Qualitative Data Analysis Software
Dear AOIRistas I am about to a deep dive into a set of ethnographic interviews and was wondering if people would be willing to share their experiences and preferences with different software packages. My only experience is with QSR Nudist and Qualrus, neither of which was a happy time. Thanks Andrew
Dear Andrew, I have also worked with large ethnograpic data, and in my experience NVivo 9 is a great option. Cheers Rafael A. Enviado do Yahoo Mail no Android De:"Andrew Herman" <aherman@wlu.ca> Data:12:44 Qua., 13 de mai de PM Assunto:[Air-L] Qualitative Data Analysis Software Dear AOIRistas I am about to a deep dive into a set of ethnographic interviews and was wondering if people would be willing to share their experiences and preferences with different software packages. My only experience is with QSR Nudist and Qualrus, neither of which was a happy time. Thanks Andrew _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
If its only text data, please try WEFT. http://www.pressure.to/qda/ Its open source, simple to use, only 35 pages manual. You may like to see how it is cited in an article too: http://www.innovation-entrepreneurship.com/content/1/1/4 Regards, Vignesh. http://web.iitd.ac.in/~vignes/ _______________________________________ P. VIGNESWARA ILAVARASAN, PhD Dept. of Management Studies Indian Institute of Technology Delhi Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016 India M:+91 9910230407; O: +91 11 2659 1174; H: +91 11 2659 1936. E: vignes@iitd.ac.in W:http://web.iitd.ac.in/~vignes/ On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Andrew Herman <aherman@wlu.ca> wrote:
Dear AOIRistas
I am about to a deep dive into a set of ethnographic interviews and was wondering if people would be willing to share their experiences and preferences with different software packages. My only experience is with QSR Nudist and Qualrus, neither of which was a happy time.
Thanks
Andrew _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Hi Andrew, I analysed my interviews using QSR NVivo 9 and have also used v.10 for smaller amounts of text. I find it intuitive and extremely useful - though expensive! You can get a 30 day free trial at the website ( qsrinternational.com) to see what you think. Cheers, and good luck! Sarah On 13 May 2015 at 12:43, Andrew Herman <aherman@wlu.ca> wrote:
Dear AOIRistas
I am about to a deep dive into a set of ethnographic interviews and was wondering if people would be willing to share their experiences and preferences with different software packages. My only experience is with QSR Nudist and Qualrus, neither of which was a happy time.
Thanks
Andrew _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
If you can chunk the data into speech acts: http://cat.ucsur.pitt.edu/ - free - cloud - OS independent - collaborative - tools for measurement of accuracy and reliability On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Sarah Merry <skmerry@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I analysed my interviews using QSR NVivo 9 and have also used v.10 for smaller amounts of text. I find it intuitive and extremely useful - though expensive! You can get a 30 day free trial at the website ( qsrinternational.com) to see what you think.
Cheers, and good luck!
Sarah
On 13 May 2015 at 12:43, Andrew Herman <aherman@wlu.ca> wrote:
Dear AOIRistas
I am about to a deep dive into a set of ethnographic interviews and was wondering if people would be willing to share their experiences and preferences with different software packages. My only experience is with QSR Nudist and Qualrus, neither of which was a happy time.
Thanks
Andrew _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- Dr. Stuart W. Shulmanhttp://people.umass.edu/stu Founder and CEO, Texifterhttp://texifter.com LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/stuartwshulman Twitterhttps://twitter.com/StuartWShulman
Hi all, I've used NVivo and Atlas Ti... But I recently discovered Dedoose (online tool) and I would pick Dedoose with no doubt and never go back to the others!!! It's cheaper, easier, you can use it from any computer, and several people can work on the same project at the same time (without becoming crazy in the process). I reccommend Dedoose! I have not tries Cat, though. Sara
On 13-mag-2015, at 07:28, Stuart Shulman <stuart.shulman@gmail.com> wrote:
If you can chunk the data into speech acts:
- free - cloud - OS independent - collaborative - tools for measurement of accuracy and reliability
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Sarah Merry <skmerry@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I analysed my interviews using QSR NVivo 9 and have also used v.10 for smaller amounts of text. I find it intuitive and extremely useful - though expensive! You can get a 30 day free trial at the website ( qsrinternational.com) to see what you think.
