CFP: Special Issue of ComPol on Fringe Democracy and Platformization of the Public Sphere (extended abstracts due 30 July 2024)
Dear AoIRists, My excellent colleagues Giovanni Boccia Artieri (University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Italy), Ehsan Dehghan (Queensland University of Technology, Australia), Laura Iannelli (University of Sassari, Italy), and I are now calling for extended abstract submissions to a special issue of Communicazione Politica on "Fringe Democracy and Platformization of the Public Sphere". Full details are here: https://www.compol.it/news/fringe-democracy-and-platformization-of-the-publi... The key dates are: Deadline for extended abstract submissions: July 30, 2024 to rivista@compol.it Decision by issue editors sent by: September 3, 2024 Full paper submissions: November 3, 2024 First round of reviews completed by: December 15, 2024 Resubmissions of papers: January 15, 2025 Second round of reviews completed by: January 30, 2025 Submission of final manuscripts: February 15, 2025 Description The contemporary landscape of digital communication is characterized by a complex interplay of public, semi-public, and private spaces (Boccia Artieri et al., 2021). These digital spaces differ in terms of visibility, regulation, and participation, but they are interconnected through reciprocal migration dynamics between "fringe" and mainstream digital media. Fringe platforms (de Winkel, 2023) are alternative platform services which explicitly contest the ideological premises and the practices of mainstream platforms. These platforms can offer diverse types of service (e.g., social media, streaming service, Appstore), express diverse ideologies (e.g., far-right, anarchist, anti-authoritarian positions), and put forward criticisms of various kinds (e.g., contesting Big Tech's personal data policies and accumulated power, advocating for diverse types of moderation, requesting to give voice to disadvantaged communities) (de Winkel, 2023; Herasimenka, 2022). These alternative digital spaces -- at once technical, cultural, and social -- are connected to disinformation ecosystems, to the spread of hate speech, and to the normalization of populist and extremist thought (Schulze et al., 2022; Walther & McCoy, 2021). Furthermore, despite their potential ideological variety, some scholars highlight the existence of a relationship of co-dependency and interdependence between the rise of alternative digital spaces and the growth of discursive forms associated with the far-right (e.g., Marwick et al., 2022; Schulze et al., 2022; Toernberg & Toernberg, 2024; Urman & Katz, 2022). For many years, fringe positions have leveraged the distribution power of mainstream social media platforms as "neutral channels," becoming part of the broader public debate, altering the very nature of political discussion, and destroying the conditions of the public sphere (Esau et al., 2023). With the term "fringe democracy," we refer to systems, practices, and political movements that exist on the periphery of traditional democratic norms and values, a "democracy from the margins" that tends to become increasingly visible in the online public sphere today. It can involve entities or political groups operating within a democratic framework but advocating for extreme or unconventional ideologies and methods of governance/participation. Fringe democracies often challenge or diverge from established democratic principles such as pluralism, inclusivity, respect for minority rights, and adherence to the rule of law. The main characteristics of fringe democracy are: Extremist ideologies: movements or parties that may hold radical views significantly diverging from traditional political thought, such as ultranationalism, (anti-)authoritarianism, anarchism, or radical populism. Marginalization from traditional politics: marginal democratic groups are typically sidelined from mainstream political discourse and may have limited influence within the broader political system. They often attract a smaller, more radicalized segment of the population. Questionable democratic practices: although they may participate in democratic processes such as elections, their commitment to democratic principles like fair play, tolerance, and dialogue may be weak. They might employ tactics that undermine democratic institutions or the electoral process. Controversial policies and rhetoric: these groups often advocate controversial or provocative policies that can polarize society. Their rhetoric may target specific groups, promoting division and sometimes inciting hatred or violence. Potential for destabilization: by challenging the norms and values of traditional democracy, fringe democratic movements can contribute to political instability. The concept of fringe democracy is increasingly linked to the transformation driven by the platformization of the media system (van Dijck et al., 2018), which indicates a process by which digital platforms' logics transform the communicative dynamics of politics and the public sphere. In particular, the relationship between the platformization of the public sphere and fringe democracy extends along several paths to be explored: Amplification of marginal voices and mobilization: Digital platforms provide fringe groups with powerful tools to