Dear colleagues, Maybe you are interested in this congress, the University of Zaragoza (Spain) http://cicid.es/simposios/simposio18/ Greetings, Alexandra Mª Sandulescu Budea Ciencias de la Comunicación y Sociología Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Campus de Madrid, España Teléfono: 914887849 alexandra.sandulescu@urjc.es<mailto:email@urjc.es> | www.urjc.es<http://www.urjc.es/> | @URJC | ________________________________ De: Air-L <air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org> en nombre de Williams, Betsy A - (betsyw) <betsyw@email.arizona.edu> Enviado: sábado, 2 de septiembre de 2017 0:29:54 Para: Julie Cohen; air-l Asunto: Re: [Air-L] quick research question re social media news feeds Dear Julie, I hope others respond with work on how a news feed format specifically changes perceptions of news. A related literature, mostly from psychology, is reviewed in the following paper: Paul, C., & Matthews, M. (2016). The Russian "Firehose of Falsehood" Propaganda Model: Why It Might Work and Options to Counter It (Perspectives No. PE-198-OSD). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE198.html In the most relevant section to your interest, on page 6, they mention that information overload affects how people judge credibility. They give several examples: -The "sleeper effect" is where people forget their initial credibility qualms and/or forget the source of particular information, allowing the feelings of truth to remain. -Retractions are rarely effective at countering the initial information. -Knowing that a source might contain misinformation does not give people good ability to judge which information is accurate. They include these citations for those points: Miriam J. Metzger and Andrew J. Flanagin, "Credibility and Trust of Information in Online Environments: The Use of Cognitive Heuristics," Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 59, Part B, December 2013. Pornpitakpan, Chanthika, "The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence," Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 2, February 2004, pp. 243-281. Henkel, Linda A., and Mark E. Mattson, "Reading Is Believing: The Truth Effect and Source Credibility," Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 20, No. 4, December 2011, pp. 1705-1721. Lewandowsky, Stephan, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Colleen M. Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, and John Cook, "Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing," Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol. 13, No. 3, December 2012, pp. 106-131. Ecker, Ullrich K. H., Stephan Lewandowsky, Olivia Fenton, and Kelsey Martin, "Do People Keep Believing Because They Want to? Preexisting Attitudes and Continued Influence of Misinformation," Memory and Cognition, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2014, pp. 292-304. On page 3, they also discuss social cues that improve credibility, citing the following: Pornpitakpan, Chanthika, "The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence," Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 2, February 2004, pp. 243-281. Hughes, Michael G., Jennifer A. Griffith, Thomas A. Zeni, Matthew L. Arsenault, Olivia D. Copper, Genevieve Johnson, Jay H. Hardy, Shane Connelly, and Michael D. Mumford, "Discrediting in a Message Board Forum: The Effects of Social Support and Attacks on Expertise and Trustworthiness," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 19, No. 3, April 2014, pp. 325-341. Flanagin, Andrew J., and Miriam J. Metzger, "The Role of Site Features, User Attributes, and Information Verification Behaviors on the Perceived Credibility of Web-Based Information," New Media and Society, Vol. 9, No. 2, April 2007, pp. 319-342. Based on this background, I can only imagine that it is extremely difficult for people to learn only reliable information from a newsfeed. After all, people are bad at remembering sources for information even when they are not all mixed together, and the branding by the platform and possible recommendations from personal connections are very likely to induce trust in whatever is presented. I would love to see what experiments or other research has been done specific to news feeds. Hope this helps. Betsy -- Betsy Williams, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Research Associate Center for Digital Society and Data Studies University of Arizona School of Information -----Original Message----- From: Air-L [mailto:air-l-bounces@listserv.aoir.org] On Behalf Of Julie Cohen Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 8:27 AM To: air-l <air-l-aoir.org@listserv.aoir.org> Subject: [Air-L] quick research question re social media news feeds Dear all - I have a vague memory of seeing some work that had been done on whether/how the news feed shapes/flattens communicative and/or epistemological hierarchies. E.g., updates from news sources of record are mixed in with other updates and there is less of the contextual information that would distinguish one set of updates as being more factual, more authoritative, etc. I can't remember much else about this, but if this rings any bells, I'd very much appreciate a pointer in the right direction. Many thanks. Julie Julie E. Cohen Mark Claster Mamolen Professor of Law and Technology Georgetown Law http://www.juliecohen.com/ _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/ _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/