Hi everyone, I`m doing a research about the influence of web 2.0 in participation (or e-participation). At this moment I`m interested in the web 2.0 definition and web 3.0 definition. Can anyone recommend some must-read articles about web 2.0/web 3.0? Thank you Maria Manuel (PhD student at University of Minho, Portugal)
Dear Maria, Thanks for writing. Below, please find a list of some scholars that come to mind on these questions. danah boyd Eszter Hargittai Phil Howard Clay Shirky Barry Wellman Steve Jones There are lots more, too, but that list should give you a starting poiht. I hope it helps. Peter. On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 8:43 PM, MM Veloso <mmcv2012@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I`m doing a research about the influence of web 2.0 in participation (or e-participation). At this moment I`m interested in the web 2.0 definition and web 3.0 definition. Can anyone recommend some must-read articles about web 2.0/web 3.0? Thank you
Maria Manuel (PhD student at University of Minho, Portugal) _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- Peter Joseph Gloviczki, Ph.D. http://petergloviczki.com
Hello, I co-athored the following paper: Wu, L. and R. Ackland (2011), "How Web 1.0 Fails: The Mismatch Between Hyperlinks and Clickstreams," under review. http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.6095 where we use the following non-technical definition (this is from a revised version, slightly different to that on arxiv.org): Invented by Tim Berners Lee in 1991, the World Wide Web is regarded as the “largest human information construct in history” (http://webscience.org/webscience.html). The Web is commonly understood to have had three overlapping phases of development or eras. Under Web 1.0, webmasters provide content that is consumed by users, while Web 2.0 blurs the distinction between webmasters and users, with blogging tools, social network sites (e.g. Facebook) and microblog services (e.g. Twitter) enabling non-technical people to both produce and consume content (“prosumption”) [1]. Web 3.0, or the Semantic Web, involves technologies that make the Web more machine-readable, leading to a “web of data”, which is an evolution of the Web 1.0 “web of documents” [2]. [1] G. Ritzer and N. Jurgenson. Production, consumption, prosumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1):13, 2010. [2] N. Shadbolt, W. Hall, and T. Berners-Lee. The semantic web revisited. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 21(3):96–101, 2006. Best regards -- Dr Robert Ackland Associate Professor, Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute, The Australian National University Coordinator, Master of Social Research e-mail: robert.ackland@anu.edu.au homepage: https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/ackland-rj project: http://voson.anu.edu.au Information about the Master of Social Research (Social Science of the Internet specialisation): http://adsri.anu.edu.au/graduate-study/msr CRICOS No: 061772F -- On 14/10/12 12:43, MM Veloso wrote:
Hi everyone,
I`m doing a research about the influence of web 2.0 in participation (or e-participation). At this moment I`m interested in the web 2.0 definition and web 3.0 definition. Can anyone recommend some must-read articles about web 2.0/web 3.0? Thank you
Maria Manuel (PhD student at University of Minho, Portugal) _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Oi Maria : -} Please feel free to browse my website www.homerogdz.com Under the "publications" webpage you should find few papers that may help you in your research. You can also learn about useful studies checking the references I cite within my papers. There should be plenty then to get started... Good luck, HGZ Homero Gil de Zúñiga Assistant Professor Director CJCR: Community, Journalism & Communication Research journalism.utexas.edu/cjcr School of Journalism College of Communication University of Texas - Austin utexas.edu Voice (512) 471 63233 Fax (512) 471 7979 www.homerogdz.com Google Scholar Profile @_HGZ_ Robert Ackland <robert.ackland@anu.edu.au> wrote: Hello, I co-athored the following paper: Wu, L. and R. Ackland (2011), "How Web 1.0 Fails: The Mismatch Between