Comments and/or action period ends on May 27. miraj ///// Student of Concern Will we be more secure -- or just less competitive -- if the government forces hundreds of thousands of international science students to get export licenses simply to look through a microscope? By CRISTI HEGRANES http://www.sfweekly.com/issues/2005-05-18/news/feature.html?src=default_rss [snip] ... New federal rules proposed by the Department of Commerce in March could impede Gupta's access to educational equipment and force him to apply for government licenses to use specific technology in the classroom, each of which could take months to acquire. In fact, hundreds of thousands of international students and scientists working and studying in the U.S. could lose access to equipment and technology that they have had routine use of until now. Because Gupta is studying chemical engineering, he will eventually encounter what the government calls "dual-use technology" -- technology that has both civilian and military applications. Under the new Commerce Department proposal, the use of everything from basic computer systems, semiconductors, and training manuals to microscopes and telescopes will require some international students to apply for government licenses before they can legally have access to or study the technology. [snip] *** Despite the potential for negative long-term consequences from the new deemed export licensing rules, their implementation will never be voted on in the Senate or issued by executive order. Rather, the State Department, which has full authority to implement any export restriction it sees fit, published the proposed rules for a 60-day discussion period that will end on May 27. During that time the department will take into consideration comments and opinions from anyone interested enough to send one. That is, if anyone is aware of the issue. ...As the 60-day discussion period goes on mostly unnoticed, many worry that at this point, nothing can be done about the proposed regulation of foreign students as deemed exports. For students and educators alike, the rules seem stifling and unfair *** http://www.sfweekly.com/issues/2005-05-18/news/feature.html?src=default_rss Miraj Khaled ============ techiemik@yahoo.com mindexplorer.blogspot.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
http://www.sfweekly.com/issues/2005-05-18/news/feature.html?src=default_rss Forcing students to get "export" permits for participation in certain university courses is just horrible! I've known for a while that there are so called "black listed" college majors. If you are either a student or a professor in any of these majors it is a lot more difficult for you to get a visa for the US. The list is long and you'd be surprised at all the seemingly innocuous majors that the US Department of Homeland Security considers threatening. I think Geography is on it, because you learn about GIS and global positioning systems, and Geology, because you learn about oil, etc. etc. A lot of international students have not been able to get student visas in the last year or so because immigration rules have become a lot stricter, even stricter than right after 9/11. I understand this is done to protect the United States from people who mean it harm. However, being an international person in the US, and being white, female, from a "friendly" Western country, and in a non-black listed major, I can't even imagine how bad it must be for people who are different from me, because even for me, who fits none of the "dangerous" categories (the article lists China, Cuba, India, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Libya, North Korea, Pakistan, Russia, Sudan, and Syria as affected countries, but not Saudi Arabia), visa procedures have become even more invasive, slower, and sometimes, frankly, offensive. Apart from the fact that US universities make a lot of money off international students, requiring export visas of students just so that they can participate in regular class activities (like looking through a microscope!) is just horrible, horrible, horrible. I would like to encourage all of you to submit comments to the Department of Commerce - especially those who once replied to our AoIR survey they would not want to come to the US for a conference anymore because of the airport fingerprinting. The article doesn't explain how to go about sending comments or where. I searched the Department of Commerce website and found the original notice (from March 28, 2005) here: http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2005/05-6057.htm Here is an excerpt on how to submit comments: <Quote> Follow the instructions for submitting comments. E-mail: scook@bis.doc.gov. Include ``RIN 0694-AD29'' in the subject line of the message. Fax: (202) 482-3355. Mail or Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security, Regulatory Policy Division, 14th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 2705, Washington, DC 20230, ATTN: RIN 0694-AD29. <Endquote> Here is the closing paragraph from the article referred to in the original message. I think it's pretty telling: Quote: While Gupta is already considering a new career path, [Rachel] Claus warns that rules like these have been dangerous in the past. "When the Third Reich was emerging, they said that only Germans of pure Aryan descent could attend German universities. Significant numbers of German scholars departed," she says. "That was detrimental for Germany, but was glorious for the U.S. "We got Einstein." http://www.sfweekly.com/issues/2005-05-18/news/feature.html?src=default_rss Ulla
participants (2)
-
Miraj Khaled -
Ulla Bunz