Re: Company vs. Community (Andrew Perrin)
I wonder is "community" is not a term of convenience, like the word "system". I suspect that I use the term "community" to distinguish a social group as an object of discussion or analysis, differentiating it from the background society. I suspect like "system", the designation is effective if the communication within the community is stronger than the communication across the community frontier. Companies, of course, are formal organizations, where someone (else) has gone to the effort of designating the frontiers and formalizing some of the institutional relationships. Except I work with developing countries in which lots of companies are not formal companies.
I'd agree with John that _community_ can be used in the way he describes. I think I do this myself. However, that is not how the vast majority of social scientists have explicitly defined the term, and that's mostly because they've bought into the notion that organizations, etc. are essentially monoliths (albeit perhaps with rough edges). And those who didn't mean to suggest such have still used this usual definition of the term, thereby creating confusion at best. I that John's definition, and particularly the citations I mentioned earlier, would lead us to argue that organizations, etc. (formal or otherwise) are phenomena whose existence and nature that do not exist apart from perception and are perceived due to certain discursive practices. Formal organizations are no more or less than things we perceive due to discursive practices that are somewhat different than those which lead us to perceptions of the existence of an informal organization (e.g., the creation and use of documents of particular kinds, etc.). Further, these practices cannot be specified in advance given the uniqueness of discourse contexts and the reciprocally indexical relationship between discursive practices and contexts. --Christian Nelson John Daly wrote:
I wonder is "community" is not a term of convenience, like the word "system". I suspect that I use the term "community" to distinguish a social group as an object of discussion or analysis, differentiating it from the background society. I suspect like "system", the designation is effective if the communication within the community is stronger than the communication across the community frontier.
Companies, of course, are formal organizations, where someone (else) has gone to the effort of designating the frontiers and formalizing some of the institutional relationships. Except I work with developing countries in which lots of companies are not formal companies.
_______________________________________________ Air-l mailing list Air-l@aoir.org http://www.aoir.org/mailman/listinfo/air-l
-- NetscapeCommunicator4.73Win3220000502
participants (2)
-
Christian Nelson -
John Daly