Maybe this has already been said, but I find the framing by class problematic on a basic level--we are already focusing only on a certain "level" of class we we look at Facebook and MySpace users. On 6/29/07, Lois Ann Scheidt <lscheidt@indiana.edu> wrote: "Will the divide hold true now that Facebook allows access to anyone with an email address?" Yes, anyone with an e-mail can have access, but remember that only a certain "level" of class has an e-mail, and has/feels the desire to devote time to play via Facebook and MySpace. (Lois, pardon my lifting of your quote. I know that it was not pertinent for your discussion. It seemed like a good jumping off point for my thoughts.) I'm not statistically sure of this, but I would imagine that there are class distinctions (more inclusive, maybe) between cell phone users (more lower socio-economic groups included) and webpage users. This may seem like a trite over already explored discussion of class and the internet, but I think it still needs to frame the overall discussion of class. That's why Bourdieu's discussion of class and distinction might bear some fruit. Facebook and MySpace class differences are more like differences within a class grouping that already exist "above" other socio-economic distinctions. Again, maybe this is plain to see, but it is worhy of acknowledging if we want to untangle class on the internet. -robert