Hi all, Apologies for a slightly irritated posting/inquiry - but I've discovered that FB recently removed a comment from my timeline that I made regarding events in Ferguson, Missouri, and Anonymous, which not only "doxed" the alleged shooter, but also cut off Internet services within the local police department. (Going on memory here, sorry if all the details are not exact or complete.) My comment was something along the lines of: The is the second time I've seen Anonymous out the wrong person (and I'm not even keeping track very closely). As unhappy as I am with corrupt and over-militarized cops, etc. [really: my wife grew up some 15 minutes' walk from where the shooting took place] - I'm even less happy with a hacker underground that is neither transparent nor accountable to those of us it claims to "protect and serve" (irony intentional). I'm assuming it was FB that took this down, for whatever reason (i.e., not someone from Anonymous or elsewhere)? In any event: does anyone know of good studies - qualitative / quantitative - that attempt to document this sort of behavior on FB's part? It would be invaluable both for its own sake, as well as for my upcoming class on Internet regulation as caught between several poles, including freedom of expression as critical to democratic discourse, etc. Many thanks in advance, - charles ess