoir.org% 2flistinfo.cgi%2fair-l-aoir.org&c=E,1,EerNPVETcP3g7Q0o7WkD_ hh4UdasOQSmLm6q3_2HgQMeigBEdufVRwJolmPSbC_bEBJ9f3KWjKLGuhaHPgcW1hkvv8WxG hW8pK5NZCcYmcc6lvgWjw,,&typo=1
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. aoir.org%2f&c=E,1,emHgVYQaNZCPSP8XtroKceM7pMyq4z mcz0rGRBV58Sm6MmJG5AMyhGsbbliqrRjOVtuCQBrkAoSQoDA- jJFlIFxXA7-rC3RpNMQDoQwS&typo=1
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2faoir.org&c=E,1, l7cfpM7n7Js863RKTAnwqJf1VEy-iJTF1Zf9S4y_MV0_JTlB3WHPVIDIh_ kM56Dbtf4fsMWeGiD7f2vTWTSr94BEDACMrVu6ArQa_veZgxNiPDrtUXSfOQ,,&typo=1 Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flistserv.aoir.org% 2flistinfo.cgi%2fair-l-aoir.org&c=E,1,3ErR8gS5nrCG359pSqSOYRcBrX5ck0 EyEdx6qvaUxeOYtFiGS1rFYVKNFw_m3fkWxX60L_yGo7T0YHdUgiwFnpLRXKxPdovNijv1 Or5lOasc5abRiz-diVKP3gWN&typo=1
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. aoir.org%2f&c=E,1,qGI8s7bl9773yoPo3h9OL5O-hzHgnKmCrJcDFCt73uyrubGjfimWaq YDv2cpf6LerDVsOMgsXNY-qgKLavE3VfUsltippKodOwBFJRQkF9 1EKWYYD6N4K-0oIyc,&typo=1
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2faoir.org&c=E,1, Lx1h5HOnf9JFOjIR9OkqmZ06bjua3oHT8xXPSVFQ9hWNvVN4Uw-lwioUt13fSynlovOci_ 7rr8jdy71aVDCZQygoYktiJuQjF0zEwmkBAThKrA,,&typo=1 Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: https://linkprotect.cudasvc. com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flistserv.aoir.org%2flistinfo.cgi%2fair-l-aoir. org&c=E,1,JlChhUJHST75LP_2jAEJiQoyk3CTX70LQmXFvlXjKmtdj TtqtBc6yG9qBPcXW7vaLc54rANJsBvSKkeUuk6KTeheopTgGducNMJ5Ip8nX ng1rSVcyFPN3E6ivQ,,&typo=1
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aoir.org%2f&c=E,1, OCWD3KjSVWo1pOm3n_Deeec7Ao37Q06EIi1mfPSO4fXPflpL w7pnwJgPjUm59K2KDFRuFoxFi1Hno81a-MIUT_qS9xwyWUNPocS8dG6MNL6xjY5L_ o69cGK0eyP3&typo=1 _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/ listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
I've hesitated to chime in here - because - well where do I start?:) Been teaching online for a while now and have used several kinds of assignments to get students (undergrad and grad) to think through digital living and digital immersion. Others here (Annette, Jill - the usual "suspects" doing this work really well already:)) have already given great suggestions. If you need to brainstorm I can email off list too. r " The current lecture design is: Intro -> My research background (digital ethnography of WeChat/Weibo activism) -> Understanding the digital field -> Ethics -> Q&A -> Doing ethnography in... (FB, WhatsApp, Weibo, Twitter, WeChat, Douyin/TikTok, Reddit, Insta, hashtags) -> being playful in the field -> exercise -> feedback -> final Q&A. I'm putting together a 30 minute exercise, but i was wondering if anyone had examples of successful digital, ethno/qualitative research methods exercises they've done. Particularly those that reflect on ethics, research design and methods. "___ Radhika Gajjala Managing Editor: Fembot Collective Co-editor of Ada: Journal of Gender and New Media (adanewmedia.org) Professor, School of Media and Communication and American Culture Studies Program Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green Ohio http://www.radhikagajjala.org On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 6:42 PM brook bolander <brookbolander@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for sharing these ideas! Annette- i‘d love to hear more. I’m just moving my whole digital discourse class online and am rethinking assessments, structures and ideas. All best, Brook
On Tuesday, March 17, 2020, Andrew Herman <aherman@wlu.ca> wrote:
This is fantastic! Thanks so much. ________________________________ From: Air-L <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org> on behalf of Morris,CJ (pgr) <C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 8:37 AM To: Annette Markham <amarkham@gmail.com>; Jill Walker Rettberg < Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no>; air-l@aoir.org <air-l@aoir.org> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Exercises for teaching digital ethnographic methods (remotely)
Dear all,
First the ideas shared so far, and then a reply to Annette 😊
Recommendations have included:
1. Jodi: trace ethnography https://linkprotect.cudasvc. com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fstuartgeiger.com%2fpapers% 2ftrace-ethnography-hicss-geiger-ribes.pdf&c=E,1,Skn-lOq-_ 49tNQUAdQKxL6LRsUkv9y1mnyhTc8LNlXWipfgiYsjtlAPpJc0l8U-0Eiq_ 6rUOzhoe75c3HynBug1YLvHNC9FKg_r8lC1VN6LA8UW3dNuNuryslw,,&typo=1 2. From Crystal: * The exercises invite students to draw on their choice/knowledge of internet pop culture, which can be lighthearted and meta during this time. * On paralanguage short films: https://linkprotect.cudasvc. com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwishcrys.com%2fparalanguage-short-film%2f&c=E,1,
sfxg2KTsIaAYo_mMHH7OqjYTzznJsUA3UkN0ABqZVExwgZkFTrX0pVSXdOS5FV6VaIxww4C4sz
-TiyWfYAFhZUF4Acuztnxx65MmuchAQ14ieXuHo39v&typo=1 * On internet paralanguages: https://linkprotect.cudasvc. com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwishcrys.com%2finternet-paralanguages%2f&c=E,1, 9HkXSvHIz7fLcJ7sGMouknwxATgr-UwxgiIVoWKk-OxyvJjnYiybdy6P0NbKVYNVk6NWbow ZcNQPXnwzWCMRdSwZhPhzjc2Cn9ZfMQ0g2eiffDitO_5CY9ga&typo=1 * On internet celebrity: https://linkprotect.cudasvc. com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwishcrys.com%2finternet-celebrity%2f&c=E,1,- K1LwMxQlnwNHY74Y-FVNIux2TMq6R0s_xrex053zcuGqzy1NSxzPF74aHWHg_ rMtvWzguW5T_282grdYtczw493K1C_GFhkc8Uh5TW_rFC49l_-hQ,,&typo=1 * This old but gold selfie syllabus put together by several AoIR members in The Selfies Research Network is a great resource: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. selfieresearchers.com%2fthe-selfie-course%2fselfie-syllabus%2f&c=E,1, P1mDMxiOIZSo_iN4fUcFmjw-Sp8JiriD0N0BUZUBl46_3sletPzTEjBPfxb8a1_ mvaPWJioaf4lLEWi04uiF0G5hNOEoR4ZPirOau0tbEA,,&typo=1 3. Evelina: presented fictive research cases for the students to discuss if the students taught the cases where ethical and how the students would go about to gather material in the most ethical way. Following the aoir research ethics guidelines. For reflection and not examination. 4. Jill: design an ethical research methodology for researching how people are using technology during the pandemic. Also, the Selfie Researchers and Deborah Lupton started a crowdsourced collection of resources for Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic: https://docs.google.com/ document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZCl8/edit?fbclid= IwAR3mwwrXMlKTMkJxjPtQaDaHJcTtLGSC49oupIChpSWI2_bnwOtCLolZ04w 5. Kristian: building on Jill's comment, online communities popping up everywhere focusing on corona and life in quarantine, everything from how to help each other to sharing memes. So your students could design a project for researching one of these ad hoc communities. 6. Annette: * Two key questions I would be asking if I were doing this: What is the desired learning outcome for this 30-minute exercise? And will it fit into their current skillset? * Consider, what do you really want them to *feel or experience* during these sessions? What can you do in a short session? Could have them do something that makes them think about research design in a more creative and ethical way. The outcome might be 'to raise questions,' rather than to 'build skill' or 'apply'. Suggested exercises: * To get people to consider how much their own perspective matters in what they will see as 'the field,' or what they will notice in whatever they see as the field, I use an exercise called "write the room." The goal is to do three timed writing exercises with the verbal prompt, "write the room" and no further instruction. I disrupt their viewpoint in the second and third iteration in different ways so that they might understand the challenges of trying to understand culture in the first place. Hopefully, the exercise helps them appreciate the sensibilities underpinning a qualitative perspective. And helps them consider the power of observing, and the ethical responsibilities that could go along with this power. [I've written this up and am happy to share if it's interesting to you] * To get people to think about ethics, I show or discuss a specific case and have them write a reflection essay in response to it, choosing one of the ethical guidelines from a reading like the AoIR ethics guidelines or an ethics article by one of our many AoIR members who write about ethics * To get people to think about emic versus etic perspectives, I show a clip from Nightmare Before Christmas, when Jack the Pumpkin King is trying to describe the concept and feeling of Christmas to Halloween Town. And then, when he fails, he goes to his lab to dissect stuffed bears, analyze the chemical makeup of a Christmas ornament, and reads a book called "scientific method" to try to understand what makes Christmas so special (this only works with certain audiences, and in regions where Christmas is the big celebration) * To get people to translate traditional ethnographic techniques to digital environments, I have them choose a typical technique X (interview, observe, participate, examine artifacts) and list what is desired from each of these activities, asking the question "why do we X in the first place?" What does X yield?". Then, taking the case of a specific app/platform, reverse engineer the "what is desired" into a set of research actions/activities that would have a similar yield and would fit the actual context of study. E.g., we do interviews to elicit. One thing we desire from interviews to hear information from people directly. Interviews give us an individual's perceptions, more than information of their actual behaviors. So interviews are good for learning how people feel or what they perceive. How would we achieve these goals in wechat? Twitter? ....
