Hi everyone, I've been following this discussion and also have a few comments. I'm going to quote from various comments, just to raise some points of clarification. The issue of technology has been raised a lot in the previous e-mails. So here's my question: for word processing, Internet, and basic educational tools, do you actually need a high end laptop? No. Why spend $1000 on laptops or desktop computers when you can build a cheaper model that gets the job done, and offer it at a lower price? "Apparently when Linux was used in Africa... vast amount of time configuring and learning to use the systems was required so users gave up and went to windows." I run an organization (http://www.fiveminutestomidnight.org) and we have Linux projects in Africa. The difference between the $100 laptop and Linux is that the $100 laptop isn't meant to be upgraded or have new software installed... Thus, you just got rid of most of the complex technical issues related to running Linux. Running OpenOffice or FireFox in Linux is easy. "While the production plan is pretty clear. there are no, and i mean this very clearly, no plans to educate people on how to use this system." This is why children are being targeted. If you listen to Negroponte's MIT speech (http://mitworld.mit.edu/video/313/), he addresses this directly. Also, if you visit developing nations that have cyber cafes (any city, really), you'll notice that a large portion of the youth already know how to use instant messengers, e-mail, and basic office tools. The idea of targeting children is that they can experiment and do more independent learning. Sure, this misses people at the lowest level of the socioeconomic ladder, who've never used computers and who don't have the ability to attend school, but you have to start somewhere. "My theory is that the majority of these will be destroyed or repurposed in a few years. I look at the case and see that it can keep rain off my head, or used as a shovel,or otherwise used effectively to improve a persons life."
From laptop pilots in the past (including Negroponte's), it's been shown that such laptops are beneficial because households can use them to have light during the night, when electricity is out. People have been doing this, and it makes the entire family value the laptop (and its functioning state :) ). One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) has no problem with such alternative uses, from what I've heard.
Thanks, Wojciech -- Five Minutes to Midnight: Youth on human rights and current affairs http://www.fiveminutestomidnight.org/