At 22:29 Uhr +0000 13.2.2007, Alexis Turner wrote:
Did you perchance read the link I supplied before, in which I outlined what I thought the difference between 1.0 and 2.0 was? Mind you, it was a short thought piece, but if it really sucked so badly that you can't tell what I think the difference is and/or if you disagree with my assessment, let me know and I'll consider revising it.
Full source: http://redheadedstepchild.org/destruct/?page=001753 Cliff's notes: creative search and navigation capability -Alexis
You there write: "The incredible thing is that it offers a radically new approach to managing and finding information. Web 2.0 offers both information and tools, if you will, where Web 1.0 offered only information. Methods like XML, RSS, AJAX, and tagging, sites like del.icio.us or netvibes - these offer methods more powerful than search engines and hyperlinks for understanding, and finding, how information is connected. They improve the ambient findability of relevant material, communities, peers, and ideas." So, wouldn't this mean that "Web 2.0" started with Google search? Or ... wait... it started with Yahoo catalogues. No ... wait ... it started with Netscape inventing Livescript (now Javascript). No, hey, it must have started with the implementation of Web *forms*. Uh oh, and soon we are in TBL's office in Geneva looking at the first Web browser... --u