Hyperlinks and Clickstreams," under review. http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.6095 where we use the following non-technical definition (this is from a revised version, slightly different to that on arxiv.org): Invented by Tim Berners Lee in 1991, the World Wide Web is regarded as the “largest human information construct in history” (http://webscience.org/webscience.html). The Web is commonly understood to have had three overlapping phases of development or eras. Under Web 1.0, webmasters provide content that is consumed by users, while Web 2.0 blurs the distinction between webmasters and users, with blogging tools, social network sites (e.g. Facebook) and microblog services (e.g. Twitter) enabling non-technical people to both produce and consume content (“prosumption”) [1]. Web 3.0, or the Semantic Web, involves technologies that make the Web more machine-readable, leading to a “web of data”, which is an evolution of the Web 1.0 “web of documents” [2]. [1] G. Ritzer and N. Jurgenson. Production, consumption, prosumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1):13, 2010. [2] N. Shadbolt, W. Hall, and T. Berners-Lee. The semantic web revisited. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 21(3):96–101, 2006. Best regards -- Dr Robert Ackland Associate Professor, Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute, The Australian National University Coordinator, Master of Social Research e-mail: robert.ackland@anu.edu.au homepage: https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/ackland-rj project: http://voson.anu.edu.au Information about the Master of Social Research (Social Science of the Internet specialisation): http://adsri.anu.edu.au/graduate-study/msr CRICOS No: 061772F -- On 14/10/12 12:43, MM Veloso wrote:
Hi everyone,
I`m doing a research about the influence of web 2.0 in participation (or e-participation). At this moment I`m interested in the web 2.0 definition and web 3.0 definition. Can anyone recommend some must-read articles about web 2.0/web 3.0? Thank you
Maria Manuel (PhD student at University of Minho, Portugal) _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
I would definitely read Christian Fuchs on this subject and there is a good issue of first Monday which focuses on Web 2.0 from some years ago, For a more abstracted approach to understanding the history of versions, you can read some of my stuff http://netcrit.net but probably those articles are just as useful for whom they cite, including some primary sources in the piece from 2009. Cheers Matt Professor Matthew Allen Head of Department, Internet Studies School of Media, Culture and Creative Arts Curtin University of Technology, CRICOS 00301J Australia +61 8 92663511 (v) +61 8 9266 3166 (f) ________________________________________ From: air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org [air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org] on behalf of MM Veloso [mmcv2012@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, 14 October 2012 9:43 AM To: air-l@listserv.aoir.org Subject: [Air-L] Web 2.0 Hi everyone, I`m doing a research about the influence of web 2.0 in participation (or e-participation). At this moment I`m interested in the web 2.0 definition and web 3.0 definition. Can anyone recommend some must-read articles about web 2.0/web 3.0? Thank you Maria Manuel (PhD student at University of Minho, Portugal) _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Hi Matthew, A critical view on user participation which is enabled and stimulated by technologies (including web 2.0 applications) can be found in Mirko Tobias Schäfer's book "Bastard Culture!" http://mtschaefer.net/media/uploads/docs/Schaefer_Bastard-Culture_2011.pdf Success with your research. Best regards, Kalina 2012/10/14 Matthew Allen <M.Allen@exchange.curtin.edu.au>
I would definitely read Christian Fuchs on this subject and there is a good issue of first Monday which focuses on Web 2.0 from some years ago,
For a more abstracted approach to understanding the history of versions, you can read some of my stuff http://netcrit.net but probably those articles are just as useful for whom they cite, including some primary sources in the piece from 2009.
