12 Feb
2005
12 Feb
'05
10:49 p.m.
Therefore, I have a question. Is it possible/practical to have a mega-panel or should we break in up into two panels (part 1 and part 2)? I have seen this done at other conferences but didn't know how it was engineered (either by the PP or the submitters). I didn't want one panel to get rejected just because another one on the same topic is seen as redundant.
Alex Halavais did this for blog presentations a couple of years ago - and did a fantastic job, I have to say. It worked out pretty well. Sounds like you are a de-facto "point person" for coordinating your responses :)