Seeking a short introduction text on technological determinism vs. SCOT
Dear fellows, I have been struggling with the task of finding a simple short text for undergraduates that introduces the approaches of technological determinism (including utopia and dystopia) versus social construction of technology. Since the theoretical terrain has since been enriched with actor network theories and post phenomenology and so forth, it has become very hard to find a text that doesn't complicate this basic framework which fits a sophomore introductory level course. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Carmel Vaisman, PhD. The Multidisciplinary Program in the Humanities The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas Tel Aviv University http://www.absolutecarmel.com Twitter: @carmelva
Hi Carmel, I know you said “for undergrads” but I really feel the following pieces are very accessible and may be helpful with some guidance. Wyatt’s might be the most apropriate: - Dafoe, A. (2015). On Technological Determinism: A Typology, Scope Conditions, and a Mechanism. *Science, Technology & Human Values, 40*(6), 1047–1076. http://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915579283 - Fuller, M. (2015) The Forbidden Pleasures of Media Determining. In Ikoniadou, E., & Wilson, S. (Eds.). *Media After Kittler*. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International. - Wyatt, S. (2014). Technological Determinism Is Dead; Long Live Technological Determinism. In Scharff, R. C., & Dusek, V. (2014). Philosophy of Technology. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. -- Nathanael Bassett PhD Student | Department of Communication University of Illinois at Chicago t# 203.400.8203 twitter: mrliterati <http://twitter.com/mrliterati> url: mrliterati.com On February 18, 2018 at 9:02:58 AM, Carmel Vaisman (carmelv@gmail.com) wrote: Dear fellows, I have been struggling with the task of finding a simple short text for undergraduates that introduces the approaches of technological determinism (including utopia and dystopia) versus social construction of technology. Since the theoretical terrain has since been enriched with actor network theories and post phenomenology and so forth, it has become very hard to find a text that doesn't complicate this basic framework which fits a sophomore introductory level course. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Carmel Vaisman, PhD. The Multidisciplinary Program in the Humanities The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas Tel Aviv University http://www.absolutecarmel.com Twitter: @carmelva _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Hi Carmel, I’ve used Nancy Baym’s chapter “Making new media make sense” (from her book Personal Connections in the Digital Age) in a freshman class. It has worked really well. Best, Marissa Marissa J. Doshi, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Communication Hope College
On Feb 18, 2018, at 8:40 PM, Nathanael Bassett <nbasse2@uic.edu> wrote:
Hi Carmel,
I know you said “for undergrads” but I really feel the following pieces are very accessible and may be helpful with some guidance. Wyatt’s might be the most apropriate:
- Dafoe, A. (2015). On Technological Determinism: A Typology, Scope Conditions, and a Mechanism. *Science, Technology & Human Values, 40*(6), 1047–1076. http://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915579283 - Fuller, M. (2015) The Forbidden Pleasures of Media Determining. In Ikoniadou, E., & Wilson, S. (Eds.). *Media After Kittler*. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International. - Wyatt, S. (2014). Technological Determinism Is Dead; Long Live Technological Determinism. In Scharff, R. C., & Dusek, V. (2014). Philosophy of Technology. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
-- Nathanael Bassett PhD Student | Department of Communication University of Illinois at Chicago t# 203.400.8203 twitter: mrliterati <http://twitter.com/mrliterati> url: mrliterati.com
On February 18, 2018 at 9:02:58 AM, Carmel Vaisman (carmelv@gmail.com) wrote:
Dear fellows,
I have been struggling with the task of finding a simple short text for undergraduates that introduces the approaches of technological determinism (including utopia and dystopia) versus social construction of technology. Since the theoretical terrain has since been enriched with actor network theories and post phenomenology and so forth, it has become very hard to find a text that doesn't complicate this basic framework which fits a sophomore introductory level course. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Carmel Vaisman, PhD. The Multidisciplinary Program in the Humanities The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas Tel Aviv University http://www.absolutecarmel.com Twitter: @carmelva _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/ _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