Cheers, and good luck!
Sarah
On 13 May 2015 at 12:43, Andrew Herman <aherman@wlu.ca> wrote:
Dear AOIRistas
I am about to a deep dive into a set of ethnographic interviews and was wondering if people would be willing to share their experiences and preferences with different software packages. My only experience is with QSR Nudist and Qualrus, neither of which was a happy time.
Thanks
Andrew _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
--
Dr. Stuart W. Shulmanhttp://people.umass.edu/stu
Founder and CEO, Texifterhttp://texifter.com
LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/stuartwshulman
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/StuartWShulman _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Dedoose is great. Just to throw another option out there - depending on your preferences, a writing-based software (I use Scrivener <https://www.literatureandlatte.com/scrivener.php>) might work too. It has a really intuitive and helpful organization system for documents, allows you to make comments on documents and search through those comments just like you would with Dedoose, but it segues more naturally into writing, which I like a lot. But, it doesn't have all of the neat data visualization features that Dedoose, NVivo and some of the other programs have. Just a thought! On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sara Vannini <sara.vannini.usi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I've used NVivo and Atlas Ti... But I recently discovered Dedoose (online tool) and I would pick Dedoose with no doubt and never go back to the others!!! It's cheaper, easier, you can use it from any computer, and several people can work on the same project at the same time (without becoming crazy in the process). I reccommend Dedoose! I have not tries Cat, though.
Sara
On 13-mag-2015, at 07:28, Stuart Shulman <stuart.shulman@gmail.com> wrote:
If you can chunk the data into speech acts:
- free - cloud - OS independent - collaborative - tools for measurement of accuracy and reliability
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Sarah Merry <skmerry@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I analysed my interviews using QSR NVivo 9 and have also used v.10 for smaller amounts of text. I find it intuitive and extremely useful - though expensive! You can get a 30 day free trial at the website ( qsrinternational.com) to see what you think.
Cheers, and good luck!
Sarah
On 13 May 2015 at 12:43, Andrew Herman <aherman@wlu.ca> wrote:
Dear AOIRistas
I am about to a deep dive into a set of ethnographic interviews and was wondering if people would be willing to share their experiences and preferences with different software packages. My only experience is with QSR Nudist and Qualrus, neither of which was a happy time.
Thanks
Andrew _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
--
Dr. Stuart W. Shulmanhttp://people.umass.edu/stu
Founder and CEO, Texifterhttp://texifter.com
LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/stuartwshulman
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/StuartWShulman _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- Julia (Schroeder) Ticona, PhD Candidate juliaticona.com UVA Dept. of Sociology Wellesley College '09
I used devonTHINK to code ~13k emails for my SM thesis. It was well-suited to handling / categorizing / cross referencing / annotating many documents and more robust for same than most of the standard options. ___________________________ Sent by the magic of mobile technology
On May 13, 2015, at 12:27 PM, Julia Ticona <js5pd@virginia.edu> wrote:
Dedoose is great. Just to throw another option out there - depending on your preferences, a writing-based software (I use Scrivener <https://www.literatureandlatte.com/scrivener.php>) might work too. It has a really intuitive and helpful organization system for documents, allows you to make comments on documents and search through those comments just like you would with Dedoose, but it segues more naturally into writing, which I like a lot. But, it doesn't have all of the neat data visualization features that Dedoose, NVivo and some of the other programs have. Just a thought!
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sara Vannini <sara.vannini.usi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I've used NVivo and Atlas Ti... But I recently discovered Dedoose (online tool) and I would pick Dedoose with no doubt and never go back to the others!!! It's cheaper, easier, you can use it from any computer, and several people can work on the same project at the same time (without becoming crazy in the process). I reccommend Dedoose! I have not tries Cat, though.
