There's one thing I've seen students do with laptops and wi-fi in a class that convinced me to not impose any kind of outright class-wide ban on using the technology, and that's IM-ing between one another in a situation where one student was more fluent in English than the other and would translate things for the less fluent student. I've often wondered what it would be like if I provided students with a back-channel via IRC for the class (and what would it be like if I projected the channel on a screen in front of the class)? What would students do with this (if anything)? If I had to make a binary decision I'd probably do it on a class by class basis, and try to take into consideration any number of things such as course content, the types of learning I'm encouraging most, the emphases I seek on particular forms of engaging the class, and the students themselves (among other things). What's been interesting to me is the reaction of students to teachers who are themselves looking at screens and not at the class. In general they seem quite put off by apparently not getting the attention of the teacher (even when it's not personal attention, directed at them individually, but attention to the class). Sj On May 18, 2007, at 8:36 AM, Julie Cohen wrote:
A colleague of mine recently published this op-ed in the Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/06/ AR200704 0601544.html
He describes his reasons for banning his first-year students from bringing laptops to class (they go into "stenographic mode", or they surf and check e-mail, which distracts other students and detracts from the learning experience). He reports that his students reacted positively to the experiment (some of my own reacted quite negatively when I mentioned they idea, but they were upper-years who had self-selected to study IP/technology law). He has also begun campaigning to have us modify our wireless network so that it is turned "off" in classrooms during class time and/or to modify our entire network to disable students' university e-mail and web accounts during the hours that they're listed as being signed up for class. I was surprised to learn this, but apparently the U. of Michigan law school has done both of these things and some other law schools are considering it.
In the ensuing debate, many colleagues cited what I think are some very good reasons not to do the last two things, including: missed pedagogical opportunities (both re use of the Internet for on-the-fly research as subjects come up in class and re ethics of networked technology use), cost, inequality as between students who use only our network and students who can access other available wireless networks via commercial accounts, and excessive paternalism.
Now that the semester has ended, I expect the subject to come up again, and I thought I would see what members of this list think. Most specifically, I'm wondering (1) what you all say to colleagues who react to laptops and wired classrooms in this way; and (2) techniques that you use to encourage students to think about their own responsibilities re networked technology usage.
Thanks, Julie
_______________________________________________ The air-l@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http:// listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/