Re: [Air-l] Ethnography vs. Ethnomethodology
Hi! Ethnography primarily concerns itself with the prolonged study of a group of people. This generally involves immersion and participation in their day to day lives in an attempt to discover who they think they are, what they think they are doing and to what end they think they are doing it. Ethnography may involve many methodologies to accomplish this. Ethnomethodology, on the other hand, studies activities of group members to discover how they make sense of their surroundings. It specifically studies how individuals give sense to and accomplish their daily activities. It is not so much concerned with what they are doing but rather how they make sense of it. Cheers Sally On 31/03/2005, at 4:20 PM, Steffen Büffel wrote:
Hi all!
Thanks for the very helpful replies I got to my original posting(s). BTW: Sorry again for the multiple postings. Turned out that our server got bambarded with spam the last couple of days. Instead of 200 000 - 300 000 mails per day it had to process over 800 000 emails (!!!) which slowed it down quite a bit and gave users the impression that email were lost in the virtual nowhere.
Anyway, the replies I got raised another question for me, namely: What is the difference between ethnography and ethnomethodology? Of course I will go and check in the recommended readings myself but I thought that maybe this is an interessting issue for the list as well.
Cheers. Steffen -------------------------------------- wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter University of Trier - Media Studies phone +49 651 201 2273 fax +49 651 201 3741 mobile +49 176 2120 4435 icq 115761393 http://medien.uni-trier.de/132.0.html
_______________________________________________ The Air-l-aoir.org@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
On Mar 31, 2005, at 10:18 AM, cordelia@iinet.net.au wrote:
Hi!
Ethnography primarily concerns itself with the prolonged study of a group of people. This generally involves immersion and participation in their day to day lives in an attempt to discover who they think they are, what they think they are doing and to what end they think they are doing it. Ethnography may involve many methodologies to accomplish this. Ethnomethodology, on the other hand, studies activities of group members to discover how they make sense of their surroundings. It specifically studies how individuals give sense to and accomplish their daily activities. It is not so much concerned with what they are doing but rather how they make sense of it.
Cheers Sally
EMists definitely describe their subject as the "sense-making practices" of members. But they don't draw a sharp distinction between sense making practices and daily activities;indeed, they usually argue that they are one and the same thing. E.g., Garfinkel talks a lot about how sense making is embodied by or "incarnate" in members' practices. This goes along with EMists rejection of (talk of) psychological phenomena and processes, though some early EMists seemed to have had a more psychological angle on sense making. (In particular, Weider took a phenomenological approach to sense making, but he's taken shots for that from other EMists.) In line with all this, at least some CAists view their studies of conversational practices as studies of moment-by-moment member sense making. Cheers, Christian Christian Nelson, Ph.D. Scholar in Residence Dept. of Marketing and Health Communication 120 Boylston St. Emerson College Boston, MA 02116-4624
participants (2)
-
Christian Nelson -
cordelia@iinet.net.au