and the remaining 22 are inconclusive about who actually is blogging, but according to content, probably break down like this:
By content, do you mean subject matter rather than linguistic factors - as discussed briefly at http://www.nature.com/nsu/nsu_pf/030714/030714-13.html? It would be interesting to compare 'apparent' gender as implied by content with linguistic gender (for want of a better expression), given the discussions earlier on this list about hiding or creating identities online.
8 by men 1 by a woman 6 by a collective (almost exclusively men) 1 by a common variety garden gnome (a "kabouter"), probably a female one 1 is a fake weblog redirecting to a pr0n site 3 are really hard to classify and 1 appears to actually be written by a dog, giving a whole new meaning to that New Yorker cartoon, 'On the internet nobody knows your a dog.'
Lol! Rowin Cross Research Fellow, University of Strathclyde