Cheers Matt
Professor Matthew Allen Head of Department, Internet Studies School of Media, Culture and Creative Arts Curtin University of Technology, CRICOS 00301J Australia +61 8 92663511 (v) +61 8 9266 3166 (f)
________________________________________ From: air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org [air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org] on behalf of MM Veloso [mmcv2012@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, 14 October 2012 9:43 AM To: air-l@listserv.aoir.org Subject: [Air-L] Web 2.0
Hi everyone,
I`m doing a research about the influence of web 2.0 in participation (or e-participation). At this moment I`m interested in the web 2.0 definition and web 3.0 definition. Can anyone recommend some must-read articles about web 2.0/web 3.0? Thank you
Maria Manuel (PhD student at University of Minho, Portugal) _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- Kalina Dancheva | MA student in New media and Digital Culture at Utrecht University *[E]* kdancheva@gmail.com *[F]* facebook.com/kalina.dan *[T]* @kalinadan *[L]* linkedin.com/in/kalinadancheva
yes, the already mentioned authors are a great choice and key for research on web platforms. Here's the link to the already mentioned First Monday Issue: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2137/... Recently Trebor Scholz published the volume Digital Labour. The Internet as Playground and Factory http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415896955/ In my book Bastard Culture! How User Participation Transforms Cultural Production, I analyse how Web 2.0 actually represents an implementation of user practises into easy to use interfaces and new business models. I have also included a chapter on the ideological rhetoric of Web 2.0 and social media. The book is available for free download here: http://mtschaefer.net/entry/bastard-culture-how-user-participation-transform... Howard Rheingold's recent book Net Smart is in a way an answer to the critique formulated by Scholz and myself and it is a great analysis of media literacy and meaningful use in digital age: http://www.amazon.com/Net-Smart-How-Thrive-Online/dp/0262017458 cheers mirko PS: and again, I think re-reading Tim O'Reillys What is Web 2.0 is productive as well; it is brief but very much to the point and emphasises the role of back-end design, something that has been structurally neglected by the overly enthusiastic promoters of the so-called social media. http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html On 14.10.2012 07:00, Matthew Allen wrote:
I would definitely read Christian Fuchs on this subject and there is a good issue of first Monday which focuses on Web 2.0 from some years ago,
For a more abstracted approach to understanding the history of versions, you can read some of my stuff http://netcrit.net but probably those articles are just as useful for whom they cite, including some primary sources in the piece from 2009.
Cheers Matt
Professor Matthew Allen Head of Department, Internet Studies School of Media, Culture and Creative Arts Curtin University of Technology, CRICOS 00301J Australia +61 8 92663511 (v) +61 8 9266 3166 (f)
________________________________________ From: air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org [air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org] on behalf of MM Veloso [mmcv2012@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, 14 October 2012 9:43 AM To: air-l@listserv.aoir.org Subject: [Air-L] Web 2.0
Hi everyone,
I`m doing a research about the influence of web 2.0 in participation (or e-participation). At this moment I`m interested in the web 2.0 definition and web 3.0 definition. Can anyone recommend some must-read articles about web 2.0/web 3.0? Thank you
Maria Manuel (PhD student at University of Minho, Portugal) _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
i agree with mirko - it's well worth having a close look back at posts like oreilly's 'what is web 2.0'. whatever we think about the wider agenda, there are some prescient points e.g. notes about "lightweight programming models" that hint at the later development of agile methods, and predictions like "we expect the rise of proprietary databases to result in a Free Data movement within the next decade". not to mention a bit of a howler :) "Social networking systems like Friendster... lack the same scalability as the web." dan http://www.internetartizans.co.uk/ On 14 October 2012 13:37, Mirko Tobias Schaefer <m.t.schaefer@uu.nl> wrote:
yes, the already mentioned authors are a great choice and key for research on web platforms. Here's the link to the already mentioned First Monday Issue: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2137/...
Recently Trebor Scholz published the volume Digital Labour. The Internet as Playground and Factory http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415896955/
In my book Bastard Culture! How User Participation Transforms Cultural Production, I analyse how Web 2.0 actually represents an implementation of user practises into easy to use interfaces and new business models. I have also included a chapter on the ideological rhetoric of Web 2.0 and social media. The book is available for free download here: http://mtschaefer.net/entry/bastard-culture-how-user-participation-transform...