I can add other things to this last as they come.
Thanks for your points, Annette. For context, this is an additional class in their methods course, and they have already done 18 lectures and seminars on methods. So I believe that they should already have a decent background in qualitative research methods. I know that ideally this topic would be an entire semester, this should not be a cut and paste job, but this is the only time the department can give me it seems (and I have to submit my thesis in 3 weeks time). As far as I can tell, if I don't do this session the students won't have a session, and time is short.
During the session i aim to familiarise them with debates on digital ethics (your writing included), the importance of understanding the field (how censorship, mobility, surveillance, privacy and visibility work, boundedness and the territoriality of certain sites -> i'm a geographer), several principles to consider (based partly on Pink et al.), how the techniques they already have can be used in digitally centred research, introducing ideas of playfulness in the field (to understand the field) and then exploring several potential field sites (Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, Instagram, Weibo, WeChat, Skype). I hope that this session can be more of a provocation, they should not be using it to create a research plan for their dissertations, that would not be possible in such a short time. It should provoke the students to consider what they will need to pay attention to and consider in any digitally centred or digitally active research project, and that 'going digital' is not simple, that one is not prepared for it just because one uses Facebook, and that digitally centred or active research needs to take into account many additional points.
After what you said, I'm extending the exercise to 45-60 minutes. It is part of a 2 hour session with time for feedback and Q&A in the last part of the session. I also have office hours, if necessary there may be follow up sessions with the students, but that is out of my hands. I'm going to use some of these suggestions as suggested assignments and additional tasks, particularly ethical reflection, writing and analysis. I will share this to their programme convener, and hopefully we can do more to prepare the students.
Carwyn
________________________________ From: Annette Markham <amarkham@gmail.com> Sent: 17 March 2020 08:39 To: Jill Walker Rettberg <Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no>; Morris,CJ (pgr) < C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk>; air-l@aoir.org <air-l@aoir.org> Subject: Re: [Air-L] Exercises for teaching digital ethnographic methods (remotely)
I like the idea of focusing on current issues as Jill mentions, but in general, I think this would be difficult in a 30 minute exercise. Maybe that could be built into the main lecture more than the exercise.... In any case, I think 30 minutes is too short for designing a study. And if I understand correctly, Carwyn, you're giving a single lecture on the topic, right? So how would they get feedback on their research design?
Two key questions I would be asking if I were doing this: What is the desired learning outcome for this 30-minute exercise? And will it fit into their current skillset?
Do you want them to understand the steps in designing a research project? (are they skilled at creating research design generally, so that they can translate this into whatever you're framing as 'digital?) Or do you want them to feel how tough it is to design a study in a short period of time? (cuz 30 minutes is super short). Or to review basic ethical principles? Do you want them to practice some techniques? Or consider the size and scope of a possible study? These different goals require different setup.
In this situation, you might ask yourself a different question: What do you really want them to *feel or experience* during this 30 minutes? If you don't know your audience, maybe you could have them do something that makes them think about research design in a more creative and ethical way. The outcome might be 'to raise questions,' rather than to 'build skill' or 'apply'. This is what I would do, but then again, I like exercises that are more provocative than anything else.
Anyway here are some exercises that take around 30 minutes that I do:
To get people to consider how much their own perspective matters in what they will see as 'the field,' or what they will notice in whatever they see as the field, I use an exercise called "write the room." The goal is to do three timed writing exercises with the verbal prompt, "write the room" and no further instruction. I disrupt their viewpoint in the second and third iteration in different ways so that they might understand the challenges of trying to understand culture in the first place. Hopefully, the exercise helps them appreciate the sensibilities underpinning a qualitative perspective. And helps them consider the power of observing, and the ethical responsibilities that could go along with this power. [I've written this up and am happy to share if it's interesting to you]
To get people to think about ethics, I show or discuss a specific case and have them write a reflection essay in response to it, choosing one of the ethical guidelines from a reading like the AoIR ethics guidelines or an ethics article by one of our many AoIR members who write about ethics
To get people to think about emic versus etic perspectives, I show a clip from Nightmare Before Christmas, when Jack the Pumpkin King is trying to describe the concept and feeling of Christmas to Halloween Town. And then, when he fails, he goes to his lab to dissect stuffed bears, analyze the chemical makeup of a Christmas ornament, and reads a book called "scientific method" to try to understand what makes Christmas so special (this only works with certain audiences, and in regions where Christmas is the big celebration)
To get people to translate traditional ethnographic techniques to digital environments, I have them choose a typical technique X (interview, observe, participate, examine artifacts) and list what is desired from each of these activities, asking the question "why do we X in the first place?" What does X yield?". Then, taking the case of a specific app/platform, reverse engineer the "what is desired" into a set of research actions/activities that would have a similar yield and would fit the actual context of study. E.g., we do interviews to elicit. One thing we desire from interviews to hear information from people directly. Interviews give us an individual's perceptions, more than information of their actual behaviors. So interviews are good for learning how people feel or what they perceive. How would we achieve these goals in wechat? Twitter? ....
I'm happy to talk more about these,
Annette
On 3/17/20, 08:22, "Air-L on behalf of Jill Walker Rettberg" < air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no
wrote:
What about asking them to design an ethical research methodology for researching how people are using technology during the pandemic, or something like that? I think they're more likely to be able to focus on coursework if it's directly relevant to the worries and anxieties of their current digital life, and this might even help them feel slightly more in control of their situation. And maybe some of them will keep going and do really interesting research?
Other resources:
Deborah Lupton started a crowdsourced collection of resources for Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic: https://docs.google.com/document/d/ 1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZCl8/edit?fbclid= IwAR3mwwrXMlKTMkJxjPtQaDaHJcTtLGSC49oupIChpSWI2_bnwOtCLolZ04w
The Selfie Research Network set up an online syllabus with lesson plans that would mostly work online from home. It was developed in 2014 but I think you could still use some of this. https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. selfieresearchers.com%2fthe-selfie-course%2f&c=E,1, MxEpCjuuwvGdNXubv7TD58Szc3yN_hAt9i7dORTM-g6n46i7ooxIG71mSWBHzN029qcFGFr MQnxcpaqvTYbzWMdlNCAfmWCmxhB_6NrDuOm6rYE,&typo=1
Jill
On 17/03/2020, 00:16, "Air-L on behalf of Morris,CJ (pgr)" < air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm now putting together lectures on digital qualitative/ethnographic/field methods for my departments undergraduate and postgraduate students. This seems like one of the few ways they will be able to safely do some of their assignments. I'll be giving this lecture via Zoom, a digital classroom.