disseminate their ideologies and messages. Social media, in particular, allows these groups to reach a global audience, bypassing traditional "gatekeepers" such as mainstream media and political institutions. Online platforms also enable marginal groups to organize and mobilize more efficiently. This has led to rapid growth and greater visibility for fringe movements, which can influence political agendas and public discourse. Growth of polarization and overexposure to marginal thinking: In digital environments, users are primarily exposed to information and viewpoints that reinforce their existing beliefs (dynamics of filter bubbles and echo chambers), which could accentuate polarization. This can intensify radical opinions and make fringe ideologies appear more widespread and accepted than they actually are in society at large. Disinformation and propaganda: The platformization process has facilitated the spread of disinformation and propaganda. Fringe groups often exploit these mechanisms to disseminate false or misleading information, manipulate public opinion, increase the toxicity of the discursive dimension, and discredit traditional democratic institutions and processes. Global reach and creation of fringe networks: Online platforms connect like-minded individuals across borders, allowing for the creation of transnational fringe networks. This global reach increases their influence and ability to share strategies, resources, and support. Alternative media ecosystems: Online platforms have enabled the creation of alternative media ecosystems where fringe groups can produce and distribute their content. These ecosystems often operate independently of the oversight and standards of traditional media, which can lead to the proliferation of extreme and unverified content. Monetization and funding: Many digital platforms offer monetization options, such as ad revenue, crowdfunding, and donations, which fringe groups can exploit to fund their activities. This financial support can sustain and grow their activities beyond what would be possible with traditional means. In summary, the process of platformization has significantly transformed the landscape of fringe democracy by enhancing the reach, organization, and impact of fringe groups. Understanding these dynamics is essential for investigating some of the central themes in political communication studies, such as the quality of the public sphere, the influence of media on the political agenda and mobilization practices, the relationship between the media ecosystem and political polarization, and the processes of mis/disinformation. However, the study of marginal groups and radical counter-platforms that are difficult for researchers to access also poses several methodological challenges (Jost et al., 2023; Peeters & Willaert, 2022; Rogers, 2020). We invite submissions that address topics including, but not limited to, the following: - the role of fringe platforms in the platformized public sphere and in the contemporary media ecosystem - strategies of amplification of marginal voices and the influence of this greater visibility on political agendas - practices of online global mobilization and funding of marginal radical groups - spaces of communication consistent with fringe ideologies and political polarization - fringe platforms, disinformation, manipulation, incivility, and propaganda - narratives, imaginaries, public discussion on fringe platforms Again, for more details please see: https://www.compol.it/news/fringe-democracy-and-platformization-of-the-publi... -- Prof. Axel Bruns FAHA (he/his) Australian Laureate Fellow, 2022-26: Polarisation and Partisanship a.bruns@qut.edu.au -- http://snurb.info/ -- @snurb_dot_info Programme Leader: Digital Publics QUT Digital Media Research Centre (DMRC) https://research.qut.edu.au/dmrc/ -- @qutdmrc -- @socialmediaQUT Chief Investigator: Australian Search Experience ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S) https://www.admscentre.org.au/ -- @admscentre Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia Z1-515, Creative Industries Precinct, Kelvin Grove, Qld. 4059, Australia GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld. 4001, Australia -- CRICOS No.: 00213J
Thank you for your email. I am currently out of the office on vacation and will have limited access to email. I will return on August 15th and will respond to your message as soon as possible after that date. Best regards Vielen Dank für Ihre E-Mail. Ich bin derzeit im Urlaub und habe nur eingeschränkten Zugang zu meinen E-Mails. Ich kehre am 15. August zurück und werde Ihre Nachricht so bald wie möglich nach diesem Datum beantworten. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Paloma On 18 Jul 2024, at 13:16, Axel Bruns via Air-L <air-l@listserv.aoir.org> wrote:
Dear AoIRists,
My excellent colleagues Giovanni Boccia Artieri (University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Italy), Ehsan Dehghan (Queensland University of Technology, Australia), Laura Iannelli (University of Sassari, Italy), and I are now calling for extended abstract submissions to a special issue of Communicazione Politica on "Fringe Democracy and Platformization of the Public Sphere". Full details are here: https://www.compol.it/news/fringe-democracy-and-platformization-of-the-publi...