Howard Rheingold's recent book Net Smart is in a way an answer to the critique formulated by Scholz and myself and it is a great analysis of media literacy and meaningful use in digital age: http://www.amazon.com/Net-Smart-How-Thrive-Online/dp/0262017458
cheers mirko
PS: and again, I think re-reading Tim O'Reillys What is Web 2.0 is productive as well; it is brief but very much to the point and emphasises the role of back-end design, something that has been structurally neglected by the overly enthusiastic promoters of the so-called social media. http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
On 14.10.2012 07:00, Matthew Allen wrote:
I would definitely read Christian Fuchs on this subject and there is a good issue of first Monday which focuses on Web 2.0 from some years ago,
For a more abstracted approach to understanding the history of versions, you can read some of my stuff http://netcrit.net but probably those articles are just as useful for whom they cite, including some primary sources in the piece from 2009.
Cheers Matt
Professor Matthew Allen Head of Department, Internet Studies School of Media, Culture and Creative Arts Curtin University of Technology, CRICOS 00301J Australia +61 8 92663511 (v) +61 8 9266 3166 (f)
________________________________________ From: air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org [air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org] on behalf of MM Veloso [mmcv2012@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, 14 October 2012 9:43 AM To: air-l@listserv.aoir.org Subject: [Air-L] Web 2.0
Hi everyone,
I`m doing a research about the influence of web 2.0 in participation (or e-participation). At this moment I`m interested in the web 2.0 definition and web 3.0 definition. Can anyone recommend some must-read articles about web 2.0/web 3.0? Thank you
Maria Manuel (PhD student at University of Minho, Portugal) _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
In fact, the Web is currently developing Web <30, to be rolled out with Chrome 25, Firefox 20, Opera 15, and IE 10 later this winter. If you are interested in cutting-edge research and convolving observation with participation, you can take part in the design of Web <30 yourself. It is being developed through a massively multistakeholder open online crowd-refined platform generation (MMOOCRPG) design.[1] Building on the exponential success of past efforts,[2] the development mailing list includes a periodic distributed auto-immolating critique of its own work, where the future web is continuously redefined as its own dual.[30] Sam. [1] http://thepcspy.com/read/web_50__a_glimpse_of_the_future/ [2] http://www.minnick.com/ready-web-8-0/ [30] https://groups.google.com/group/building-a-distributed-decentralized-interne... On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:40 PM, dan mcquillan <dan@internetartizans.co.uk> wrote:
i agree with mirko - it's well worth having a close look back at posts like oreilly's 'what is web 2.0'.
whatever we think about the wider agenda, there are some prescient points e.g. notes about "lightweight programming models" that hint at the later development of agile methods, and predictions like "we expect the rise of proprietary databases to result in a Free Data movement within the next decade".
not to mention a bit of a howler :) "Social networking systems like Friendster... lack the same scalability as the web."
dan http://www.internetartizans.co.uk/
On 14 October 2012 13:37, Mirko Tobias Schaefer <m.t.schaefer@uu.nl> wrote:
yes, the already mentioned authors are a great choice and key for research on web platforms. Here's the link to the already mentioned First Monday Issue: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2137/...
Recently Trebor Scholz published the volume Digital Labour. The Internet as Playground and Factory http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415896955/
In my book Bastard Culture! How User Participation Transforms Cultural Production, I analyse how Web 2.0 actually represents an implementation of user practises into easy to use interfaces and new business models. I have also included a chapter on the ideological rhetoric of Web 2.0 and social media. The book is available for free download here: http://mtschaefer.net/entry/bastard-culture-how-user-participation-transform...
Howard Rheingold's recent book Net Smart is in a way an answer to the critique formulated by Scholz and myself and it is a great analysis of media literacy and meaningful use in digital age: http://www.amazon.com/Net-Smart-How-Thrive-Online/dp/0262017458
cheers mirko
PS: and again, I think re-reading Tim O'Reillys What is Web 2.0 is productive as well; it is brief but very much to the point and emphasises the role of back-end design, something that has been structurally neglected by the overly enthusiastic promoters of the so-called social media. http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
On 14.10.2012 07:00, Matthew Allen wrote:
I would definitely read Christian Fuchs on this subject and there is a good issue of first Monday which focuses on Web 2.0 from some years ago,
For a more abstracted approach to understanding the history of versions, you can read some of my stuff http://netcrit.net but probably those articles are just as useful for whom they cite, including some primary sources in the piece from 2009.
