Hi Ellis, I think that "giving" cannot be equated with "empowering." Thus "inequality" and "stratification" are by default wrong and harmful in this context. Best, Jarek
From: "Ellis Godard" <ellis.godard@csun.edu> Reply-To: air-l@listserv.aoir.org, ellis.godard@csun.edu To: <air-l@listserv.aoir.org> Subject: Re: [Air-l] One Laptop Per Child Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 15:49:55 -0700
Christian Fuchs wrote:
If the $100 laptop is widely diffused in the Third World, Western actors selling these computers will derive profits, and a global divide in technological progress and standards will emerge that separates advanced Western technology users from users of less-advanced technologies in the Third World.
How does diffusing technology across a divide which already exists, enhance rather than diminish it? How does giving them computers inhibit their "technological progress", or have any deliterious effect on their technological standards?
...what is needed is an advanced $0 laptop with free software for people in developing countries as well as criticism of the logic that has caused the divide between developing and developed countries and solutions to the social, economic, political, and cultural inequalities that underpin the global digital divide".
What is "the logic that has caused" of which you speak?
The implication that inequality and stratification are necessarily wrong, much less demonstrably eliminatable, is very very close to absurd.
-eg
_______________________________________________ The air-l@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/