Dear AoIR, Are there studies of Twitter use analysing proportion of people mostly tweeting about public issues vs private/interpersonal ones? Something analogous to the studies of blogging that divided personal vs hobby vs political blogging like Lenhart, A. and S. Fox (2006) "Bloggers: A Portrait of the Internet’s New Storytellers" Pew Internet & American Life Project http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/Bloggers.aspx (although with Twitter as with blogging there would of course be problems with people who tweet in a varied way). Even better, studies of the kinds of people who do each kind of tweeting? And which differentiate tweeters from retweeters? I would like to quantify the (obvious) point that the number of active Tweeters on matters of journalistic interest adding comment or new information is vanishingly small and stratified compared to those who simply retweet or tweet on personal matters or just use Twitter to follow friends and celebrities. Did you know that 5% of Twitter users produced 75% of all activity, 21% had never tweeted themselves and 85% post less than once a day? Sysomos (2009) "Inside Twitter: An in-Depth Look inside the Twitter World " http://www.sysomos.com/insidetwitter/ PS Don't forget to check out (or contribute to) the Arab Spring literature collection I put together with some friends here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DU8AOlkTV6F0ZyoGcbk_060iBZG5tWKwj_n97EJP... And here: https://www.zotero.org/groups/arabspringmedia/items PPS Will be making strenuous efforts to get to the conference so I look forward to seeing my tribe again! -- David Brake (@drbrake http://davidbrake.org/) Senior Lecturer, Journalism & Communications, University of Bedfordshire http://www.beds.ac.uk/departments/jc +44 (0) 1582 743028
Hi David, Mor Naaman's 2010 paper used random samples to identify ~80% of twitter users as "meformers": primarily interested in personal matters, status updates. (and 20% informers, tweeting news, etc) http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~mor/publications/NaamanCSCW2010.pdf My own paper on teachers' professional uses of twitter (non-random sample) suggests they use it primarily to share resources and inform colleagues and very infrequently tweet personal messages/status updates. http://www.andreaforte.net/ForteICWSM.pdf Also, danah b. had a paper on retweeting practices: http://www.danah.org/papers/TweetTweetRetweet.pdf I'm not sure it's an obvious point that people are "increasingly" using twitter for personal message passing vs substantive discussion (the naaman study already identified a high proportion of such messages in their 2009 dataset)... Hope this helps! Andrea On 8/3/12 11:59 AM, David Brake wrote:
Dear AoIR,
Are there studies of Twitter use analysing proportion of people mostly tweeting about public issues vs private/interpersonal ones? Something analogous to the studies of blogging that divided personal vs hobby vs political blogging like Lenhart, A. and S. Fox (2006) "Bloggers: A Portrait of the Internet’s New Storytellers" Pew Internet & American Life Project http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/Bloggers.aspx (although with Twitter as with blogging there would of course be problems with people who tweet in a varied way). Even better, studies of the kinds of people who do each kind of tweeting? And which differentiate tweeters from retweeters?
I would like to quantify the (obvious) point that the number of active Tweeters on matters of journalistic interest adding comment or new information is vanishingly small and stratified compared to those who simply retweet or tweet on personal matters or just use Twitter to follow friends and celebrities. Did you know that 5% of Twitter users produced 75% of all activity, 21% had never tweeted themselves and 85% post less than once a day? Sysomos (2009) "Inside Twitter: An in-Depth Look inside the Twitter World " http://www.sysomos.com/insidetwitter/
PS Don't forget to check out (or contribute to) the Arab Spring literature collection I put together with some friends here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DU8AOlkTV6F0ZyoGcbk_060iBZG5tWKwj_n97EJP...
And here:
https://www.zotero.org/groups/arabspringmedia/items
PPS Will be making strenuous efforts to get to the conference so I look forward to seeing my tribe again!
-- David Brake (@drbrake http://davidbrake.org/) Senior Lecturer, Journalism & Communications, University of Bedfordshire http://www.beds.ac.uk/departments/jc +44 (0) 1582 743028
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
David, In our study of people who were live tweeting about a television program or televised event<http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3368/2779>, we coded tweets as "inbound" (tweets about themselves) vs "outbound" (tweets about the program), and objective (informational) vs. subjective, which created 4 types. We found that for a political program (Obama's Nobel prize acceptance speech), the proportion of inbound and outbound were similar, but for an entertainment program (So You Think You Can Dance), there were more inbound tweets. So maybe content is another variable you want to consider. As for the 5%, there have been many studies about contribution in peer-production communities such as Wikipedia that show that a very small number of people create original content. It's interesting but doesn't surprise me that similar trends are in Twitter use. :) Now that retweeting is much easier (one click as opposed to typing someone's tweet and adding RT in front of it) I'm sure it has become a more widespread practice. I would be interested in how you define who a "retweeter" is. I sometimes retweet, but I tweet original things more. Are there different degrees of retweeting, or can you identify a retweeter/non-retweeter? yvette
On 8/3/12 11:59 AM, David Brake wrote:
Dear AoIR,
Are there studies of Twitter use analysing proportion of people mostly tweeting about public issues vs private/interpersonal ones? Something analogous to the studies of blogging that divided personal vs hobby vs political blogging like Lenhart, A. and S. Fox (2006) "Bloggers: A Portrait of the Internet’s New Storytellers" Pew Internet & American Life Project http://www.pewinternet.org/**Reports/2006/Bloggers.aspx<http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/Bloggers.aspx>(although with Twitter as with blogging there would of course be problems with people who tweet in a varied way). Even better, studies of the kinds of people who do each kind of tweeting? And which differentiate tweeters from retweeters?
I would like to quantify the (obvious) point that the number of active Tweeters on matters of journalistic interest adding comment or new information is vanishingly small and stratified compared to those who simply retweet or tweet on personal matters or just use Twitter to follow friends and celebrities. Did you know that 5% of Twitter users produced 75% of all activity, 21% had never tweeted themselves and 85% post less than once a day? Sysomos (2009) "Inside Twitter: An in-Depth Look inside the Twitter World " http://www.sysomos.com/**insidetwitter/<http://www.sysomos.com/insidetwitter/>
PS Don't forget to check out (or contribute to) the Arab Spring literature collection I put together with some friends here:
https://docs.google.com/**document/d/**1DU8AOlkTV6F0ZyoGcbk_** 060iBZG5tWKwj_n97EJPe9M/edit?**pli=1<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DU8AOlkTV6F0ZyoGcbk_060iBZG5tWKwj_n97EJPe9M/edit?pli=1>
And here:
PPS Will be making strenuous efforts to get to the conference so I look forward to seeing my tribe again!
-- David Brake (@drbrake http://davidbrake.org/) Senior Lecturer, Journalism & Communications, University of Bedfordshire http://www.beds.ac.uk/**departments/jc<http://www.beds.ac.uk/departments/jc> +44 (0) 1582 743028
______________________________**_________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/** listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org<http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org>
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
______________________________**_________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/** listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org<http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org>
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- D. Yvette Wohn (@arcticpenguin) http://www.yvettewohn.com <http://arcticpenguin.wordpress.com>
participants (3)
-
Andrea Forte -
David Brake -
DY Wohn