Dear Jill and all, Your question reminds me an article published in The Chronicle, in April. Here's the article <http://chronicle.com/article/Confronting-the-Myth-of-the/145949/>. It starts with a description of a similar activity, conducted by Prof. Eszter Hargittai from Northwestern U with her students. In the first lesson she starts with a "gut check", telling the class everything she knows about them, just from online information in the public sphere. Therefore, these things are done and it might be a good idea to ask her advice about the ethical concerns (as far as I understand, she used this "gut check" without letting her students know before that she is going to do so). I myself never had the gut to do it to my students, although I think it is a brilliant idea (but not to a class of 100+ students, which is the case in my situation). Since we are talking about a research conducted by an undergraduate student, with a limited scope, I'd suggest one precaution in addition to previous suggestions: First, the interviews should not be with other people whom the student knows personally. They must be complete strangers to him. The advantage of this precaution, in my view, is that it replicates the conditions of the internet-sphere, where you are well aware that the information is public, but yet still don't have the notion that you are exposing yourself to familiar people. It also prevents awkward situations that the student will reveal something about a person he knows, that might embarrass them both in the situation of the interview. These are my two pennies, Nathan Stolero Instructor and PhD Candidate The Department of Communication Tel Aviv University Israel On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Jill Walker Rettberg < Jill.Walker.Rettberg@lle.uib.no> wrote:
One of our upper-level undergrads would like to write a paper about privacy using a slightly unusual methodology: he wants to find five informants who are willing to let him google them exhaustively in order to find out everything he can about them using legal, public online methods. Then he wants to show each informant the information and interview them, asking things like "did you know this information about you was accessible?" and more in order to find out something about what information people think is available about them, what is actually available about them, and how people feel about all the information out there about them and the possible disconnect between what they think and what is in fact out there.
My gut reaction is that I wouldn't want to let a researcher "stalk" me online like that, and if I wouldn't want to be an informant maybe I shouldn't allow the project, right? But I'm also guessing that the project might be approved by the ethics board so long as there is clear, informed consent. And it'd be interesting to see the results.
But beyond the ethics board: what do you think about a methodology like this? Do you share my gut reaction or am I overreacting? Would you let a student do it? And what might be better ways for a student to do a small scale research project on this topic?
Jill
Jill Walker Rettberg Professor of Digital Culture Dept of Linguistic, Literary and Aesthetic Studies University of Bergen Postboks 7800 5020 Bergen
+ 47 55588431
Blog - http://jilltxt.net Twitter - http://twitter.com/jilltxt
My latest book, Blogging (2nd ed), will be available from Polity from September 20: http://www.politybooks.com/book.asp?ref=0745663648
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/