The key dates are:
Deadline for extended abstract submissions: July 30, 2024 to rivista@compol.it Decision by issue editors sent by: September 3, 2024 Full paper submissions: November 3, 2024 First round of reviews completed by: December 15, 2024 Resubmissions of papers: January 15, 2025 Second round of reviews completed by: January 30, 2025 Submission of final manuscripts: February 15, 2025
Description
The contemporary landscape of digital communication is characterized by a complex interplay of public, semi-public, and private spaces (Boccia Artieri et al., 2021). These digital spaces differ in terms of visibility, regulation, and participation, but they are interconnected through reciprocal migration dynamics between "fringe" and mainstream digital media. Fringe platforms (de Winkel, 2023) are alternative platform services which explicitly contest the ideological premises and the practices of mainstream platforms. These platforms can offer diverse types of service (e.g., social media, streaming service, Appstore), express diverse ideologies (e.g., far-right, anarchist, anti-authoritarian positions), and put forward criticisms of various kinds (e.g., contesting Big Tech's personal data policies and accumulated power, advocating for diverse types of moderation, requesting to give voice to disadvantaged communities) (de Winkel, 2023; Herasimenka, 2022). These alternative digital spa ces -- at once technical, cultural, and social -- are connected to disinformation ecosystems, to the spread of hate speech, and to the normalization of populist and extremist thought (Schulze et al., 2022; Walther & McCoy, 2021). Furthermore, despite their potential ideological variety, some scholars highlight the existence of a relationship of co-dependency and interdependence between the rise of alternative digital spaces and the growth of discursive forms associated with the far-right (e.g., Marwick et al., 2022; Schulze et al., 2022; Toernberg & Toernberg, 2024; Urman & Katz, 2022).
For many years, fringe positions have leveraged the distribution power of mainstream social media platforms as "neutral channels," becoming part of the broader public debate, altering the very nature of political discussion, and destroying the conditions of the public sphere (Esau et al., 2023). With the term "fringe democracy," we refer to systems, practices, and political movements that exist on the periphery of traditional democratic norms and values, a "democracy from the margins" that tends to become increasingly visible in the online public sphere today. It can involve entities or political groups operating within a democratic framework but advocating for extreme or unconventional ideologies and methods of governance/participation. Fringe democracies often challenge or diverge from established democratic principles such as pluralism, inclusivity, respect for minority rights, and adherence to the rule of law. The main characteristics of fringe democracy are:
Extremist ideologies: movements or parties that may hold radical views significantly diverging from traditional political thought, such as ultranationalism, (anti-)authoritarianism, anarchism, or radical populism.
Marginalization from traditional politics: marginal democratic groups are typically sidelined from mainstream political discourse and may have limited influence within the broader political system. They often attract a smaller, more radicalized segment of the population.
Questionable democratic practices: although they may participate in democratic processes such as elections, their commitment to democratic principles like fair play, tolerance, and dialogue may be weak. They might employ tactics that undermine democratic institutions or the electoral process.
Controversial policies and rhetoric: these groups often advocate controversial or provocative policies that can polarize society. Their rhetoric may target specific groups, promoting division and sometimes inciting hatred or violence.
