Maria- U.S. copyright says, basically, once the expression is fixed--once they've typed out and posted their words, for example--copyright is granted. So, generally, the posters would own the copyright to their posts. However, this general statement is complicated by the use of certain software. Facebook, for example, claims ownership and hence (I'd think) copyright for everything posted. I think you should address copyright like this: 1)Check the software/organization to see what their policies are concerning copyright and use of their material for research purposes. In general, I think you'll find that most of these organizations own copyright but will let the material be used for research. 2)If that is so, then it's a good idea to check with the original poster to get permission to use their comments (as you've done). If you get their permission, particularly in email/ writing, then I think you're covered on the copyright front. Of course, if they deny permission, then you can't use their comments. 3)If the organizations differ from what I've written above (for example, Twitter probably does, as evidenced by the recent discussion on this list), you'll have to proceed on a case by case basis. As far as ethics...I think you should mask both their true identity (actual name) and their user name. But I haven't done too much internet research to date. I would think some standards have developed by now--how do researchers generally handle this problem? Do people generally create pseudonyms for online pseudonyms? I defer to the other researchers here. -Shannon Oltmann Shannon M. Oltmann Doctoral Candidate Adjunct Instructor Profile: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/spotlight/index.php?facid=108 School of Library & Information Science Indiana University Quoting Radhika Gajjala <radhika@cyberdiva.org>:
Maria - this dilemma persists for every beginning phd project starting with email lists (see my book from 2004 on Cyberselves: Feminist Ethnographies of South Asian women as an example from another generation)
My 2 cents -
copyright - If its public - they dont have a law suit case - besides you also got actual email permissions from them as well.
Ethics - if its sensitive material - dont reveal their real of youtube account names?
share your dissertation with them?
- but let's see what others have to say:)
Finish your project - then worry about this as you get nearer to publication.
r
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Maria Eronen <m85327@student.uwasa.fi>wrote:
Dear all,
I am Maria, a PhD student from Finland and currently working with my thesis concerning how celebrity gossip leads to moral discussion on the Internet. I think I have some problems with research ethics. My research material consists of publicly available discussions from YouTube, various online newspapers and celebrity-related forums. Because I'm conducting linguistic analysis, it is reasonable to cite comments from those online discussions.
One central topic I am focusing on is autobiographical moralizing (for example, discussion participants compare violence involving celebrities with their own-life experiences of violence, such as telling how their partner once hit them). This kind of material is what I categorize as sensitive and see it better not to refer to pseudonyms or usernames. I make it clear in my work that in some cases I see it better to stress privacy protection over copyright. However, I will mention the forum, where the comments come from, as a source (such as YouTube). I have personally contacted every one whose comments I see as sensitive. I want to use even senstive comments because they are valuable material from the point of view of the research. No one of them whom I contacted has said no. But of course, I'm not even sure whether they have seen the posts I sent to them (actually one replied to me and just wanted to know more about the study).
In order to protect myself, I have not copied the whole comments, but left some parts of them out of the publication. The problem is now that by letting them know such a research they might see their posts in the dissertation and start a law case (because I don't authorize their words). The comments I cite without referring to the users as authors do not seem as pieces of creative art, but they are typical examples of online discussion.
However, I'm a bit concerned because the posters whom I cite without permission, are American. The work itself will be published in Finland.
Do you think this kind of privacy protection is a good reason to leave the usernames out? Am I too concerned or could this lead to serious consequences? Has anyone had similar experiences?
I would be very thankful if you had time to help me,
all the best, Maria Eronen
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- Radhika Gajjala Director, American Culture Studies Professor of Communication Studies and Cultural Studies 101 East Hall Bowling Green State University Bowling Green, OH 43403
http://personal.bgsu.edu/~radhik _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/