i'm also interested in learning more about what people have in mind. I've been working on free access systems for some time, and it ends up, as it usually does, that to get anything really going you need a critical mass, which usually comes together around an issue. for medical researchers, the issue was the combined problem that a single journal can cost well over 10k/year, which brought about pub-med, which was government sponsored, but funding was killed, leaving people which caused the opening of pub-med. in the social sciences and economics the problems were different, but certain groups congealed because of the period of time it takes to review/publish, editorial control not publishing accepted subdisciplines, and the like, but to me it seems a less cohesive movement than medicine has... On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 06:23 AM, david silver wrote:
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Art McGee wrote:
[Internet and Cyberspace Research is next on the hit list <evil grin goes here>.--Art]
what kind of ideas do you, art, and others have in mind to make this happen? david
_______________________________________________ Air-l mailing list Air-l@aoir.org http://www.aoir.org/mailman/listinfo/air-l
Jeremy Hunsinger Center for Digital Discourse and Culture () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail /\ - against microsoft attachments