great questions, and i'll be eager to see responses - but can't resist commenting on: On 3/19/11 12:36 PM, "Petr Lupac" <petr.lupac@gmail.com> wrote:
Or is it just using the new, theoretically disembedded term so they can defend themselves by broad scope of interpretation possibilities?
Both as a cynic (in the popular sense) and something of a philosopher - is there such a thing as a theoretically disembedded term? I'm not trying to be snide here - but just genuinely curious. Thanks! - charles ess Institut for Informations- og Medievidenskab Helsingforsgade 14 8200 Aarhus N. Denmark mail: <imvce@hum.au.dk> tel: (+45) 8942 9250 Professor, Philosophy and Religion Drury University, Springfield, Missouri 65802 USA Exemplary persons seek harmony, not sameness. -- Analects 13.23