The current lecture design is: Intro -> My research background (digital ethnography of WeChat/Weibo activism) -> Understanding the digital field -> Ethics -> Q&A -> Doing ethnography in... (FB, WhatsApp, Weibo, Twitter, WeChat, Douyin/TikTok, Reddit, Insta, hashtags) -> being playful in the field -> exercise -> feedback -> final Q&A.
I'm putting together a 30 minute exercise, but i was wondering if anyone had examples of successful digital, ethno/qualitative research methods exercises they've done. Particularly those that reflect on ethics, research design and methods.
I'm currently planning on going basic, asking them putting together the research plan of a digitally centred study. This is open to change, but if I continue with this, does anyone have any recommendations for topics that they could do the plan for? I'd rather assign topics to the groups to help focus them in the short time period we have.
Carwyn Morris PhD Candidate in Human Geography and Urban Studies Department of Geography and Environment London School of Economics Co-organiser LSE China Reading Group Tweeting @carwyn<https://twitter.com/carwyn> _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2faoir.org&c=E,1, KKCgMir86fJMQNADQgIxJGIHFB8IVm9MpDJ4sIIXbaqFQcPtWDQ_ vjyszwFId1Y0337V5ABu308zm7czaurVNfEaY7ILcd-_-u7kVT6dL2fzJLQ- xD03NI0,&typo=1 Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flistserv.aoir.org% 2flistinfo.cgi%2fair-l-aoir.org&c=E,1,EerNPVETcP3g7Q0o7WkD_ hh4UdasOQSmLm6q3_2HgQMeigBEdufVRwJolmPSbC_bEBJ9f3KWjKLGuhaHPgcW1hkvv8WxG hW8pK5NZCcYmcc6lvgWjw,,&typo=1
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. aoir.org%2f&c=E,1,emHgVYQaNZCPSP8XtroKceM7pMyq4z mcz0rGRBV58Sm6MmJG5AMyhGsbbliqrRjOVtuCQBrkAoSQoDA- jJFlIFxXA7-rC3RpNMQDoQwS&typo=1
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2faoir.org&c=E,1, l7cfpM7n7Js863RKTAnwqJf1VEy-iJTF1Zf9S4y_MV0_JTlB3WHPVIDIh_ kM56Dbtf4fsMWeGiD7f2vTWTSr94BEDACMrVu6ArQa_veZgxNiPDrtUXSfOQ,,&typo=1 Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flistserv.aoir.org% 2flistinfo.cgi%2fair-l-aoir.org&c=E,1,3ErR8gS5nrCG359pSqSOYRcBrX5ck0 EyEdx6qvaUxeOYtFiGS1rFYVKNFw_m3fkWxX60L_yGo7T0YHdUgiwFnpLRXKxPdovNijv1 Or5lOasc5abRiz-diVKP3gWN&typo=1
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. aoir.org%2f&c=E,1,qGI8s7bl9773yoPo3h9OL5O-hzHgnKmCrJcDFCt73uyrubGjfimWaq YDv2cpf6LerDVsOMgsXNY-qgKLavE3VfUsltippKodOwBFJRQkF9 1EKWYYD6N4K-0oIyc,&typo=1
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2faoir.org&c=E,1, Lx1h5HOnf9JFOjIR9OkqmZ06bjua3oHT8xXPSVFQ9hWNvVN4Uw-lwioUt13fSynlovOci_ 7rr8jdy71aVDCZQygoYktiJuQjF0zEwmkBAThKrA,,&typo=1 Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: https://linkprotect.cudasvc . com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flistserv.aoir.org%2flistinfo.cgi%2fair-l-aoir. org&c=E,1,JlChhUJHST75LP_2jAEJiQoyk3CTX70LQmXFvlXjKmtdj TtqtBc6yG9qBPcXW7vaLc54rANJsBvSKkeUuk6KTeheopTgGducNMJ5Ip8nX ng1rSVcyFPN3E6ivQ,,&typo=1
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aoir.org%2f&c=E,1 , OCWD3KjSVWo1pOm3n_Deeec7Ao37Q06EIi1mfPSO4fXPflpL w7pnwJgPjUm59K2KDFRuFoxFi1Hno81a-MIUT_qS9xwyWUNPocS8dG6MNL6xjY5L_ o69cGK0eyP3&typo=1 _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/ listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Hi Carwyn and everyone, I know you already have access to this as one of our core IRL members Carwyn, but I thought it was worth sending out an updated version of the LSE Digital Ethnography Collective reading list, which has some awesome new readings on it: https://tinyurl.com/rpc92zy This should be of use to anyone currently teaching or planning to teach digital ethnography: If anyone on this list feels so inclined, it would be greatly appreciated if you could share our tweet about this to help researchers starting out with digital ethnography: https://twitter.com/DigEthnogLSE/status/1240233935617101827 I also thought it would be worth sharing the livestream and slides for our recent session with Sarah Quinton on 'Ethics in digital ethnographic research'. The slides are full of good advice, as well as useful references at the end. Livestream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyRvZgCzhSk&t Slides: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cigCab-yBxgyjvh35Jx4WXqO4c6-NnY4/view?usp=s... I hope you're all well and staying safe in these unsettling times <3 All the best, Zoe ________________________ Zoë Glatt www.zoeglatt.com <http://www.zoeglatt.com/> ESRC PhD Researcher in Media & Communications London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) Managing Editor: Communication, Culture & Critique Co-Founder: LSE Digital Ethnography Collective @DigEthnogLSE <https://twitter.com/DigEthnogLSE> Graduate Student Rep: Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) Associate Lecturer in Media & Communications (2019/20): Goldsmiths University YouTube channel <https://www.youtube.com/user/Zedstergal> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/ZoeGlatt> | LSE bio <http://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/people/phd-researchers/zoe-glatt> On 18/03/2020, 10:33, "Air-L on behalf of Radhika G" <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of gradhika2012@gmail.com> wrote: I've hesitated to chime in here - because - well where do I start?:) Been teaching online for a while now and have used several kinds of assignments to get students (undergrad and grad) to think through digital living and digital immersion. Others here (Annette, Jill - the usual "suspects" doing this work really well already:)) have already given great suggestions. If you need to brainstorm I can email off list too. r " The current lecture design is: Intro -> My research background (digital ethnography of WeChat/Weibo activism) -> Understanding the digital field -> Ethics -> Q&A -> Doing ethnography in... (FB, WhatsApp, Weibo, Twitter, WeChat, Douyin/TikTok, Reddit, Insta, hashtags) -> being playful in the field -> exercise -> feedback -> final Q&A. I'm putting together a 30 minute exercise, but i was wondering if anyone had examples of successful digital, ethno/qualitative research methods exercises they've done. Particularly those that reflect on ethics, research design and methods. "___ Radhika Gajjala Managing Editor: Fembot Collective Co-editor of Ada: Journal of Gender and New Media (adanewmedia.org) Professor, School of Media and Communication and American Culture Studies Program Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green Ohio http://www.radhikagajjala.org On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 6:42 PM brook bolander <brookbolander@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for sharing these ideas! > Annette- i‘d love to hear more. I’m just moving my whole digital discourse > class online and am rethinking assessments, structures and ideas. > All best, > Brook > > > On Tuesday, March 17, 2020, Andrew Herman <aherman@wlu.ca> wrote: > > > This is fantastic! Thanks so much. > > ________________________________ > > From: Air-L <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org> on behalf of Morris,CJ > > (pgr) <C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 8:37 AM > > To: Annette Markham <amarkham@gmail.com>; Jill Walker Rettberg < > > Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no>; air-l@aoir.org <air-l@aoir.org> > > Subject: Re: [Air-L] Exercises for teaching digital ethnographic methods > > (remotely) > > > > Dear all, > > > > First the ideas shared so far, and then a reply to Annette 😊 > > > > Recommendations have included: > > > > 1. Jodi: trace ethnography https://linkprotect.cudasvc. > > com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fstuartgeiger.com%2fpapers% > > 2ftrace-ethnography-hicss-geiger-ribes.pdf&c=E,1,Skn-lOq-_ > > 49tNQUAdQKxL6LRsUkv9y1mnyhTc8LNlXWipfgiYsjtlAPpJc0l8U-0Eiq_ > > 6rUOzhoe75c3HynBug1YLvHNC9FKg_r8lC1VN6LA8UW3dNuNuryslw,,&typo=1 > > 2. From Crystal: > > * The exercises invite students to draw on their choice/knowledge > > of internet pop culture, which can be lighthearted and meta during this > > time. > > * On paralanguage short films: https://linkprotect.cudasvc. > > com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwishcrys.com%2fparalanguage-short-film%2f&c=E,1, > > > sfxg2KTsIaAYo_mMHH7OqjYTzznJsUA3UkN0ABqZVExwgZkFTrX0pVSXdOS5FV6VaIxww4C4sz > > -TiyWfYAFhZUF4Acuztnxx65MmuchAQ14ieXuHo39v&typo=1 > > * On internet paralanguages: https://linkprotect.cudasvc. > > com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwishcrys.com%2finternet-paralanguages%2f&c=E,1, > > 9HkXSvHIz7fLcJ7sGMouknwxATgr-UwxgiIVoWKk-OxyvJjnYiybdy6P0NbKVYNVk6NWbow > > ZcNQPXnwzWCMRdSwZhPhzjc2Cn9ZfMQ0g2eiffDitO_5CY9ga&typo=1 > > * On internet celebrity: https://linkprotect.cudasvc. > > com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwishcrys.com%2finternet-celebrity%2f&c=E,1,- > > K1LwMxQlnwNHY74Y-FVNIux2TMq6R0s_xrex053zcuGqzy1NSxzPF74aHWHg_ > > rMtvWzguW5T_282grdYtczw493K1C_GFhkc8Uh5TW_rFC49l_-hQ,,&typo=1 > > * This old but gold selfie syllabus put together by several AoIR > > members in The Selfies Research Network is a great resource: > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. > > selfieresearchers.com%2fthe-selfie-course%2fselfie-syllabus%2f&c=E,1, > > P1mDMxiOIZSo_iN4fUcFmjw-Sp8JiriD0N0BUZUBl46_3sletPzTEjBPfxb8a1_ > > mvaPWJioaf4lLEWi04uiF0G5hNOEoR4ZPirOau0tbEA,,&typo=1 > > 3. Evelina: presented fictive research cases for the students to > > discuss if the students taught the cases where ethical and how the > students > > would go about to gather material in the most ethical way. Following the > > aoir research ethics guidelines. For reflection and not examination. > > 4. Jill: design an ethical research methodology for researching how > > people are using technology during the pandemic. Also, the Selfie > > Researchers and Deborah Lupton started a crowdsourced collection of > > resources for Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic: https://docs.google.com/ > > document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZCl8/edit?fbclid= > > IwAR3mwwrXMlKTMkJxjPtQaDaHJcTtLGSC49oupIChpSWI2_bnwOtCLolZ04w > > 5. Kristian: building on Jill's comment, online communities popping up > > everywhere focusing on corona and life in quarantine, everything from how > > to help each other to sharing memes. So your students could design a > > project for researching one of these ad hoc communities. > > 6. Annette: > > * Two key questions I would be asking if I were doing this: What > is > > the desired learning outcome for this 30-minute exercise? And will it fit > > into their current skillset? > > * Consider, what do you really want them to *feel or experience* > > during these sessions? What can you do in a short session? Could have > them > > do something that makes them think about research design in a more > creative > > and ethical way. The outcome might be 'to raise questions,' rather than > to > > 'build skill' or 'apply'. Suggested exercises: > > * To get people to consider how much their own perspective > > matters in what they will see as 'the field,' or what they will notice in > > whatever they see as the field, I use an exercise called "write the > room." > > The goal is to do three timed writing exercises with the verbal prompt, > > "write the room" and no further instruction. I disrupt their viewpoint in > > the second and third iteration in different ways so that they might > > understand the challenges of trying to understand culture in the first > > place. Hopefully, the exercise helps them appreciate the sensibilities > > underpinning a qualitative perspective. And helps them consider the power > > of observing, and the ethical responsibilities that could go along with > > this power. [I've written this up and am happy to share if it's > interesting > > to you] > > * To get people to think about ethics, I show or discuss a > > specific case and have them write a reflection essay in response to it, > > choosing one of the ethical guidelines from a reading like the AoIR > ethics > > guidelines or an ethics article by one of our many AoIR members who write > > about ethics > > * To get people to think about emic versus etic perspectives, I > > show a clip from Nightmare Before Christmas, when Jack the Pumpkin King > is > > trying to describe the concept and feeling of Christmas to Halloween > Town. > > And then, when he fails, he goes to his lab to dissect stuffed bears, > > analyze the chemical makeup of a Christmas ornament, and reads a book > > called "scientific method" to try to understand what makes Christmas so > > special (this only works with certain audiences, and in regions where > > Christmas is the big celebration) > > * To get people to translate traditional ethnographic > techniques > > to digital environments, I have them choose a typical technique X > > (interview, observe, participate, examine artifacts) and list what is > > desired from each of these activities, asking the question "why do we X > in > > the first place?" What does X yield?". Then, taking the case of a > specific > > app/platform, reverse engineer the "what is desired" into a set of > research > > actions/activities that would have a similar yield and would fit the > actual > > context of study. E.g., we do interviews to elicit. One thing we desire > > from interviews to hear information from people directly. Interviews give > > us an individual's perceptions, more than information of their actual > > behaviors. So interviews are good for learning how people feel or what > they > > perceive. How would we achieve these goals in wechat? Twitter? .... > > > > > > > > I can add other things to this last as they come. > > > > Thanks for your points, Annette. For context, this is an additional class > > in their methods course, and they have already done 18 lectures and > > seminars on methods. So I believe that they should already have a decent > > background in qualitative research methods. I know that ideally this > topic > > would be an entire semester, this should not be a cut and paste job, but > > this is the only time the department can give me it seems (and I have to > > submit my thesis in 3 weeks time). As far as I can tell, if I don't do > this > > session the students won't have a session, and time is short. > > > > During the session i aim to familiarise them with debates on digital > > ethics (your writing included), the importance of understanding the field > > (how censorship, mobility, surveillance, privacy and visibility work, > > boundedness and the territoriality of certain sites -> i'm a geographer), > > several principles to consider (based partly on Pink et al.), how the > > techniques they already have can be used in digitally centred research, > > introducing ideas of playfulness in the field (to understand the field) > and > > then exploring several potential field sites (Facebook, WhatsApp, > Twitter, > > Instagram, Weibo, WeChat, Skype). I hope that this session can be more > of a > > provocation, they should not be using it to create a research plan for > > their dissertations, that would not be possible in such a short time. It > > should provoke the students to consider what they will need to pay > > attention to and consider in any digitally centred or digitally active > > research project, and that 'going digital' is not simple, that one is not > > prepared for it just because one uses Facebook, and that digitally > centred > > or active research needs to take into account many additional points. > > > > After what you said, I'm extending the exercise to 45-60 minutes. It is > > part of a 2 hour session with time for feedback and Q&A in the last part > of > > the session. I also have office hours, if necessary there may be follow > up > > sessions with the students, but that is out of my hands. I'm going to > use > > some of these suggestions as suggested assignments and additional tasks, > > particularly ethical reflection, writing and analysis. I will share this > to > > their programme convener, and hopefully we can do more to prepare the > > students. > > > > Carwyn > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Annette Markham <amarkham@gmail.com> > > Sent: 17 March 2020 08:39 > > To: Jill Walker Rettberg <Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no>; Morris,CJ (pgr) > < > > C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk>; air-l@aoir.org <air-l@aoir.org> > > Subject: Re: [Air-L] Exercises for teaching digital ethnographic methods > > (remotely) > > > > I like the idea of focusing on current issues as Jill mentions, but in > > general, I think this would be difficult in a 30 minute exercise. Maybe > > that could be built into the main lecture more than the exercise.... In > any > > case, I think 30 minutes is too short for designing a study. And if I > > understand correctly, Carwyn, you're giving a single lecture on the > topic, > > right? So how would they get feedback on their research design? > > > > Two key questions I would be asking if I were doing this: What is the > > desired learning outcome for this 30-minute exercise? And will it fit > into > > their current skillset? > > > > Do you want them to understand the steps in designing a research project? > > (are they skilled at creating