thanks, Jeremy i did not assume it was public - but rather that some FB groups describe themselves as having "public content, open to all" it is more straighforward when addressing one's personal information on FB - terms of service or not, my first ethical obligation is to research subjects. but what about those 'public' groups (and i deliberately put public in inverted commas here)? i am still not clear which situations require request of permission - is it only when citing directly, or for any mentioning of groups? -- and if they do require permission, i think its an interesting ethical question here about who owns the words: technically its FB but again, my sense of resesarch ethics and commitment is that it would be the group owners/admins adi
________________________________ From: jeremy hunsinger <jhuns@vt.edu> To: Adi Kuntsman <adi_kuntsman@yahoo.com> Cc: aoir list <air-l@aoir.org> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2011 2:54 PM Subject: Re: [Air-L] a question about privacy protection and copyright in Internet research
I would not assume anything on facebook is public or publicized other than things you can see on the open internet without login and even then those are copyrighted and as i recall have a license on top of the copyright limiting their public reception, but i could be wrong about the license as i can't find it now. Your ability to use that will be limited by the terms of service of facebook that you agree to (and their api terms are the most flexible). If you need permissions beyond those provided, then i think you need to ask facebook.
what i assume would be public if anything from facebook is anything that you would find preserved in a system like archive.org, the library of congress of the u.s. or the british library.
On May 6, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Adi Kuntsman wrote:
.. so, for example, in case of a 'public' FB group (loging required but noone needs to accept/friend you to be able to see it) - is it public or private and who, if any, should be asked for permission to research and cite?
thanks for advice
--
Dr. Adi Kuntsman Simon Research Fellow Department of Anthropology/ Research Institute for Cosmopolitan Cultures The University of Manchester Second Floor, Arthur Lewis Building, room 2.007 Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK http://adi.kuntsman.googlepages.com From: jeremy hunsinger <jhuns@vt.edu> To: aoir list <air-l@aoir.org> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2011 2:32 PM Subject: Re: [Air-L] a question about privacy protection and copyright in Internet research
yes, check login status, i agree. facebook is an odd case because of their terms of service. but if you cannot see something because you are not logged in, then you have questions of privacy much more significantly. most of my research currently deals with things that are a. no login (published blogs) or b. login required but company releases the necessary rights to material that may be openly viewed and anyone can login and openly view(second life). there are other issues in both because both can have private channels and sections, but i don't research those. On May 6, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Radhika Gajjala wrote:
good points
also if you are seeing something because you are a friend or in a circle -that reqd the user to "accept" you - it may be considered pvt
(as in FB)
Jeremy Hunsinger Center for Digital Discourse and Culture Virginia Tech
http://www.stswiki.org/ sts wiki http://transdisciplinarystudies.tmttlt.com/ Transdisciplinary Studies:the book series
I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. -Pablo Picasso
_______________________________________________ The Air-L@listserv.aoir.org mailing list is provided by the Association of Internet Researchers http://aoir.org Subscribe, change options or unsubscribe at: http://listserv.aoir.org/listinfo.cgi/air-l-aoir.org
Join the Association of Internet Researchers: http://www.aoir.org/
Jeremy Hunsinger Center for Digital Discourse and Culture Virginia Tech
Imagination is the one weapon in the war against reality. -Jules de Gaultier
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail /\ - against microsoft attachments