Journal or conference articles on web 2.0
Dear All, WEB 2.0 seems to be very much in vogue at the moment, I'm researching web 2.0 for a short essay and was wondering if any members of the list have read / plublished work on any aspect of web 2.0. Thanks in advance. -- Martin Garthwaite +447957 764819 Skype id mgarthwaite1330 MS IM marting@gmail.com
Martin, see: Kolbitsch, J., & Maurer, H. (2006). The Transformation of the Web: How Emerging Communities Shape the Information we Consume. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 12(2), 187-213. Habib, M.C. (2006). Toward Academic Library 2.0: Development and application of a library 2.0 methodology. School of Information and Library Science. Retrouvé de http://hdl.handle.net/1901/356. Notess, G. (2006). The Terrible Twos: Web 2.0, Library 2.0, and More. Online , 30(3), 40. Retrouvé Décembre 29, 2006, de http://www.infotoday.com/online/may06/OnTheNet.shtml. O'Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. O'Reilly Media, Inc. http://www. oreillynet. com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20. html, Internet, 1, 2006. Roman Hoëgg, Miriam Meckel, Katarina Stanoevska-Slabeva, & Robert Martignoni. (2006). Overview of business models for Web 2.0 communities. GeNeMe 2006, pp 23-27. Retrouvé de http://www.alexandria.unisg.ch/EXPORT/DL/31412.pdf Serious_Business_Web2.0_EIU_White_Paper_cpoA9.pdf. FastSearch Web 2.0: Building the New Library', . (2005). Ariadne(45). Retrouvé Décembre 27, 2006, de http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue45/miller/. The quality of each vary regarding your needs. Anyway, Kolbitsch is a must in my opinion, because it offers general statement, recent and reliable, really uself to support references to Web 2.0 without having to reinvent the well in each sentence. For more specific content, lots of work is still to be done...but I am sure you know that ;-) Kind Regards 2007/4/19, Martin Garthwaite <marting@gmail.com>:
Dear All,
WEB 2.0 seems to be very much in vogue at the moment, I'm researching web 2.0 for a short essay and was wondering if any members of the list have read / plublished work on any aspect of web 2.0.
Thanks in advance.
-- Martin Garthwaite
+447957 764819 Skype id mgarthwaite1330 MS IM marting@gmail.com _______________________________________________ The air-l@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- Jeremy Depauw The Power of Knoweldge Sharing and Skills Synegism Journal de recherche: http://dev.ulb.ac.be/~jdepauw/dotclear/index.php
Seems like you would need to be more specific. danah boyd has done tons of work with social networking sites and tagging; Fernanda Viégas and Martin Wattenberg have published several excellent Wikipedia papers, Henry Jenkins has been writing books about participatory culture for a decade, etc. Kurt -- Kurt Luther Ph.D. Student, College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia, USA Martin Garthwaite wrote:
Dear All,
WEB 2.0 seems to be very much in vogue at the moment, I'm researching web 2.0 for a short essay and was wondering if any members of the list have read / plublished work on any aspect of web 2.0.
Thanks in advance.
Just to throw one out that I'm interested in, how about social organization? You don't have to list all that you have, just a key one that would have a good ref section. On 4/19/07, Kurt Luther <luther@cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
Seems like you would need to be more specific. danah boyd has done tons of work with social networking sites and tagging; Fernanda Viégas and Martin Wattenberg have published several excellent Wikipedia papers, Henry Jenkins has been writing books about participatory culture for a decade, etc.
Kurt
-- Kurt Luther Ph.D. Student, College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Martin Garthwaite wrote:
Dear All,
WEB 2.0 seems to be very much in vogue at the moment, I'm researching web 2.0 for a short essay and was wondering if any members of the list have read / plublished work on any aspect of web 2.0.
Thanks in advance.
_______________________________________________ The air-l@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
I intended to be specifically vague (-: I'm writing a paper on What web 2.0 is and why do we care? Hope that helps? Martin. On 4/19/07, Ellie Wix <elliewix@gmail.com> wrote:
Just to throw one out that I'm interested in, how about social organization? You don't have to list all that you have, just a key one that would have a good ref section.
On 4/19/07, Kurt Luther <luther@cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
Seems like you would need to be more specific. danah boyd has done tons of work with social networking sites and tagging; Fernanda Viégas and Martin Wattenberg have published several excellent Wikipedia papers, Henry Jenkins has been writing books about participatory culture for a decade, etc.
Kurt
-- Kurt Luther Ph.D. Student, College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Martin Garthwaite wrote:
Dear All,
WEB 2.0 seems to be very much in vogue at the moment, I'm researching web 2.0 for a short essay and was wondering if any members of the list
have
read
/ plublished work on any aspect of web 2.0.
Thanks in advance.
_______________________________________________ The air-l@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The air-l@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- Martin Garthwaite PhD candidate, London Knowledge Lab www.lkl.ac.uk +447957 764819 Skype id mgarthwaite1330 MS IM marting@gmail.com
At 15:30 Uhr +0100 19.4.2007, Martin Garthwaite wrote:
I'm writing a paper on What web 2.0 is and why do we care?
Do we? I'd rather see you come up with new points (not covered by earlier discussions in this list) as to why the term "Web 2.0" should be used despite its unclear definition and historically incorrect suggestion that the Web's development is revolutionary rather than evolutionary. Imho "2.0" is merely a rhetorical trick. Not useful, rather harmful. Consider "Music 2.0", "USA 2.0", "aoir 2.0", "Garthwaite 2.0"... Regards --u -- PD Dr. Ulf-Dietrich Reips *new address* Universität Zürich Psychologisches Institut Binzmühlestr. 14/13 8050 Zürich, Switzerland iScience portal (http://psych-iscience.unizh.ch/)
participants (5)
-
Ellie Wix -
Jeremy Depauw -
Kurt Luther -
Martin Garthwaite -
Ulf-Dietrich Reips