Cheers Matt
Professor Matthew Allen Head of Department, Internet Studies School of Media, Culture and Creative Arts Curtin University of Technology, CRICOS 00301J Australia +61 8 92663511 (v) +61 8 9266 3166 (f)
________________________________________ From: air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org [air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org] on behalf of MM Veloso [mmcv2012@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, 14 October 2012 9:43 AM To: air-l@listserv.aoir.org Subject: [Air-L] Web 2.0
Hi everyone,
I`m doing a research about the influence of web 2.0 in participation (or e-participation). At this moment I`m interested in the web 2.0 definition and web 3.0 definition. Can anyone recommend some must-read articles about web 2.0/web 3.0? Thank you
Maria Manuel (PhD student at University of Minho, Portugal) _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529 4266
Hi Maria, Here are some articles that I recommend for you to read: Fish, Adam, Murillo, Luis F. R., Nguyen, Lilly, Panofsky, Aaron, & Kelty, Christopher M. (2011). Birds of the Internet : Towards a field guide to the organization and governance of participation. Journal of Cultural Economy, 4(2), 157-187. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2011.563069 Hrastinski, Stefan. (2008). What is online learner participation? A literature review. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1755-1765. Quick, Kathryn S., & Feldman, Martha S. (2011). Distinguishing Participation and Inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research. doi: 10.1177/0739456x11410979 Sanford, Clive, & Rose, Jeremy. (2007). Characterizing eParticipation. International Journal of Information Management, 27(6), 406-421. Wexler, Mark N. (2011). Reconfiguring the sociology of the crowd: exploring crowdsourcing. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31(1/2), 6-20. In any case, the concept of "participation" is very broad and ambiguous. All social action can be defined as participation, whenever there is agency (not just determinist behaviour / forced labour). Maybe you could start with definining: who are participating? where? when? why? how? what participation? facilitated by whom? Good luck with your research! with kind regards, Arto Lanamäki Lecturer University of Agder, Norway ________________________________________ Lähettäjä: air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org [air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org] käyttäjän MM Veloso [mmcv2012@gmail.com] puolesta Lähetetty: 14. lokakuuta 2012 3:43 Vastaanottaja: air-l@listserv.aoir.org Aihe: [Air-L] Web 2.0 Hi everyone, I`m doing a research about the influence of web 2.0 in participation (or e-participation). At this moment I`m interested in the web 2.0 definition and web 3.0 definition. Can anyone recommend some must-read articles about web 2.0/web 3.0? Thank you Maria Manuel (PhD student at University of Minho, Portugal) _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Hi Maria: for many purposes I believe it is much more useful to conceptualize the development of the Web in a more continuous way (with earthshaking events along the way, of course), and I consider any serious attempts to empirically support the Web 1-2-3 conceptualization as failed. If you search the air-l archives you'll find a discussion Alex Havelais and others had a while back around this topic. Here is an additional piece of mine: Reips, U.-D., & Matzat, U. (2007). Web 2.0, Internet 2.1? International Journal of Internet Science, 2, 1-2. http://www.ijis.net/ijis2_1/ijis2_1_editorial_pre.html One quote from it: ""2.0" likely is an overblown marketing attempt. Surely, "Web 1.7" wouldn't catch on as much." All the best for your research! Kind regards Ulf At 2:43 Uhr +0100 14.10.2012, MM Veloso wrote:
Hi everyone,
I`m doing a research about the influence of web 2.0 in participation (or e-participation). At this moment I`m interested in the web 2.0 definition and web 3.0 definition. Can anyone recommend some must-read articles about web 2.0/web 3.0? Thank you
Maria Manuel (PhD student at University of Minho, Portugal) _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