research design generally, so that they can > > translate this into whatever you're framing as 'digital?) Or do you want > > them to feel how tough it is to design a study in a short period of time? > > (cuz 30 minutes is super short). Or to review basic ethical principles? > Do > > you want them to practice some techniques? Or consider the size and scope > > of a possible study? These different goals require different setup. > > > > In this situation, you might ask yourself a different question: What do > > you really want them to *feel or experience* during this 30 minutes? If > you > > don't know your audience, maybe you could have them do something that > makes > > them think about research design in a more creative and ethical way. The > > outcome might be 'to raise questions,' rather than to 'build skill' or > > 'apply'. This is what I would do, but then again, I like exercises that > are > > more provocative than anything else. > > > > Anyway here are some exercises that take around 30 minutes that I do: > > > > To get people to consider how much their own perspective matters in what > > they will see as 'the field,' or what they will notice in whatever they > see > > as the field, I use an exercise called "write the room." The goal is to > do > > three timed writing exercises with the verbal prompt, "write the room" > and > > no further instruction. I disrupt their viewpoint in the second and third > > iteration in different ways so that they might understand the challenges > of > > trying to understand culture in the first place. Hopefully, the exercise > > helps them appreciate the sensibilities underpinning a qualitative > > perspective. And helps them consider the power of observing, and the > > ethical responsibilities that could go along with this power. [I've > written > > this up and am happy to share if it's interesting to you] > > > > To get people to think about ethics, I show or discuss a specific case > and > > have them write a reflection essay in response to it, choosing one of the > > ethical guidelines from a reading like the AoIR ethics guidelines or an > > ethics article by one of our many AoIR members who write about ethics > > > > To get people to think about emic versus etic perspectives, I show a clip > > from Nightmare Before Christmas, when Jack the Pumpkin King is trying to > > describe the concept and feeling of Christmas to Halloween Town. And > then, > > when he fails, he goes to his lab to dissect stuffed bears, analyze the > > chemical makeup of a Christmas ornament, and reads a book called > > "scientific method" to try to understand what makes Christmas so special > > (this only works with certain audiences, and in regions where Christmas > is > > the big celebration) > > > > To get people to translate traditional ethnographic techniques to digital > > environments, I have them choose a typical technique X (interview, > observe, > > participate, examine artifacts) and list what is desired from each of > these > > activities, asking the question "why do we X in the first place?" What > does > > X yield?". Then, taking the case of a specific app/platform, reverse > > engineer the "what is desired" into a set of research actions/activities > > that would have a similar yield and would fit the actual context of > study. > > E.g., we do interviews to elicit. One thing we desire from interviews to > > hear information from people directly. Interviews give us an individual's > > perceptions, more than information of their actual behaviors. So > interviews > > are good for learning how people feel or what they perceive. How would we > > achieve these goals in wechat? Twitter? .... > > > > I'm happy to talk more about these, > > > > Annette > > > > > > > > > > On 3/17/20, 08:22, "Air-L on behalf of Jill Walker Rettberg" < > > air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no > > > > wrote: > > > > What about asking them to design an ethical research methodology for > > researching how people are using technology during the pandemic, or > > something like that? I think they're more likely to be able to focus on > > coursework if it's directly relevant to the worries and anxieties of > their > > current digital life, and this might even help them feel slightly more in > > control of their situation. And maybe some of them will keep going and do > > really interesting research? > > > > Other resources: > > > > Deborah Lupton started a crowdsourced collection of resources for > > Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic: https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > > 1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZCl8/edit?fbclid= > > IwAR3mwwrXMlKTMkJxjPtQaDaHJcTtLGSC49oupIChpSWI2_bnwOtCLolZ04w > > > > The Selfie Research Network set up an online syllabus with lesson > > plans that would mostly work online from home. It was developed in 2014 > but > > I think you could still use some of this. > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. > > selfieresearchers.com%2fthe-selfie-course%2f&c=E,1, > > MxEpCjuuwvGdNXubv7TD58Szc3yN_hAt9i7dORTM-g6n46i7ooxIG71mSWBHzN029qcFGFr > > MQnxcpaqvTYbzWMdlNCAfmWCmxhB_6NrDuOm6rYE,&typo=1 > > > > Jill > > > > On 17/03/2020, 00:16, "Air-L on behalf of Morris,CJ (pgr)" < > > air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm now putting together lectures on digital > > qualitative/ethnographic/field methods for my departments undergraduate > and > > postgraduate students. This seems like one of the few ways they will be > > able to safely do some of their assignments. I'll be giving this lecture > > via Zoom, a digital classroom. > > > > The current lecture design is: Intro -> My research background > > (digital ethnography of WeChat/Weibo activism) -> Understanding the > digital > > field -> Ethics -> Q&A -> Doing ethnography in... (FB, WhatsApp, Weibo, > > Twitter, WeChat, Douyin/TikTok, Reddit, Insta, hashtags) -> being playful > > in the field -> exercise -> feedback -> final Q&A. > > > > I'm putting together a 30 minute exercise, but i was wondering if > > anyone had examples of successful digital, ethno/qualitative research > > methods exercises they've done. Particularly those that reflect on > ethics, > > research design and methods. > > > > I'm currently planning on going basic, asking them putting > > together the research plan of a digitally centred study. This is open to > > change, but if I continue with this, does anyone have any recommendations > > for topics that they could do the plan for? I'd rather assign topics to > the > > groups to help focus them in the short time period we have. > > > > Carwyn Morris > > PhD Candidate in Human Geography and Urban Studies > > Department of Geography and Environment > > London School of Economics > > Co-organiser LSE China Reading Group > > Tweeting @carwyn<https://twitter.com/carwyn> > > _______________________________________________ > > The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list > > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2faoir.org&c=E,1, > > KKCgMir86fJMQNADQgIxJGIHFB8IVm9MpDJ4sIIXbaqFQcPtWDQ_ > > vjyszwFId1Y0337V5ABu308zm7czaurVNfEaY7ILcd-_-u7kVT6dL2fzJLQ- > > xD03NI0,&typo=1 > > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flistserv.aoir.org% > > 2flistinfo.cgi%2fair-l-aoir.org&c=E,1,EerNPVETcP3g7Q0o7WkD_ > > hh4UdasOQSmLm6q3_2HgQMeigBEdufVRwJolmPSbC_bEBJ9f3KWjKLGuhaHPgcW1hkvv8WxG > > hW8pK5NZCcYmcc6lvgWjw,,&typo=1 > > > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. > > aoir.org%2f&c=E,1,emHgVYQaNZCPSP8XtroKceM7pMyq4z > > mcz0rGRBV58Sm6MmJG5AMyhGsbbliqrRjOVtuCQBrkAoSQoDA- > > jJFlIFxXA7-rC3RpNMQDoQwS&typo=1 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list > > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2faoir.org&c=E,1, > > l7cfpM7n7Js863RKTAnwqJf1VEy-iJTF1Zf9S4y_MV0_JTlB3WHPVIDIh_ > > kM56Dbtf4fsMWeGiD7f2vTWTSr94BEDACMrVu6ArQa_veZgxNiPDrtUXSfOQ,,&typo=1 > > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flistserv.aoir.org% > > 2flistinfo.cgi%2fair-l-aoir.org&c=E,1,3ErR8gS5nrCG359pSqSOYRcBrX5ck0 > > EyEdx6qvaUxeOYtFiGS1rFYVKNFw_m3fkWxX60L_yGo7T0YHdUgiwFnpLRXKxPdovNijv1 > > Or5lOasc5abRiz-diVKP3gWN&typo=1 > > > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. > > aoir.org%2f&c=E,1,qGI8s7bl9773yoPo3h9OL5O-hzHgnKmCrJcDFCt73uyrubGjfimWaq > > YDv2cpf6LerDVsOMgsXNY-qgKLavE3VfUsltippKodOwBFJRQkF9 > > 1EKWYYD6N4K-0oIyc,&typo=1 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list > > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2faoir.org&c=E,1, > > Lx1h5HOnf9JFOjIR9OkqmZ06bjua3oHT8xXPSVFQ9hWNvVN4Uw-lwioUt13fSynlovOci_ > > 