24 May
2006
24 May
'06
2:37 p.m.
On Monday 22 May 2006 23:26, Michael Zimmer wrote:
Or, is it acceptable just to footnote the URL and leave it at that?
Mine are out of control! :) For example, in [1] all primary sources are online and there are 9 WP page references: all within 2004-2006 range. So it can be hard to distinguish what is what. In the actual in-line citations I distinguish by appending the first letter of the first 3 words. For example: (Wikipedia 2004n) -> Wikipedia (2004). Nupedia. Retrieved on December 22, 2005 from < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nupedia >. In the dissertation, I might separate the bibliographies of primary and secondary sources... [1] http://reagle.org/joseph/2005/ethno/leadership.html