Re: [Air-l] Panel about Quality on the Internet
Hi Paul, I am currently working with another member trying to put together a panel on time and space, however, we are having a bit of trouble with following through from the others who initially expressed interest. As you may recall, must of my work is focussed on traditional research being done in non-traditional ways via the internet and what differences might be attributed to that process. Currently, I am about to begin writing about the transpositions of space and time in electronic culture and the implications for academic research, particularly in terms of the current schism between institutional structures within the Academy and the funding agencies being constructed to respond to a different space/time paradigm. These implications are important to the quality of research because in many cases the actual research and alliances far exceed the geopolitical structures of the actual physical institutions, which "house" the research, provide the support, etc. I am going to attempt to address some of the policy implications and the evidences of self-organizing structures, which have addressed some of these issues. I believe the internet has been integral to this phenomenon. In case this isn't making sense. NASA is a reasonable example. It now well exceeds the boundaries of US involvement to be successful, but because of it's non-specific attachment to the US (or anywhere else), is no longer is supported in a way that it was when it represented a more symbolic manifestation of national power. On the other hand, other nations have trouble with support as well. The EU, itself may be another good example of the complexities of more global organization and the affect on the quality of scientific research or quite conversely, since the scientific community is even frequently less physically bounded than the institutions with which it is associated (eventhough, it always has had cross national boundaries), what implications does this have for the quality of science? What part do the multinational corporations play, if governments aren't as aggressively multinational in supporting science as well? If this is of interest, please let me know and I will let you know if we haven't gotten the other panel together. Actually, for this panel I would be much more interested in talking about the policy implications from this work. For the other panel, I am proposing to talk more theoretically about what's happening with time and space. Thanks, IB Irene Berkowitz Program Director, Curricular Publications and Systems Office of the Vice Provost Temple University tel. 215-204-7596 fax. 215-204 3175 berkowitz@mail.temple.edu
Paul.Wouters@niwi.knaw.nl 02/18/2003 11:37:00 AM >>> Dear colleagues,
I will be submitting a paper on the construction of scientific quality and the internet to the next conference in Toronto. It might be a nice idea to see whether we can bring together papers about quality (which may be defined in very different ways and discuss diverse aspects of "quality") in different areas together in one session or panel. So this is a call for everyone interested, especially PhD students, to send me titles and abstracts before Wednesday February 26. If there is enough interest it might become an interesting session. Looking forward to your responses! Regards Paul Wouters Dr. P. F. Wouters Programme Leader Networked Research and Digital Information (Nerdi) NIWI-KNAW The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences PO Box 95110 1090 HC Amsterdam The Netherlands T 3120 4628654 F 3120 6658013 http://www.niwi.knaw.nl/nerdi paul.wouters@niwi.knaw.nl _______________________________________________ Air-l mailing list Air-l@aoir.org http://www.aoir.org/mailman/listinfo/air-l
Dear AIR'ers - I lost the email that was specifically referring to 'critical mass' and notions of quality, and wanted to add this: 'Critical mass' as I understand the concept is part of the theory of 'network effect' - quite well known by most on this list, but well worth a quick review. Network effect is the exponential effect or multiplier that works as new technology is added, node by node to an existing technological development. Just wanted to say that this specific effect has not informed quality, as I understand it, without an appropriate unit of analysis other than mass popularity (i.e., VHS vs. Beta). However, with a unit of analysis in place, this if PC/Mac monitor - this monitor is of a higher quality because it has more pixels (pixels being the unit of analysis). This works qualitatively as well, as in "this monitors looks better than this one" (yes/no) as long as there is some notion of a specific guideline informing the decision. Saying the internet is of a better quality than other communciative devices, I would want to know: 1) what is the unit of analysis? (more information, more images, more etc. does not necessarily indicate a communication device of any better quality) but rather, I guess, the ratio of signal/noise 2) how are we measuring this unit that indicates higher quality? Just some thoughts from Australia that reach you from 'tommorrow' to your 'today' - Denise ===== "I want to focus on my salad" (M. Stewart, 2002) Denise N. Rall, Sustainable Forestry Mentoring Coordinator & PhD student, School of Education, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW, 2480 Australia Phone +61-2-6624-8627 Fax +61-2-6624-8637 Office (Tuesdays) (02) 6620 3577 Mob 0438 233 344 http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/edu/research/deniserall/index.html __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/
participants (2)
-
Denise N. Rall -
Irene Berkowitz