7rr8jdy71aVDCZQygoYktiJuQjF0zEwmkBAThKrA,,&typo=1 > > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: https://linkprotect.cudasvc > . > > com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flistserv.aoir.org%2flistinfo.cgi%2fair-l-aoir. > > org&c=E,1,JlChhUJHST75LP_2jAEJiQoyk3CTX70LQmXFvlXjKmtdj > > TtqtBc6yG9qBPcXW7vaLc54rANJsBvSKkeUuk6KTeheopTgGducNMJ5Ip8nX > > ng1rSVcyFPN3E6ivQ,,&typo=1 > > > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aoir.org%2f&c=E,1 > , > > OCWD3KjSVWo1pOm3n_Deeec7Ao37Q06EIi1mfPSO4fXPflpL > > w7pnwJgPjUm59K2KDFRuFoxFi1Hno81a-MIUT_qS9xwyWUNPocS8dG6MNL6xjY5L_ > > o69cGK0eyP3&typo=1 > > _______________________________________________ > > The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list > > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org > > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/ > > listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org > > > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > > http://www.aoir.org/ > _______________________________________________ > The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: > http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > http://www.aoir.org/ _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Hello everyone, What a great series of ideas and recommendations! Thanks to everyone! One thing I might suggest (in line with some other comments) is that less is often more. With all these ideas it might be easy to overload the session. Think about the one thing you'd like them all to come away with (feel free to pick my brain personally !) Lovely to see good things coming out of this crazy time Best Jamie On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, 11:44 Glatt,ZA (pgr), <Z.A.Glatt@lse.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi Carwyn and everyone,
I know you already have access to this as one of our core IRL members Carwyn, but I thought it was worth sending out an updated version of the LSE Digital Ethnography Collective reading list, which has some awesome new readings on it: https://tinyurl.com/rpc92zy This should be of use to anyone currently teaching or planning to teach digital ethnography:
If anyone on this list feels so inclined, it would be greatly appreciated if you could share our tweet about this to help researchers starting out with digital ethnography: https://twitter.com/DigEthnogLSE/status/1240233935617101827
I also thought it would be worth sharing the livestream and slides for our recent session with Sarah Quinton on 'Ethics in digital ethnographic research'. The slides are full of good advice, as well as useful references at the end.
Livestream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyRvZgCzhSk&t Slides: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cigCab-yBxgyjvh35Jx4WXqO4c6-NnY4/view?usp=s...
I hope you're all well and staying safe in these unsettling times <3
All the best, Zoe
________________________ Zoë Glatt www.zoeglatt.com <http://www.zoeglatt.com/> ESRC PhD Researcher in Media & Communications London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) Managing Editor: Communication, Culture & Critique Co-Founder: LSE Digital Ethnography Collective @DigEthnogLSE < https://twitter.com/DigEthnogLSE> Graduate Student Rep: Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) Associate Lecturer in Media & Communications (2019/20): Goldsmiths University YouTube channel <https://www.youtube.com/user/Zedstergal> | Twitter < https://twitter.com/ZoeGlatt> | LSE bio < http://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communications/people/phd-researchers/zoe-gla...
On 18/03/2020, 10:33, "Air-L on behalf of Radhika G" < air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of gradhika2012@gmail.com> wrote:
I've hesitated to chime in here - because - well where do I start?:)
Been teaching online for a while now and have used several kinds of assignments to get students (undergrad and grad) to think through digital living and digital immersion.
Others here (Annette, Jill - the usual "suspects" doing this work really well already:)) have already given great suggestions.
If you need to brainstorm I can email off list too.
r
" The current lecture design is: Intro -> My research background (digital ethnography of WeChat/Weibo activism) -> Understanding the digital field -> Ethics -> Q&A -> Doing ethnography in... (FB, WhatsApp, Weibo, Twitter, WeChat, Douyin/TikTok, Reddit, Insta, hashtags) -> being playful in the field -> exercise -> feedback -> final Q&A.
I'm putting together a 30 minute exercise, but i was wondering if anyone had examples of successful digital, ethno/qualitative research methods exercises they've done. Particularly those that reflect on ethics, research design and methods. "___ Radhika Gajjala Managing Editor: Fembot Collective Co-editor of Ada: Journal of Gender and New Media (adanewmedia.org)
Professor, School of Media and Communication and American Culture Studies Program
Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green Ohio http://www.radhikagajjala.org
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 6:42 PM brook bolander < brookbolander@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for sharing these ideas! > Annette- i‘d love to hear more. I’m just moving my whole digital discourse > class online and am rethinking assessments, structures and ideas. > All best, > Brook > > > On Tuesday, March 17, 2020, Andrew Herman <aherman@wlu.ca> wrote: > > > This is fantastic! Thanks so much. > > ________________________________ > > From: Air-L <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org> on behalf of Morris,CJ > > (pgr) <C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 8:37 AM > > To: Annette Markham <amarkham@gmail.com>; Jill Walker Rettberg < > > Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no>; air-l@aoir.org <air-l@aoir.org> > > Subject: Re: [Air-L] Exercises for teaching digital ethnographic methods > > (remotely) > > > > Dear all, > > > > First the ideas shared so far, and then a reply to Annette 😊 > > > > Recommendations have included: > > > > 1. Jodi: trace ethnography https://linkprotect.cudasvc. > > com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fstuartgeiger.com%2fpapers% > > 2ftrace-ethnography-hicss-geiger-ribes.pdf&c=E,1,Skn-lOq-_ > > 49tNQUAdQKxL6LRsUkv9y1mnyhTc8LNlXWipfgiYsjtlAPpJc0l8U-0Eiq_ > > 6rUOzhoe75c3HynBug1YLvHNC9FKg_r8lC1VN6LA8UW3dNuNuryslw,,&typo=1 > > 2. From Crystal: > > * The exercises invite students to draw on their choice/knowledge > > of internet pop culture, which can be lighthearted and meta during this > > time. > > * On paralanguage short films: https://linkprotect.cudasvc. > > com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwishcrys.com %2fparalanguage-short-film%2f&c=E,1, > > > sfxg2KTsIaAYo_mMHH7OqjYTzznJsUA3UkN0ABqZVExwgZkFTrX0pVSXdOS5FV6VaIxww4C4sz > > -TiyWfYAFhZUF4Acuztnxx65MmuchAQ14ieXuHo39v&typo=1 > > * On internet paralanguages: https://linkprotect.cudasvc. > > com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwishcrys.com %2finternet-paralanguages%2f&c=E,1, > > 9HkXSvHIz7fLcJ7sGMouknwxATgr-UwxgiIVoWKk-OxyvJjnYiybdy6P0NbKVYNVk6NWbow > > ZcNQPXnwzWCMRdSwZhPhzjc2Cn9ZfMQ0g2eiffDitO_5CY9ga&typo=1 > > * On internet celebrity: https://linkprotect.cudasvc. > > com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwishcrys.com %2finternet-celebrity%2f&c=E,1,- > > K1LwMxQlnwNHY74Y-FVNIux2TMq6R0s_xrex053zcuGqzy1NSxzPF74aHWHg_ > > rMtvWzguW5T_282grdYtczw493K1C_GFhkc8Uh5TW_rFC49l_-hQ,,&typo=1 > > * This old but gold selfie syllabus put together by several AoIR > > members in The Selfies Research Network is a great resource: > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. > > selfieresearchers.com %2fthe-selfie-course%2fselfie-syllabus%2f&c=E,1, > > P1mDMxiOIZSo_iN4fUcFmjw-Sp8JiriD0N0BUZUBl46_3sletPzTEjBPfxb8a1_ > > mvaPWJioaf4lLEWi04uiF0G5hNOEoR4ZPirOau0tbEA,,&typo=1 > > 3. Evelina: presented fictive research cases for the students to > > discuss if the students taught the cases where ethical and how the > students > > would go about to gather material in the most ethical way. Following the > > aoir research ethics guidelines. For reflection and not examination. > > 4. Jill: design an ethical research methodology for researching how > > people are using technology during the pandemic. Also, the Selfie > > Researchers and Deborah Lupton started a crowdsourced collection of > > resources for Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic: https://docs.google.com/ > > document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZCl8/edit?fbclid= > > IwAR3mwwrXMlKTMkJxjPtQaDaHJcTtLGSC49oupIChpSWI2_bnwOtCLolZ04w > > 5. Kristian: building on Jill's comment, online communities popping up > > everywhere focusing on corona and life in quarantine, everything from how > > to help each other to sharing memes. So your students could design a > > project for researching one of these ad hoc communities. > > 6. Annette: > > * Two key questions I would be asking if I were doing this: What > is > > the desired learning outcome for this 30-minute exercise? And will it fit > > into their current skillset? > > * Consider, what do you really want them to *feel or experience* > > during these sessions? What can you do in a short session? Could have > them > > do something that makes them think about research design in a more > creative > > and ethical way. The outcome might be 'to raise questions,' rather than > to > > 'build skill' or 'apply'. Suggested exercises: > > * To get people to consider how much their own perspective > > matters in what they will see as 'the field,' or what they will notice in > > whatever they see as the field, I use an exercise called "write the > room." > > The goal is to do three timed writing exercises with the verbal prompt, > > "write the room" and no further instruction. I disrupt their viewpoint in > > the second and third iteration in different ways so that they might > > understand the challenges of trying to understand culture in the first > > place. Hopefully, the exercise helps them appreciate the sensibilities > > underpinning a qualitative perspective. And helps them consider the power > > of observing, and the ethical responsibilities that could go along with > > this power. [I've written this up and am happy to share if it's > interesting > > to you] > > * To get people to think about ethics, I show or discuss a > > specific case and have them write a reflection essay in response to it, > > choosing one of the ethical guidelines from a reading like the AoIR > ethics > > guidelines or an ethics article by one of our many AoIR members who write > > about ethics > > * To get people to think about emic versus etic perspectives, I > > show a clip from Nightmare Before Christmas, when Jack the Pumpkin King > is > > trying to describe the concept and feeling of Christmas to Halloween > Town. > > And then, when he fails, he goes to his lab to dissect stuffed bears, > > analyze the chemical makeup of a Christmas ornament, and reads a book > > called "scientific method" to try to understand what makes Christmas so > > special (this only works with certain audiences, and in regions where > > Christmas is the big celebration) > > * To get people to translate traditional ethnographic > techniques > > to digital environments, I have them choose a typical technique X > > (interview, observe, participate, examine artifacts) and list what is > > desired from each of these activities, asking the question "why do we X > in > > the first place?" What does X yield?". Then, taking the case of a > specific > > app/platform, reverse engineer the "what is desired" into a set of > research > > actions/activities that would have a similar yield and would fit the > actual > > context of study. E.g., we do interviews to elicit. One thing we desire > > from interviews to hear information from people directly. Interviews give > > us an individual's perceptions, more than information of their actual > > behaviors. So interviews are good for learning how people feel or what > they > > perceive. How would we achieve these goals in wechat? Twitter? .... > > > > > > > > I can add other things to this last as they come. > > > > Thanks for your points, Annette. For context, this is an additional class > > in their methods course, and they have already done 18 lectures and > > seminars on methods. So I believe that they should already have a decent > > background in qualitative research methods. I know that ideally this > topic > > would be an entire semester, this should not be a cut and paste job, but > > this is the only time the department can give me it seems (and I have to > > submit my thesis in 3 weeks time). As far as I can tell, if I don't do > this > > session the students won't have a session, and time is short. > > > > During the session i aim to familiarise them with debates on digital > > ethics (your writing included), the importance of understanding the field > > (how censorship, mobility, surveillance, privacy and visibility work, > > boundedness and the territoriality of certain sites -> i'm a geographer), > > several principles to consider (based partly on Pink et al.), how the > > techniques they already have can be used in digitally centred research, > > introducing ideas of playfulness in the field (to understand the field) > and > > then exploring several potential field sites (Facebook, WhatsApp, > Twitter, > > Instagram, Weibo, WeChat, Skype). I hope that this session can be more > of a > > provocation, they should not be using it to create a research plan for > > their dissertations, that would not be possible in such a short time. It > > should provoke the students to consider what they will need to pay > > attention to and consider in any digitally centred or digitally active > > research project, and that 'going digital' is not simple, that one is not > > prepared for it just because one uses Facebook, and that digitally > centred > > or active research needs to take into account many additional points. > > > > After what you said, I'm extending the exercise to 45-60 minutes. It is > > part of a 2 hour session with time for feedback and Q&A in the last part > of > > the session. I also have office hours, if necessary there may be follow > up > > sessions with the students, but that is out of my hands. I'm going to > use > > some of these suggestions as suggested assignments and additional tasks, > > particularly ethical reflection, writing and analysis. I will share this > to > > their programme convener, and hopefully we can do more to prepare the > > students. > > > > Carwyn > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Annette Markham <amarkham@gmail.com> > > Sent: 17 March 2020 08:39 > > To: Jill Walker Rettberg <Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no>; Morris,CJ (pgr) > < > > C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk>; air-l@aoir.org <air-l@aoir.org> > > Subject: Re: [Air-L] Exercises for teaching digital ethnographic methods > > (remotely) > > > > I like the idea of focusing on current issues as Jill mentions, but in > > general, I think this would be difficult in a 30 minute exercise. Maybe > > that could be built into the main lecture more than the exercise.... In > any > > case, I think 30 minutes is too short for designing a study. And if I > > understand correctly, Carwyn, you're giving a single lecture on the > topic, > > right? So how would they get feedback on their research design? > > > > Two key questions I would be asking if I were doing this: What is the > > desired learning outcome for this 30-minute exercise? And will it fit > into > > their current skillset? > > > > Do you want them to understand the steps in designing a research project? > > (are they skilled at creating research design generally, so that they can > > translate this into whatever you're framing as 'digital?) Or do you want > > them to feel how tough it is to design a study in a short period of time? > > (cuz 30 minutes is super short). Or to review basic ethical principles? > Do > > you want them to practice some techniques? Or consider the size and scope > > of a possible study? These different goals require different setup. > > > > In this situation, you might ask yourself a different question: What do > > you really want them to *feel or experience* during this 30 minutes? If > you > > don't know your audience, maybe you could have them do something that > makes > > them think about research design in a more creative and ethical way. The > > outcome might be 'to raise questions,' rather than to 'build skill' or > > 'apply'. This is what I would do, but then again, I like exercises that > are > > more provocative than anything else. > > > > Anyway here are some exercises that take around 30 minutes that I do: > > > > To get people to consider how much their own perspective matters in what > > they will see as 'the field,' or what they will notice in whatever they > see > > as the field, I use an exercise called "write the room." The goal is to > do > > three timed writing exercises with the verbal prompt, "write the room" > and > > no further instruction. I disrupt their viewpoint in the second and third > > iteration in