17 Dec
2007
17 Dec
'07
5:53 p.m.
The UPI version is much more problematic. The reporter suggests that danah boyd's critics are correct, and casts all the SNS research as worthless. Quite an unfair synopsis. --Christian Nelson On Dec 17, 2007, at 12:12 PM, Michael Zimmer wrote:
What's worse than a poorly researched and skewed WP article? The UPI crib-note version, of course:
<http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Quirks/2007/12/16/ majoring_in_facebook_at_uc_berkely/4780/>
Yikes.
-mz