I love all these suggestions. I've used Langdon Winner's "Do Artifacts Have Politics?" with students, and it's worked well. It needs a bit of contextualisation, though, and so last year I recorded a YouTube video to help them read it before class, so they'd be better prepared in class. They liked that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kicl0pXAJYQ We've often used it with the Wyatt piece mentioned below. The other works mentioned sound great too, I'll be checking those out before teaching the concepts next! Jill Jill Walker Rettberg Professor of Digital Culture University of Bergen http://jilltxt.net On 18/02/2018, 16:10, "Nathanael Bassett" <nbasse2@uic.edu> wrote: Hi Carmel, I know you said “for undergrads” but I really feel the following pieces are very accessible and may be helpful with some guidance. Wyatt’s might be the most apropriate: - Dafoe, A. (2015). On Technological Determinism: A Typology, Scope Conditions, and a Mechanism. *Science, Technology & Human Values, 40*(6), 1047–1076. http://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915579283 - Fuller, M. (2015) The Forbidden Pleasures of Media Determining. In Ikoniadou, E., & Wilson, S. (Eds.). *Media After Kittler*. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International. - Wyatt, S. (2014). Technological Determinism Is Dead; Long Live Technological Determinism. In Scharff, R. C., & Dusek, V. (2014). Philosophy of Technology. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. -- Nathanael Bassett PhD Student | Department of Communication University of Illinois at Chicago t# 203.400.8203 twitter: mrliterati <http://twitter.com/mrliterati> url: mrliterati.com On February 18, 2018 at 9:02:58 AM, Carmel Vaisman (carmelv@gmail.com) wrote: Dear fellows, I have been struggling with the task of finding a simple short text for undergraduates that introduces the approaches of technological determinism (including utopia and dystopia) versus social construction of technology. Since the theoretical terrain has since been enriched with actor network theories and post phenomenology and so forth, it has become very hard to find a text that doesn't complicate this basic framework which fits a sophomore introductory level course. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Carmel Vaisman, PhD. The Multidisciplinary Program in the Humanities The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas Tel Aviv University http://www.absolutecarmel.com Twitter: @carmelva _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Hi all, +1 for the Winner piece. I've used it for a long time and it works really well. Also recently I’ve started folding in a bit of Latour’s Reassembling the Social and that seems to work well alongside the Winner piece. Thanks for the video, Jill! Yours, Andy www.andrewchadwick.com<http://www.andrewchadwick.com> www.lboro.ac.uk/research/crcc<http://www.lboro.ac.uk/research/crcc> www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/socialsciences<http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/socialsciences> On 19 Feb 2018, at 3:15 , Jill Walker Rettberg <Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no<mailto:Jill.Walker.Rettberg@uib.no>> wrote: I love all these suggestions. I've used Langdon Winner's "Do Artifacts Have Politics?" with students, and it's worked well. It needs a bit of contextualisation, though, and so last year I recorded a YouTube video to help them read it before class, so they'd be better prepared in class. They liked that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kicl0pXAJYQ We've often used it with the Wyatt piece mentioned below. The other works mentioned sound great too, I'll be checking those out before teaching the concepts next! Jill Jill Walker Rettberg Professor of Digital Culture University of Bergen http://jilltxt.net On 18/02/2018, 16:10, "Nathanael Bassett" <nbasse2@uic.edu> wrote: Hi Carmel, I know you said “for undergrads” but I really feel the following pieces are very accessible and may be helpful with some guidance. Wyatt’s might be the most apropriate: - Dafoe, A. (2015). On Technological Determinism: A Typology, Scope Conditions, and a Mechanism. *Science, Technology & Human Values, 40*(6), 1047–1076. http://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915579283 - Fuller, M. (2015) The Forbidden Pleasures of Media Determining. In Ikoniadou, E., & Wilson, S. (Eds.). *Media After Kittler*. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International. - Wyatt, S. (2014). Technological Determinism Is Dead; Long Live Technological Determinism. In Scharff, R. C., & Dusek, V. (2014). Philosophy of Technology. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. -- Nathanael Bassett PhD Student | Department of Communication University of Illinois at Chicago t# 203.400.8203 twitter: mrliterati <http://twitter.com/mrliterati> url: mrliterati.com On February 18, 2018 at 9:02:58 AM, Carmel Vaisman (carmelv@gmail.com) wrote: Dear fellows, I have been struggling with the task of finding a simple short text for undergraduates that introduces the approaches of technological determinism (including utopia and dystopia) versus social construction of technology. Since the theoretical terrain has since been enriched with actor network theories and post phenomenology and so forth, it has become very hard to find a text that doesn't complicate this basic framework which fits a sophomore introductory level course. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Carmel Vaisman, PhD. The Multidisciplinary Program in the Humanities The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas Tel Aviv University http://www.absolutecarmel.com Twitter: @carmelva _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/ _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Hi, Carmen: I teach the second chapter from Nancy Baym's Making New Media Make Sense for classes ranging from upper division to freshman. She outlines all of these concepts in a very accessible way. Contact me off list if you need a copy to use; I'd be happy to share. Warm wishes, Les Hutchinson PhD Candidate Department of Writing, Rhetoric, & American Cultures Michigan State University 434 Farm Lane<x-apple-data-detectors://0/1> Rm 267 East Lansing, MI 48824 On Feb 18, 2018, at 10:04 AM, Carmel Vaisman <carmelv@gmail.com<mailto:carmelv@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear fellows, I have been struggling with the task of finding a simple short text for undergraduates that introduces the approaches of technological determinism (including utopia and dystopia) versus social construction of technology. Since the theoretical terrain has since been enriched with actor network theories and post phenomenology and so forth, it has become very hard to find a text that doesn't complicate this basic framework which fits a sophomore introductory level course. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Carmel Vaisman, PhD. The Multidisciplinary Program in the Humanities The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas Tel Aviv University http://www.absolutecarmel.com Twitter: @carmelva _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org<mailto:Air-L@listserv.aoir.org> mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Carmen: My students are reading this right now: *Chapter 3* of Quan-Haase, A. (2016). Technology and society: Inequality, power, and social networks (2nd ed.). Don Mills: Oxford University Press. - Aaron On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Carmel Vaisman <carmelv@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear fellows,
I have been struggling with the task of finding a simple short text for undergraduates that introduces the approaches of technological determinism (including utopia and dystopia) versus social construction of technology. Since the theoretical terrain has since been enriched with actor network theories and post phenomenology and so forth, it has become very hard to find a text that doesn't complicate this basic framework which fits a sophomore introductory level course. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Carmel Vaisman, PhD. The Multidisciplinary Program in the Humanities The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas Tel Aviv University http://www.absolutecarmel.com Twitter: @carmelva _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Hi Carmel, For a number of years I've used chapter 1 from Slack and Wise's Culture and Technology which is on the "Progress" narrative and a very a very patient introduction to critical engagements with culture and technology. They've just published a second edition and I will use their new chapter 1 "The Power and Problem of Culture, The Power and Problem of Technology". This is more like a primer for students to introduce the general field (and locate themselves reflexively with regards to their own use/devices/etc), then I explore specific theoretical approaches etc in subsequent weeks. You can also use their book for this. https://www.peterlang.com/view/product/69002 Cheers, Glen. -----Original Message----- From: Air-L [mailto:air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org] On Behalf Of Carmel Vaisman Sent: Monday, 19 February 2018 2:03 AM To: air-l@listserv.aoir.org Subject: [Air-L] Seeking a short introduction text on technological determinism vs. SCOT Dear fellows, I have been struggling with the task of finding a simple short text for undergraduates that introduces the approaches of technological determinism (including utopia and dystopia) versus social construction of technology. Since the theoretical terrain has since been enriched with actor network theories and post phenomenology and so forth, it has become very hard to find a text that doesn't complicate this basic framework which fits a sophomore introductory level course. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Carmel Vaisman, PhD. The Multidisciplinary Program in the Humanities The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas Tel Aviv University http://www.absolutecarmel.com Twitter: @carmelva _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
I have had success using the first two sections (p. 1-7) of the chapter "The Technology and the Society" from Raymond Williams' *Television: Technology and Cultural Form* as a short introduction to those two basic perspectives. Williams uses television to illustrate the different views of the relationship between technology and society (the book is from 1974). In addition to explaining the debate between the views of technological determinism and what he calls symptomatic technology, Williams also argues that this debate is a dead end because each view abstracts technology from society. The rest of the book is meant to offer an alternative approach — and one that I think remains an important alternative to consider in relation to the more recent theoretical approaches to technology and society. Brice Nixon, PhD Visiting Scholar, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania Adjunct Instructor, Department of Media Studies and Production, Temple University bricenixon.wordpress.com www.asc.upenn.edu/people/faculty/brice-nixon On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Carmel Vaisman <carmelv@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear fellows,
