Anders, I thought your take on citation styles was interesting and it prompted a (slightly rant-y) response: I've been thinking about bibliographic/citation styles lately as well and I ended up preferring APA style for two main reasons: MLA style is based on the premise that written scholarship is immutable and timeless (this comes from the literary studies tradition) and that the author (assuredly in the Foucauldian sense) is more important than the context (cultural, temporal) in which the work was published. APA privileges that timeliness of the work, and generally is more usable for citing online references. For unpaginated online material, for instance, counting paragraphs makes far less sense than using the find or search function of the browser (MLA does not take into account the actual differences in print and digital interfaces to texts). I don't see myself counting paragraphs so I can say that, for instance for a lengthy online document, the quote appears in paragraph 71. Does the reader then have to count the paragraphs to get to the quote if they he or she goes to the source? MLA bases its style on print publication models and does not bother to try to understand that digital models are *different* (this is the problem I have with the MLA in general, as well as most writing handbooks, composition textbooks, and instructional materials that try to approach digital works as if they are really the same as print works, just accessible online). Doug Anders Fagerjord wrote:
Den 20. okt. 2006 kl. 16.13 skrev Joseph Reagle:
First, most of the primary sources are online, and have only been online. Quotations from e-mail and most exclusively online resources have no page numbers associated with them.
The MLA style (http://www.mla.org/style) suggests that for unpaginated material, you state the paragraph number, counted from top.
Styles are a matter of academic discipline, and something often not under your control. I tend to prefer MLA as it not only has specified how to cite almost all kinds of communication, but also because it avoids the necessity for year-and-letter constructions (2004a), and you stay clear of obviously anachronic constructions like "_Rhetoric_ (Aristotle, 1989)."
--anders
-- Anders Fagerjord, dr. art. Associate professor,
Department of Media and Communcation, Unversity of Oslo P.O. Box 1093 Blindern N-0317 OSLO Norway
http://www.media.uio.no http://fagerjord.no
_______________________________________________ The air-l@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/