different ways so that they might understand the challenges > of > > trying to understand culture in the first place. Hopefully, the exercise > > helps them appreciate the sensibilities underpinning a qualitative > > perspective. And helps them consider the power of observing, and the > > ethical responsibilities that could go along with this power. [I've > written > > this up and am happy to share if it's interesting to you] > > > > To get people to think about ethics, I show or discuss a specific case > and > > have them write a reflection essay in response to it, choosing one of the > > ethical guidelines from a reading like the AoIR ethics guidelines or an > > ethics article by one of our many AoIR members who write about ethics > > > > To get people to think about emic versus etic perspectives, I show a clip > > from Nightmare Before Christmas, when Jack the Pumpkin King is trying to > > describe the concept and feeling of Christmas to Halloween Town. And > then, > > when he fails, he goes to his lab to dissect stuffed bears, analyze the > > chemical makeup of a Christmas ornament, and reads a book called > > "scientific method" to try to understand what makes Christmas so special > > (this only works with certain audiences, and in regions where Christmas > is > > the big celebration) > > > > To get people to translate traditional ethnographic techniques to digital > > environments, I have them choose a typical technique X (interview, > observe, > > participate, examine artifacts) and list what is desired from each of > these > > activities, asking the question "why do we X in the first place?" What > does > > X yield?". Then, taking the case of a specific app/platform, reverse > > engineer the "what is desired" into a set of research actions/activities > > that would have a similar yield and would fit the actual context of > study. > > E.g., we do interviews to elicit. One thing we desire from interviews to > > hear information from people directly. Interviews give us an individual's > > perceptions, more than information of their actual behaviors. So > interviews > > are good for learning how people feel or what they perceive. How would we > > achieve these goals in wechat? Twitter? .... > > > > I'm happy to talk more about these, > > > > Annette > > > > > > > > > > On 3/17/20, 08:22, "Air-L on behalf of Jill Walker Rettberg" < > > air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no > > > > wrote: > > > > What about asking them to design an ethical research methodology for > > researching how people are using technology during the pandemic, or > > something like that? I think they're more likely to be able to focus on > > coursework if it's directly relevant to the worries and anxieties of > their > > current digital life, and this might even help them feel slightly more in > > control of their situation. And maybe some of them will keep going and do > > really interesting research? > > > > Other resources: > > > > Deborah Lupton started a crowdsourced collection of resources for > > Doing Fieldwork in a Pandemic: https://docs.google.com/document/d/ > > 1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZCl8/edit?fbclid= > > IwAR3mwwrXMlKTMkJxjPtQaDaHJcTtLGSC49oupIChpSWI2_bnwOtCLolZ04w > > > > The Selfie Research Network set up an online syllabus with lesson > > plans that would mostly work online from home. It was developed in 2014 > but > > I think you could still use some of this. > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. > > selfieresearchers.com%2fthe-selfie-course%2f&c=E,1, > > MxEpCjuuwvGdNXubv7TD58Szc3yN_hAt9i7dORTM-g6n46i7ooxIG71mSWBHzN029qcFGFr > > MQnxcpaqvTYbzWMdlNCAfmWCmxhB_6NrDuOm6rYE,&typo=1 > > > > Jill > > > > On 17/03/2020, 00:16, "Air-L on behalf of Morris,CJ (pgr)" < > > air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of C.J.Morris@lse.ac.uk> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm now putting together lectures on digital > > qualitative/ethnographic/field methods for my departments undergraduate > and > > postgraduate students. This seems like one of the few ways they will be > > able to safely do some of their assignments. I'll be giving this lecture > > via Zoom, a digital classroom. > > > > The current lecture design is: Intro -> My research background > > (digital ethnography of WeChat/Weibo activism) -> Understanding the > digital > > field -> Ethics -> Q&A -> Doing ethnography in... (FB, WhatsApp, Weibo, > > Twitter, WeChat, Douyin/TikTok, Reddit, Insta, hashtags) -> being playful > > in the field -> exercise -> feedback -> final Q&A. > > > > I'm putting together a 30 minute exercise, but i was wondering if > > anyone had examples of successful digital, ethno/qualitative research > > methods exercises they've done. Particularly those that reflect on > ethics, > > research design and methods. > > > > I'm currently planning on going basic, asking them putting > > together the research plan of a digitally centred study. This is open to > > change, but if I continue with this, does anyone have any recommendations > > for topics that they could do the plan for? I'd rather assign topics to > the > > groups to help focus them in the short time period we have. > > > > Carwyn Morris > > PhD Candidate in Human Geography and Urban Studies > > Department of Geography and Environment > > London School of Economics > > Co-organiser LSE China Reading Group > > Tweeting @carwyn<https://twitter.com/carwyn> > > _______________________________________________ > > The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list > > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2faoir.org&c=E,1, > > KKCgMir86fJMQNADQgIxJGIHFB8IVm9MpDJ4sIIXbaqFQcPtWDQ_ > > vjyszwFId1Y0337V5ABu308zm7czaurVNfEaY7ILcd-_-u7kVT6dL2fzJLQ- > > xD03NI0,&typo=1 > > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flistserv.aoir.org% > > 2flistinfo.cgi%2fair-l-aoir.org&c=E,1,EerNPVETcP3g7Q0o7WkD_ > > hh4UdasOQSmLm6q3_2HgQMeigBEdufVRwJolmPSbC_bEBJ9f3KWjKLGuhaHPgcW1hkvv8WxG > > hW8pK5NZCcYmcc6lvgWjw,,&typo=1 > > > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. > > aoir.org%2f&c=E,1,emHgVYQaNZCPSP8XtroKceM7pMyq4z > > mcz0rGRBV58Sm6MmJG5AMyhGsbbliqrRjOVtuCQBrkAoSQoDA- > > jJFlIFxXA7-rC3RpNMQDoQwS&typo=1 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list > > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2faoir.org&c=E,1, > > l7cfpM7n7Js863RKTAnwqJf1VEy-iJTF1Zf9S4y_MV0_JTlB3WHPVIDIh_ > > kM56Dbtf4fsMWeGiD7f2vTWTSr94BEDACMrVu6ArQa_veZgxNiPDrtUXSfOQ,,&typo=1 > > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flistserv.aoir.org% > > 2flistinfo.cgi%2fair-l-aoir.org &c=E,1,3ErR8gS5nrCG359pSqSOYRcBrX5ck0 > > EyEdx6qvaUxeOYtFiGS1rFYVKNFw_m3fkWxX60L_yGo7T0YHdUgiwFnpLRXKxPdovNijv1 > > Or5lOasc5abRiz-diVKP3gWN&typo=1 > > > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww. > > aoir.org %2f&c=E,1,qGI8s7bl9773yoPo3h9OL5O-hzHgnKmCrJcDFCt73uyrubGjfimWaq > > YDv2cpf6LerDVsOMgsXNY-qgKLavE3VfUsltippKodOwBFJRQkF9 > > 1EKWYYD6N4K-0oIyc,&typo=1 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list > > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2faoir.org&c=E,1, > > Lx1h5HOnf9JFOjIR9OkqmZ06bjua3oHT8xXPSVFQ9hWNvVN4Uw-lwioUt13fSynlovOci_ > > 7rr8jdy71aVDCZQygoYktiJuQjF0zEwmkBAThKrA,,&typo=1 > > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: https://linkprotect.cudasvc > . > > com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flistserv.aoir.org %2flistinfo.cgi%2fair-l-aoir. > > org&c=E,1,JlChhUJHST75LP_2jAEJiQoyk3CTX70LQmXFvlXjKmtdj > > TtqtBc6yG9qBPcXW7vaLc54rANJsBvSKkeUuk6KTeheopTgGducNMJ5Ip8nX > > ng1rSVcyFPN3E6ivQ,,&typo=1 > > > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aoir.org%2f&c=E,1 > , > > OCWD3KjSVWo1pOm3n_Deeec7Ao37Q06EIi1mfPSO4fXPflpL > > w7pnwJgPjUm59K2KDFRuFoxFi1Hno81a-MIUT_qS9xwyWUNPocS8dG6MNL6xjY5L_ > > o69cGK0eyP3&typo=1 > > _______________________________________________ > > The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list > > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org > > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/ > > listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org > > > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > > http://www.aoir.org/ > _______________________________________________ > The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: > http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > http://www.aoir.org/ _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
participants (9)
-
Andrew Herman -
Annette Markham -
brook bolander -
Glatt,ZA (pgr) -
Jamie Coates -
Jill Walker Rettberg -
Kristian A Bjørkelo -
Morris,CJ (pgr) -
Radhika G