You are going to go home with a wonderful list of resources about "web 2.0"! Here you have a critic to the "web 2.0" concept, by Tim Berbers-Lee: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/podcast/dwi/cm-int082206txt.html Best, Alejandro Tortolini Scitech journalist - Teacher Buenos Aires, Argentina
There is a recent article in New Media & Society by Matt Allen that could be of interest: What was Web 2.0? Versions as the dominant mode of internet history Abstract This paper explores Web 2.0 as the marker of a discourse about the nature and purpose of the internet in the recent past. It focuses on how Web 2.0 introduced to our thinking about the internet a discourse of versions. Such a discourse enables the telling of a ‘history’ of the internet which involves a complex interweaving of past, present and future, as represented by the additional versions which the introduction of Web 2.0 enabled. The paper concludes that the discourse of versions embodied in Web 2.0 obscures as much as it reveals, and suggests a new project based on investigations of the everyday memories of the internet by which individual users create their own histories of online technology. http://nms.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/07/03/1461444812451567.abstract Best wishes, Steve On Oct 13, 2012, at 8:43 PM, MM Veloso wrote:
Hi everyone,
I`m doing a research about the influence of web 2.0 in participation (or e-participation). At this moment I`m interested in the web 2.0 definition and web 3.0 definition. Can anyone recommend some must-read articles about web 2.0/web 3.0? Thank you
Maria Manuel (PhD student at University of Minho, Portugal) _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Dear Maria, I recently co-authored a paper in New Media & Society titled *"Does Web 3.0 come after Web 2.0? Deconstructing theoretical assumptions through practice" *. In the first part of the paper, in particular, we provide a review of current literature on Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 (including most of the scholars cited in this discussion) which might prove useful to you. Abstract Current internet research has been influenced by application developers and computer engineers who see the development of the Web as being divided into three different stages: Web 1.0, Web 2.0 and Web 3.0. This article will argue that this understanding – although important when analysing the political economy of the Web – can have serious limitations when applied to everyday contexts and the lived experience of technologies. Drawing from the context of the Italian student movement, we show that the division between Web 1.0, Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 is often deconstructed by activists’ media practices. Therefore, we highlight the importance of developing an approach that – by focusing on practice – draws attention to the interplay between Web platforms rather than their transition. This approach, we believe, is essential to the understanding of the complex relationship between Web developments, human negotiations and everyday social contexts. http://goo.gl/gh6F2 All the best, suerte! Emiliano -- * * *Emiliano Treré, PhD * Associate Professor | Faculty of Political and Social Sciences | Degree in Communication and Journalism | Autonomous University of Queretaro | Mexico *etrere@gmail.com* *http://it.linkedin.com/in/emilianotrere * * * On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Steve Jones <sjones@uic.edu> wrote:
There is a recent article in New Media & Society by Matt Allen that could be of interest:
What was Web 2.0? Versions as the dominant mode of internet history
Abstract
This paper explores Web 2.0 as the marker of a discourse about the nature and purpose of the internet in the recent past. It focuses on how Web 2.0 introduced to our thinking about the internet a discourse of versions. Such a discourse enables the telling of a ‘history’ of the internet which involves a complex interweaving of past, present and future, as represented by the additional versions which the introduction of Web 2.0 enabled. The paper concludes that the discourse of versions embodied in Web 2.0 obscures as much as it reveals, and suggests a new project based on investigations of the everyday memories of the internet by which individual users create their own histories of online technology.
