It would be helpful if you actually make a point. Jeremy Hunsinger <jhuns@vt.edu> wrote: I don't think there are any ontological commitments per se, if you want to construct them, that is fine, but i see diverse usages in technical and non-technical spheres, and I do not see any basis for the claim that there is any frame present for usage beyond fashion or common use. Specifically, other than style guidelines in some domains and presses, I don't think there is any basis to the position you are taking below, but if you can marshal evidence that outside of style-guide determined systems, there is a technical/non-technical split, I would love to see it. I participate in both and I see people migrating back and forth without issue. On Mar 31, 2007, at 3:55 PM, James Whyte wrote:
_______________________________________________ The air-l@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/ --------------------------------- Don't pick lemons. See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.