Hi all, While I'd like to thank the reviewers for their positive comments and useful suggestions, I need to correct an impression of one reviewer who believed that giving the names of roundtable participants was a breach of anonymity guidelines, and who named two of the panel participants saying they "should have known better". While a prepared paper should stand or fall on its own merits, and should therefore be anonymous, the success or failure of a roundtable discussion depends on the participants having the knowledge and experience to respond to issues raised by the audience. Knowing the participants in a round table is essential in judging its potential, and their details were requested in the guidelines. No-one, including the individuals named by the reviewer, did anything improper in this submission. Regards, Marj Associate Professor Marjorie Kibby Discipline Convenor: Film, Media and Cultural Studies School of Humanities and Social Science The University of Newcastle Callaghan NSW 2308 Australia Marj.Kibby@newcastle.edu.au +61 2 49216604