Friends,
In point 4 of Nancy's proposal for a data repository there is this statement: "Our intention is that access to such private resources contributed by aoir members would be limited to aoir members." I see no reasonable justification for restricting access and would not participate in the venture if such restrictions are adopted.
My assumption was that people would prefer to limit the access to their data, otherwise it would fall under that first category of data already available on the web. Personally, if I were going to make data I'd collected available, I'd like to know that there was a limited set of people who would have access to that, and that I could get that list on the member website. However, the level of access is certainly open for discussion and I'd be inclined to defer to the will of the people who were willing to share their data through a resource like this. If they want it available to all, then that's fine. The issue of how much of what aoir does under its auspices should be available to all and how much should be available only to members is a tricky one and there are arguments on both sides. It's a matter of ongoing discussion with every idea we come up with. Speaking only for myself, my train of logic goes like this --> do we distinguish between members and nonmembers? if we don't what does membership mean? if membership doesn't mean anything then why join? if no one joins there's no budget, eventually no conferences, eventually no association. While I believe that aoir should not be an exclusive little clique, I do think it's important to provide benefits for members that are better than the benefits of not being a member. It's not like membership is hard to come by. Regarding metadata, I concur with Jeremy. If we're talking about data that are incomprehensible without being in on the research program or that needs a lot of sophisticated metastuff that's more than a codebook and explanation could provide, then it's probably not appropriate for this. On the other hand, there is a lot of data available already on the web that's being used just like this (e.g. Pew's data). Regarding whether this is too big to be sustained by volunteers, maybe a volunteer effort can't sustain this. If this is not something people would find adequately valuable to participate in, then it won't work. On the other hand, all of AoIR thus far would seem to be a lot more than a volunteer effort could sustain, and it seems to be working pretty well because people have cared enough to volunteer their energies. Nancy _________________________________________________________ Nancy Baym nbaym@ku.edu http://www.ku.edu/home/nbaym Communication Studies, University of Kansas 102 Bailey, 1440 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence, KS 66045, USA VP, Association of Internet Researchers: http://aoir.org