I am afraid I don't have a good answer, but I will add "me too" to the question, and maybe note that it is important to decide who you mean by "peers." I mention this because your question has come up in two different--but related--contexts for me. The first is in evaluating work that is not in traditional scholarly contexts (i.e., not a book or a journal article) for the purposes of tenure. The second is in reviewing the work of students both in my own program and in the new P2PU School of Webcraft to evaluate their work and determine if it is of professional quality. Would be interested in the responses you receive. Best, Alex On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Tery G <teryg93@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
If you were looking for someone who's qualified to look at a new media package (website, email list, Facebook fan page, etc) and peer review it in terms of how it meets the goals it set out to meet, who might you ask?
I'm looking for articles in this area to see if I can find people writing about it, but I'm not finding them.
Thanks in advance, Tery Griffin _______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
-- -- // // This email is // [x] assumed public and may be blogged / forwarded. // [ ] assumed to be private, please ask before redistributing. // // Alexander C. Halavais, ciberflâneur // http://alex.halavais.net //