Hi AoIR folk, Today I was talking about internet language with my advisor, who does disability work and thus has worked with speech-to-text/dictation systems like Dragon Naturally Speaking, and I was explaining about the visual and linguistic playfulness of 1337/hacker speak, and she asked if there was any information yet on the impact of dictation systems on the way language was being used online. I don't know, so I defer to the list: does anyone know if the characteristic errors of speech-to-text programs are making their way into the online language landscape as more heavy computer users develop typing injuries, or if it's too soon to tell? Anyone have any predictions? There was a list specifically for computer-mediated communication that I think might be called CMCSLING or something, which I'm on but can't find the address of: could someone cross-post this over there? thanks, kathy -- . . . connection in an isolating age . . . Katherine Mancuso, graduate student, Emory University Web 2.0 research, life, and meta: http://museumfreak.livejournal.com http://del.icio.us/museumfreak "Whenever anyone says 'You are,' they mean 'I want you to be.'" --Anais Nin