Here are the papers: - Reshares https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.add8424 - Chronofeed: https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.abp9364 - Segregation: https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.ade7138 - Like-minded: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06297-w All of the datasets are here: https://socialmediaarchive.org/search?cc=US2020&ln=en&c=US2020 On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 4:41 PM Joly MacFie via Air-L < air-l@listserv.aoir.org> wrote:
From POLITICO's Digital Future Daily <https://www.politico.com/newsletters/digital-future-daily>
The article does not link to the studies. Maybe someone could provide?
<snip>
The studies released Thursday tried to tease out the influence of particular factors, such as Facebook's algorithm for serving up content to users. Two studies published in the journal Science that examined the effects of Facebook’s algorithm and reshare feature during the fall of 2020 found that both features increased user engagement — but neither affected people's existing political attitudes or polarization.
A separate study published in the journal Nature found that reducing users’ exposure to sources that echo their existing beliefs didn't affect their political attitudes either.
Meta trumpeted the results in a memo circulated ahead of the studies’ release: “Despite the common assertions that social media is ‘destroying democracy,’” the company wrote, “the evidence in these and many other studies shows something very different.”
Social media critics — many of whom have spent years sounding the alarm about the ways it has changed American politics — suggested the studies were too limited, and too close to Meta itself, to be persuasive, including Frances Haugen, the former Facebook executive who leaked internal company files in 2021, and Jesse Lehrich, co-founder of Accountable Tech, an advocacy group focused on information controls for social media.
A fourth study, also published in Science, found that a cluster of news sources consumed by conservatives produced most of the misinformation flagged by the platform’s third-party fact-checking system. (A study co-author, Sandra González-Bailón of the University of Pennsylvania, declined to provide a list of those sources.)
The studies were the result of a collaboration between Meta and 17 outside researchers from universities including Northeastern, Stanford and Princeton.
An independent rapporteur tasked with evaluating the collaboration vouched for the soundness of its results, but said its framework gave Meta influence over the ways in which outside researchers evaluated its platforms.
“Meta set the agenda in ways that affected the overall independence of the researchers,” wrote Michael Wagner, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s School of Journalism and Mass Communication.
</snip>
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/07/27/meta-partisanship-00108553
-- -------------------------------------- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -------------------------------------- - _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- Libby Hemphill pronouns: she/her/hers Director, Resource Center for Minority Data <http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/RCMD>, ICPSR <http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/> Director, Social Media Archive <http://socialmediaarchive.org/>, ICPSR <http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/> Associate Director, Center for Social Media Responsibility <http://csmr.umich.edu/> Research Associate Professor, Institute for Social Research <http://home.isr.umich.edu/> Associate Professor, School of Information <https://www.si.umich.edu/> University of Michigan