Sara
On 13-mag-2015, at 07:28, Stuart Shulman <stuart.shulman@gmail.com> wrote:
If you can chunk the data into speech acts:
- free - cloud - OS independent - collaborative - tools for measurement of accuracy and reliability
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Sarah Merry <skmerry@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I analysed my interviews using QSR NVivo 9 and have also used v.10 for smaller amounts of text. I find it intuitive and extremely useful - though expensive! You can get a 30 day free trial at the website ( qsrinternational.com) to see what you think.
Cheers, and good luck!
Sarah
On 13 May 2015 at 12:43, Andrew Herman <aherman@wlu.ca> wrote:
Dear AOIRistas
I am about to a deep dive into a set of ethnographic interviews and was wondering if people would be willing to share their experiences and preferences with different software packages. My only experience is with QSR Nudist and Qualrus, neither of which was a happy time.
Thanks
Andrew _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
--
Dr. Stuart W. Shulmanhttp://people.umass.edu/stu
Founder and CEO, Texifterhttp://texifter.com
LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/stuartwshulman
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/StuartWShulman _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- Julia (Schroeder) Ticona, PhD Candidate juliaticona.com UVA Dept. of Sociology Wellesley College '09 _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
While we’re at this topic, what software you guys recommend for Content Analysis that accepts csv/excel files as the source? NVivo10 is a good option for your case. It takes a bit to get used to but for working with textual data it can be great. Not familiar with dedoose, but I’ll take a look at it :)
Em 13/05/2015, à(s) 13:27, Julia Ticona <js5pd@virginia.edu> escreveu:
Dedoose is great. Just to throw another option out there - depending on your preferences, a writing-based software (I use Scrivener <https://www.literatureandlatte.com/scrivener.php>) might work too. It has a really intuitive and helpful organization system for documents, allows you to make comments on documents and search through those comments just like you would with Dedoose, but it segues more naturally into writing, which I like a lot. But, it doesn't have all of the neat data visualization features that Dedoose, NVivo and some of the other programs have. Just a thought!
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sara Vannini <sara.vannini.usi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I've used NVivo and Atlas Ti... But I recently discovered Dedoose (online tool) and I would pick Dedoose with no doubt and never go back to the others!!! It's cheaper, easier, you can use it from any computer, and several people can work on the same project at the same time (without becoming crazy in the process). I reccommend Dedoose! I have not tries Cat, though.
Sara
On 13-mag-2015, at 07:28, Stuart Shulman <stuart.shulman@gmail.com> wrote:
If you can chunk the data into speech acts:
- free - cloud - OS independent - collaborative - tools for measurement of accuracy and reliability
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Sarah Merry <skmerry@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I analysed my interviews using QSR NVivo 9 and have also used v.10 for smaller amounts of text. I find it intuitive and extremely useful - though expensive! You can get a 30 day free trial at the website ( qsrinternational.com) to see what you think.
Cheers, and good luck!
Sarah
On 13 May 2015 at 12:43, Andrew Herman <aherman@wlu.ca> wrote:
Dear AOIRistas
I am about to a deep dive into a set of ethnographic interviews and was wondering if people would be willing to share their experiences and preferences with different software packages. My only experience is with QSR Nudist and Qualrus, neither of which was a happy time.
Thanks
Andrew _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
--
Dr. Stuart W. Shulmanhttp://people.umass.edu/stu
Founder and CEO, Texifterhttp://texifter.com
LinkedInhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/stuartwshulman
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/StuartWShulman _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- Julia (Schroeder) Ticona, PhD Candidate juliaticona.com UVA Dept. of Sociology Wellesley College '09 _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
DiscoverText.com takes CSV files and is free for 30 days with machine learning. On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Patricia Rossini <patyrossini@gmail.com> wrote:
While we’re at this topic, what software you guys recommend for Content Analysis that accepts csv/excel files as the source?
participants (9)
-
Andrew Herman -
Chris Peterson -
Julia Ticona -
P. VIGNESWARA ILAVARASAN -
Patricia Rossini -
rafael alarcon -
Sara Vannini -
Sarah Merry -
Stuart Shulman