Andrea, There seems to be general agreement that if the group's site and\or chatroom is clearly identified as a public site, these are roughly analogous to a public space in which observation without informed consent is allowable. On the same analogy, however, _recording_ and\or publishing information made available in that public space - e.g., crafting a log of notes, including verbatim quotes from a website or chatroom, reproducing the webpage in a book for publication, etc. - is _not_ allowable without either informed consent and-or anonymization of the original text and author(s). Some persons and-or national traditions are more strict than others. The US tends to be more lenient, especially if any risk to the subjects of research is minimal (and all possible steps are taken to minimize that risk) while the benefit of such research is great. On the other hand, the NESH guidelines - as noted in the aoir ethics working committee report - are more insistent on protecting the rights of the authors-subjects of material found on the web, even at the cost of limiting or making certain kinds of research impossible. You might also have a look at the University of Bristol form for proposed research projects - i don't have the URL right with me, but you should be able to find it fairly easily. (If not, please e-mail me and I'll get it to you next week when I'm back in my office.) Another - though, of course, somewhat contested - consideration: what rights and-or other protections would _you_ want accorded to you, if you were the subject(s) of research, and someone else were the researcher? G'luck! Charles Ess Chair, aoir ethics working committee -----Original Message----- From: bakera@ohiou.edu To: air-l@aoir.org Sent: 06.06.02 13:32 Subject: [Air-l] ethics question in researching the internet In regard to the case of an online hate group discussed, I have a general question: When is an online group "public"? Would a group with no special registration requirement qualify? Would a group where any identifyer can serve as a userid fit, or one that doesn't check email addresses? In any or all of the cases which might be "public", is it okay to research them without (a) announcing the intent, and (b) without seeking permission of all of the members? Are archives of public communities exempt from consent, a question already raised? I have read the latest draft of the AOIR guidelines and still seek input from members on these questions. Thanks. --Andrea Baker Ohio University _______________________________________________ Air-l mailing list Air-l@aoir.org http://www.aoir.org/mailman/listinfo/air-l