Holloway and Valentine are referring to gender in the ideological or performative sense - gender being seen as something you accomplish socially rather than some inherent quality about you. Hence the 'doing' a gender rather than, say, 'being' a gender. It cuts the assumption that one's phenotypal sex (physiology, hormones, chromosomes) is tied directly to one's gender identity. That was oversimplified as anything, but hopefully it helped? Joshua Joshua Raclaw Dept of Linguistics University of Colorado Quoting Andy Roberts <aroberts@gmail.com>: * On 28/02/06, Sue Cranmer <sue@jcranmer.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: * > Also, there's a useful chapter which touches on this in * > Cyberkids - Sarah Holloway and Gill Valentine, specifically about how young * > girls may perform gender by positioning themselves as being for/against * > internet use (if my memory serves). I've seen this in my own research too. * * Please could you explain what is meant in this context by 'perform gender' ? * _______________________________________________ * The air-l@listserv.aoir.org mailing list * is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org * Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: * http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org * * Join the Association of Internet Researchers: * http://www.aoir.org/ *