David Silver wrote:
What I'd like to see is some critical explorations of this relationship. Whether it exists or not is hardly under question; what it means and what the repercussions are -- now there's the rub.
I know of some theoretical work that critically "explores" some of these issues. I've found Arjun Appaderai's work useful on this issue. See for instance his "Introduction" to __Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization_. Much of this line of thought is built on Mary Douglas and Baron Isherwood's seminal study _The World of Goods_ where the try to move away from notions of consumption as emulation (in the Thorstein Veblen sense of "conspicuous consumption") to consumption as a form of information management. This then allows one to see how contemporary communities use the products of capital to form communities through information exchange. Regarding the functionalism of the definition of "community" by the internal members of the community: Although frustratingly abstract, I find Niklas Luhmann's work on social systems the most elegant probe of this topic. For Luhmann, social systems reproduce themselves by using internal codes to distinguish the "inside" of the social system from the "outside". Thus the identity formation of a community is very much attached to how the community sees itself in an environment and thus implicated in the belief systems held by the community. _Social Systems_ is the magnum opus here, but his _Ecological Communications_ provides a much more manageable introduction to his thought. Also, there is finally a good secondary source on Luhmann in English, William Rasch's _Niklas Luhmann's Modernity: The Paradoxes of Differentiation_. best- Phillip Thurtle Department of Communication Program in the Comparative History of Ideas