I have been struggling with the task of finding a simple short text for undergraduates that introduces the approaches of technological determinism (including utopia and dystopia) versus social construction of technology. Since the theoretical terrain has since been enriched with actor network theories and post phenomenology and so forth, it has become very hard to find a text that doesn't complicate this basic framework which fits a sophomore introductory level course. Any ideas?
Thanks in advance,
Carmel Vaisman, PhD. The Multidisciplinary Program in the Humanities The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas Tel Aviv University http://www.absolutecarmel.com Twitter: @carmelva _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/ listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
I was particularly impressed by Leah Lievrouw's chapter in a collection I co-edited, which was intended to bring together some of the theoretical tools about technology and society drawn both from STS and from pockets of Communication. It gestures to and digests a lot of the classic takes that have been mentioned in this thread. I think it teaches very well. = = = Lievrouw, Leah. 2014. “Materiality and Media in Communication and Technology Studies: An Unfinished Project.” In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo Boczkowski, and Kirsten Foot, 21–51. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.7551/mitpress/9780262... Abstract: A newly materialist approach to the study of media technologies is emerging in several fields, including cultural studies, digital humanities, and science and technology studies (STS). Yet most technology scholarship in the communication field, informed by classical media research, still follows a broadly constructivist line focused on the meanings, appropriations, representations and semiology of communication technology and its uses. This chapter explores the conceptualization of communication and media technologies at the intersection of STS and communication studies, surveying and comparing key concepts or schools of thought in each field. A framework for mediation is proposed as a way to theorize material artifacts, communication practices, and social arrangements or structures as mutually-constitutive elements of communication and media technology. = = = Tarleton On 2/19/18, 10:53 AM, "Air-L on behalf of Brice L Nixon" <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of bln222@nyu.edu> wrote: I have had success using the first two sections (p. 1-7) of the chapter "The Technology and the Society" from Raymond Williams' *Television: Technology and Cultural Form* as a short introduction to those two basic perspectives. Williams uses television to illustrate the different views of the relationship between technology and society (the book is from 1974). In addition to explaining the debate between the views of technological determinism and what he calls symptomatic technology, Williams also argues that this debate is a dead end because each view abstracts technology from society. The rest of the book is meant to offer an alternative approach — and one that I think remains an important alternative to consider in relation to the more recent theoretical approaches to technology and society. Brice Nixon, PhD Visiting Scholar, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania Adjunct Instructor, Department of Media Studies and Production, Temple University bricenixon.wordpress.com www.asc.upenn.edu/people/faculty/brice-nixon On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Carmel Vaisman <carmelv@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear fellows, > > I have been struggling with the task of finding a simple short text for > undergraduates that introduces the approaches of technological determinism > (including utopia and dystopia) versus social construction of technology. > Since the theoretical terrain has since been enriched with actor network > theories and post phenomenology and so forth, it has become very hard to > find a text that doesn't complicate this basic framework which fits a > sophomore introductory level course. Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance, > > > Carmel Vaisman, PhD. > The Multidisciplinary Program in the Humanities > The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas > Tel Aviv University > http://www.absolutecarmel.com > Twitter: @carmelva > _______________________________________________ > The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/ > listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > http://www.aoir.org/ > _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
There are more than a few wiki pieces on technological determinism and SCOT that qualify as introductory, e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_determinism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_construction_of_technology On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Tarleton L. Gillespie <tlg28@cornell.edu> wrote:
I was particularly impressed by Leah Lievrouw's chapter in a collection I co-edited, which was intended to bring together some of the theoretical tools about technology and society drawn both from STS and from pockets of Communication. It gestures to and digests a lot of the classic takes that have been mentioned in this thread. I think it teaches very well.
