I'm somewhat conflicted about this. While I'm generally glad to see fair use expanded, I think the judge misunderstood Google's business model when citing in favor of fair use that Google "does not sell the scans". They clearly wouldn't do it if they were not convinced that making these books searchable is adding to their bottom-line by refining user profiles. Felix On 11/14/2013 06:39 PM, Dan L. Burk wrote:
I am so, so happy about this. Big win for the Free Culture movement.
I am not sure I would go that far. You still end up a very significant body of human knowledge controlled by a not-necessarily-benign corporation with a tendency toward information monopoly.
But Judge Chin's decision is the right one, and puts us on a much better road than the alternative.
DLB
-- ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| http://felix.openflows.com |OPEN PGP: 056C E7D3 9B25 CAE1 336D 6D2F 0BBB 5B95 0C9F F2AC