On Sep 3, 2007, at 7:36 AM, Lois Ann Scheidt wrote:
So here is my question, how is a researcher more dangerous to online content producers in publicly accessible websites than any other viewer/reader who has access to their words/multi-media presentations/etc?
To make that a less complex sentence, how are researchers more dangerous to their online subjects than any other person who might access their publicly available site?
Researchers may well do more than merely accessing the information; they may interpret it, label it, repackage it, and redistribute it in ways that can damage the privacy/reputation, etc. of the poster. It's one thing for me to write "I drink a little" (or some such thing) up on a blog for the world to see. It's another if/when a researcher takes that bit then turns it around and republishes it in a piece called "irresponsible drinking and the internet: the double addiction whammy." If my comment (the data that I provided, without informed consent, to the researcher doing research) can be tracked to me, the way that the researcher uses the data can hurt me worse than did my original presentation of it. Edward Lee Lamoureux, Ph. D. Associate Professor, Multimedia Program and Department of Communication Co-Director, New Media Center 1501 W. Bradley Bradley University Peoria IL 61625 309-677-2378 <http://slane.bradley.edu/com/faculty/lamoureux/website2/index.html> <http://gcc.bradley.edu/mm/> AIM/IM & skype: dredleelam Second Life: Professor Beliveau