Solutions are easier said than done. Here goes the said iterations for whatever it's worth: The publications driven academic learning industry is going to transition and rise above it's current two dimensional academic flat lands and move toward a three dimensional emotional economy of scale where the fruits of data will be directly shared with the bottom of the pyramid, the so called research participants (very much the entire global population) who will be eventually entitled to the return on their data investment that involves privacy tradeoffs and essentially being used as a product. This video illustrates the above process at it's end: https://youtu.be/ONDSeZjskrk?si=9m5rGMO-6rMUQPAJ Data collection will involve Orwellian devices, the ideal kind and not dystopian as conjured originally by Orwell that will involve ambient AI with a mix of robotics, check out this recent release from Stanford and to quote with generalizeable edits: "Mimicking human cognition via a dual-system architecture, this technology demonstrates superior reasoning on benchmarks and autonomously executes complex research. To extend this intelligence physically, the system simulates human trouble shooting procedures as a physics-aware model to foresee adverse events. Generating and validating on the previous benchmark, the tech exhibits spatial intelligence for reasoning and action. Crucially, we demonstrate that this platform democratizes expertise and narrows the performance gap between junior and senior human trouble shooters. The tech transforms human trouble shooting interventions towards a collaborative discipline where human intuition and machine intelligence co-evolve." Unquoted from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.02.18.26345936v1.full-text More about "trouble shooting humans" here: https://userdrivenhealthcare.blogspot.com/2025/04/book-proposal-introduction... More about "emotional economies at scale" here: https://userdrivenhealthcare.blogspot.com/2025/12/udlco-projr-role-of-human-... More about Orwellian devices here: https://userdrivenhealthcare.blogspot.com/2025/07/user-driven-orwellian-eyes... best, rb On Wed, 11 Mar 2026, 06:31 Christian Fuchs via Air-L, < air-l@listserv.aoir.org> wrote:
Hello, AI-generated papers are a real problem as it can be no coincidence that within a year many journals have seen a multiplication of the number of submissions... It makes the whole academic publishing process more difficult than it is already. And papermill factories have already made a capitalist process out of AI-generated papers, even creating fake reviewer email addresses of people actually exisitng that are suggested as potential reviewers, etc. I feaer there is no easy solution... Any ideas? Best Chrisitan
Am 10.03.26 um 03:36 schrieb Rakesh Biswas via Air-L:
AI co-authors would automatically beget AI co-editors and AI peer reviewers.
Perhaps it's time for every human to experience being the last human "editor in chief" before they are edited out and written off from their academic flat lands!
Either way in our regular data collection and raw blog publications (peer reviewed by our own large number of global team members), we have come to terms with the fact that the humungous human TLDR data we generate daily is largely fit for AI consumption and currently not fit for most humans who are not a part of our participatory action research in real time!
best,
rb
On Tue, 10 Mar 2026, 07:43 Christopher Lueg via Air-L, < air-l@listserv.aoir.org> wrote:
I would also be interested in helping keep FM alive.
The crazy increase in submissions and the associated scarcity of reviewers is a challenge that all journals have been dealing with but now we face an incoming avalanche of AI (co-)generated papers that exceed even the capacity of editors that have substantial institutional support.
"Perhaps FM - the Sequel" could become a testbed for a different submission model!? Happy to share a few ideas.
Best, Christopher
Dr. sc.nat. Christopher P. Lueg Professor, School of Information Sciences University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign https://ischool.illinois.edu/people/christopher-lueg https://www.linkedin.com/in/clueg/ cplueg@illinois.edu
On Sun, Feb 8, 2026 at 5:36 AM Ruth Tsuria via Air-L < air-l@listserv.aoir.org> wrote:
Would be happy to volunteer as well, and have experience acting as an Editor-in-Chief
Associate Professor, Department of Communication, Media, and the Arts Program Director, MA Communication and MS Professional Communication and Digital Media Arts College of Human Development, Culture, Media Seton Hall University, NJ, USA
Keeping Women in Their Digital Place (2024, Penn State University Press)
Editor-in-Chief, Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture (Brill)
For more publications: https://works.bepress.com/ruth-tsuria/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/