In my first year cultural studies course I give students a turnitin report of a paper I wrote for the purpose that has a range of citation errors and a number of correctly cited quotes. In small groups they go through the report, decide which 'matches' are ok, and which are citation errors that need to be fixed. They add references, quotation marks, paraphrase, etc as required. We discuss what the various groups have done, and they are encouraged to go through their own reports before final submission of the papers. Turnitin is set up to allow submission for a week or two before the due date, and for students to see their own reports immediately. I think where Turnitin is solely used as a detection tool, there is a tendency to look just at the percentage of matching text - but I haven't found that particularly useful. I think you need to examine every instance of matching text to see just why and how it matches. Marj Dr Marjorie Kibby, Senior Lecturer in Communication & Culture Faculty of Education and Arts The University of Newcastle, Callaghan NSW 2308 Australia Marj.Kibby@newcastle.edu.au +61 2 49216604
James Whyte <whyte.james@yahoo.com> 03/10/07 3:34 AM >>>
In that vein, I am not sure that I understand Marjorie's claim that Turnitin is useful for teaching referencing, since no one outside the company knows the matching algorithm -- the criteria for text comparison are unknown, so it is hard for me to see what the students would learn. Perhaps she could say more about that.