http://nms.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/07/03/1461444812451567.abstract
Best wishes,
Steve
On Oct 13, 2012, at 8:43 PM, MM Veloso wrote:
Hi everyone,
I`m doing a research about the influence of web 2.0 in participation (or e-participation). At this moment I`m interested in the web 2.0 definition and web 3.0 definition. Can anyone recommend some must-read articles about web 2.0/web 3.0? Thank you
Maria Manuel (PhD student at University of Minho, Portugal) _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Going along with Steve, I'd definitely second the http://nms.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/07/03/1461444812451567.abstract article. Also, I believe that both Henry Jenkins' and Biella Coleman's new books (to be published soon!) have vivid critiques of Web 2.0 as a term. Alex --- Alexander Leavitt PhD Student USC Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism http://alexleavitt.com Twitter: @alexleavitt On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Emiliano Treré <emiliano.trere@uniud.it>wrote:
Dear Maria,
I recently co-authored a paper in New Media & Society titled *"Does Web 3.0 come after Web 2.0? Deconstructing theoretical assumptions through practice" *. In the first part of the paper, in particular, we provide a review of current literature on Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 (including most of the scholars cited in this discussion) which might prove useful to you.
Abstract
Current internet research has been influenced by application developers and computer engineers who see the development of the Web as being divided into three different stages: Web 1.0, Web 2.0 and Web 3.0. This article will argue that this understanding – although important when analysing the political economy of the Web – can have serious limitations when applied to everyday contexts and the lived experience of technologies. Drawing from the context of the Italian student movement, we show that the division between Web 1.0, Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 is often deconstructed by activists’ media practices. Therefore, we highlight the importance of developing an approach that – by focusing on practice – draws attention to the interplay between Web platforms rather than their transition. This approach, we believe, is essential to the understanding of the complex relationship between Web developments, human negotiations and everyday social contexts. http://goo.gl/gh6F2
All the best, suerte! Emiliano
-- * * *Emiliano Treré, PhD * Associate Professor | Faculty of Political and Social Sciences | Degree in Communication and Journalism | Autonomous University of Queretaro | Mexico *etrere@gmail.com* *http://it.linkedin.com/in/emilianotrere * * *
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Steve Jones <sjones@uic.edu> wrote:
There is a recent article in New Media & Society by Matt Allen that could be of interest:
What was Web 2.0? Versions as the dominant mode of internet history
Abstract
This paper explores Web 2.0 as the marker of a discourse about the nature and purpose of the internet in the recent past. It focuses on how Web 2.0 introduced to our thinking about the internet a discourse of versions. Such a discourse enables the telling of a ‘history’ of the internet which involves a complex interweaving of past, present and future, as represented by the additional versions which the introduction of Web 2.0 enabled. The paper concludes that the discourse of versions embodied in Web 2.0 obscures as much as it reveals, and suggests a new project based on investigations of the everyday memories of the internet by which individual users create their own histories of online technology.
http://nms.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/07/03/1461444812451567.abstract
Best wishes,
Steve
On Oct 13, 2012, at 8:43 PM, MM Veloso wrote:
Hi everyone,
I`m doing a research about the influence of web 2.0 in participation
(or
e-participation). At this moment I`m interested in the web 2.0 definition and web 3.0 definition. Can anyone recommend some must-read articles about web 2.0/web 3.0? Thank you
Maria Manuel (PhD student at University of Minho, Portugal) _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Ciao Maria, I see you are from Portugal - if you read Italian: Murero M. (2010) Digital Literacy: Introduzione ai Social Media, Libreria universitaria.it http://www.libreriauniversitaria.it/digital-literacy-introduzione-social-med... Monica Il giorno 14/ott/2012, alle ore 03:43, MM Veloso ha scritto:
Hi everyone,
I`m doing a research about the influence of web 2.0 in participation (or e-participation). At this moment I`m interested in the web 2.0 definition and web 3.0 definition. Can anyone recommend some must-read articles about web 2.0/web 3.0? Thank you
Maria Manuel (PhD student at University of Minho, Portugal) _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
participants (16)
-
Alejandro Tortolini -
Alex Leavitt -
Arto Lanamäki -
dan mcquillan -
Emiliano Treré -
Gil De Zuniga, Homero -
Kalina Dancheva -
Matthew Allen -
Mirko Tobias Schaefer -
MM Veloso -
Peter Gloviczki -
Prof. Murero -
Robert Ackland -
Samuel Klein -
Steve Jones -
Ulf-Dietrich Reips