At 22:45 Uhr -0500 5.12.2005, Barry Wellman wrote:
the current AOIR debate about wikipedia highlights another problem. It is quite easy to make legally defamatory statements on Wikipedia.
Empirically, these statements are only harmful on a significant scale if anyone looks at them, believes them (and - in some cases - repeats them). The Seigenthaler episode is a good example. Being rather ignorant about the Who's Who in the media business I wouldn't have known of Seigenthaler and would never have connected him with the Robert Kennedy assassination, if it weren't for this discussion on air-l. The discussion only evolved because Seigenthaler himself (or his attourneys or his PR consultants) chose not to simply erase the false information but to contact mainstream classic media outlets. Ironically, in doing this Seigenthaler created a memory trace of a connection between his name and the assassinantion in many more minds than if he had just corrected the false information in the wikipedia entry. Maybe someone could dig a bit into the wikipedia logs and compare view stats for the versions of the Seigenthaler article on wikipedia? Ulf