= = =
Lievrouw, Leah. 2014. “Materiality and Media in Communication and Technology Studies: An Unfinished Project.” In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo Boczkowski, and Kirsten Foot, 21–51. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.7551/mitpress/ 9780262525374.001.0001/upso-9780262525374-chapter-2
Abstract: A newly materialist approach to the study of media technologies is emerging in several fields, including cultural studies, digital humanities, and science and technology studies (STS). Yet most technology scholarship in the communication field, informed by classical media research, still follows a broadly constructivist line focused on the meanings, appropriations, representations and semiology of communication technology and its uses. This chapter explores the conceptualization of communication and media technologies at the intersection of STS and communication studies, surveying and comparing key concepts or schools of thought in each field. A framework for mediation is proposed as a way to theorize material artifacts, communication practices, and social arrangements or structures as mutually-constitutive elements of communication and media technology.
= = =
Tarleton
On 2/19/18, 10:53 AM, "Air-L on behalf of Brice L Nixon" < air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org on behalf of bln222@nyu.edu> wrote:
I have had success using the first two sections (p. 1-7) of the chapter "The Technology and the Society" from Raymond Williams' *Television: Technology and Cultural Form* as a short introduction to those two basic perspectives.
Williams uses television to illustrate the different views of the relationship between technology and society (the book is from 1974). In addition to explaining the debate between the views of technological determinism and what he calls symptomatic technology, Williams also argues that this debate is a dead end because each view abstracts technology from society. The rest of the book is meant to offer an alternative approach — and one that I think remains an important alternative to consider in relation to the more recent theoretical approaches to technology and society.
Brice Nixon, PhD Visiting Scholar, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania Adjunct Instructor, Department of Media Studies and Production, Temple University bricenixon.wordpress.com www.asc.upenn.edu/people/faculty/brice-nixon
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Carmel Vaisman <carmelv@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear fellows, > > I have been struggling with the task of finding a simple short text for > undergraduates that introduces the approaches of technological determinism > (including utopia and dystopia) versus social construction of technology. > Since the theoretical terrain has since been enriched with actor network > theories and post phenomenology and so forth, it has become very hard to > find a text that doesn't complicate this basic framework which fits a > sophomore introductory level course. Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance, > > > Carmel Vaisman, PhD. > The Multidisciplinary Program in the Humanities > The Cohn Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Ideas > Tel Aviv University > http://www.absolutecarmel.com > Twitter: @carmelva > _______________________________________________ > The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list > is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org > Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/ > listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org > > Join the Association of Internet Researchers: > http://www.aoir.org/ > _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/ listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/ listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
participants (11)
-
Aaron Hung -
Andrew Chadwick -
Brice L Nixon -
Carmel Vaisman -
Glen.Fuller -
Hutchinson, Les -
Jill Walker Rettberg -
Marissa Doshi -
Nathanael Bassett -
Tarleton L. Gillespie -
Thomas Ball