Potential for destabilization: by challenging the norms and values of traditional democracy, fringe democratic movements can contribute to political instability.
The concept of fringe democracy is increasingly linked to the transformation driven by the platformization of the media system (van Dijck et al., 2018), which indicates a process by which digital platforms' logics transform the communicative dynamics of politics and the public sphere.
In particular, the relationship between the platformization of the public sphere and fringe democracy extends along several paths to be explored:
Amplification of marginal voices and mobilization: Digital platforms provide fringe groups with powerful tools to disseminate their ideologies and messages. Social media, in particular, allows these groups to reach a global audience, bypassing traditional "gatekeepers" such as mainstream media and political institutions. Online platforms also enable marginal groups to organize and mobilize more efficiently. This has led to rapid growth and greater visibility for fringe movements, which can influence political agendas and public discourse.
Growth of polarization and overexposure to marginal thinking: In digital environments, users are primarily exposed to information and viewpoints that reinforce their existing beliefs (dynamics of filter bubbles and echo chambers), which could accentuate polarization. This can intensify radical opinions and make fringe ideologies appear more widespread and accepted than they actually are in society at large.
Disinformation and propaganda: The platformization process has facilitated the spread of disinformation and propaganda. Fringe groups often exploit these mechanisms to disseminate false or misleading information, manipulate public opinion, increase the toxicity of the discursive dimension, and discredit traditional democratic institutions and processes.
Global reach and creation of fringe networks: Online platforms connect like-minded individuals across borders, allowing for the creation of transnational fringe networks. This global reach increases their influence and ability to share strategies, resources, and support.
Alternative media ecosystems: Online platforms have enabled the creation of alternative media ecosystems where fringe groups can produce and distribute their content. These ecosystems often operate independently of the oversight and standards of traditional media, which can lead to the proliferation of extreme and unverified content.
Monetization and funding: Many digital platforms offer monetization options, such as ad revenue, crowdfunding, and donations, which fringe groups can exploit to fund their activities. This financial support can sustain and grow their activities beyond what would be possible with traditional means.
In summary, the process of platformization has significantly transformed the landscape of fringe democracy by enhancing the reach, organization, and impact of fringe groups. Understanding these dynamics is essential for investigating some of the central themes in political communication studies, such as the quality of the public sphere, the influence of media on the political agenda and mobilization practices, the relationship between the media ecosystem and political polarization, and the processes of mis/disinformation. However, the study of marginal groups and radical counter-platforms that are difficult for researchers to access also poses several methodological challenges (Jost et al., 2023; Peeters & Willaert, 2022; Rogers, 2020).
We invite submissions that address topics including, but not limited to, the following:
- the role of fringe platforms in the platformized public sphere and in the contemporary media ecosystem - strategies of amplification of marginal voices and the influence of this greater visibility on political agendas - practices of online global mobilization and funding of marginal radical groups - spaces of communication consistent with fringe ideologies and political polarization - fringe platforms, disinformation, manipulation, incivility, and propaganda - narratives, imaginaries, public discussion on fringe platforms
Again, for more details please see: https://www.compol.it/news/fringe-democracy-and-platformization-of-the-publi...
--
Prof. Axel Bruns FAHA (he/his)
Australian Laureate Fellow, 2022-26: Polarisation and Partisanship
a.bruns@qut.edu.au -- http://snurb.info/ -- @snurb_dot_info
Programme Leader: Digital Publics
QUT Digital Media Research Centre (DMRC)
https://research.qut.edu.au/dmrc/ -- @qutdmrc -- @socialmediaQUT
Chief Investigator: Australian Search Experience
ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S)
https://www.admscentre.org.au/ -- @admscentre
Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
Z1-515, Creative Industries Precinct, Kelvin Grove, Qld. 4059, Australia
GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld. 4001, Australia -- CRICOS No.: 00213J
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
participants (2)
-
Axel Bruns -
Paloma Viejo Otero