1 Apr
2007
1 Apr
'07
3 a.m.
all I'm requesting is that you provide some evidence that the ontological commitments that you assert exist and are not commitments based on convention, possibly as style or fashion. either you can, or you can't. if you can't, then your assertions are merely your own, perfectly fine for what they are, but not really capable of sustaining a broader position. On Mar 31, 2007, at 10:56 PM, James Whyte wrote:
Very weak!